Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looking like the end of April at this point, sorry for the delay!When will the bridges be available. I don’t see them on your website.
Me to! I believe we have already shipped some, but @MDT_OFFICIAL will have better visibility on this!I'm much more interested in the lefty ACC Elite eta
I'm much more interested in the lefty ACC Elite eta
Me to! I believe we have already shipped some, but @MDT_OFFICIAL will have better visibility on this!
- Josh
I don't think we can comment on this one yet, but there are things happening! As Anthony would say, keep your eyes on our social media and email listLong action this year?
@MDT_OFFICIAL @MDT_Josh
So I got this bad boy and I will say that is a great chassis.
The only thing that I’m not entirely loving, is how the cheek piece moves a bit at the end of its adjustment height. So if you’re using a scope that requires 1.5 inch rings, you’re gonna find yourself in a position where you run out of height adjustment, and at the end of the height adjustment the cheek piece wobbles a bit side to side.
Not really sure how I’m going to fix that, but it does affect your ability to get behind the scope properly.
Anyone know what the pitch / size of screw is used to attach to the pins for the cheek piece? I think that’s going to need a shim…
I’m seeing that both the control bridge and the Picatinny rail bridge (NV) are available.
I run a 1.5” mount, but have my cheek piece all the way down for my preferred jaw weld. Can’t say I’ve experienced any kind of wobble playing with the height though.@MDT_OFFICIAL @MDT_Josh
So I got this bad boy and I will say that is a great chassis.
The only thing that I’m not entirely loving, is how the cheek piece moves a bit at the end of its adjustment height. So if you’re using a scope that requires 1.5 inch rings, you’re gonna find yourself in a position where you run out of height adjustment, and at the end of the height adjustment the cheek piece wobbles a bit side to side.
Not really sure how I’m going to fix that, but it does affect your ability to get behind the scope properly.
Anyone know what the pitch / size of screw is used to attach to the pins for the cheek piece? I think that’s going to need a shim…
I’m seeing that both the control bridge and the Picatinny rail bridge (NV) are available.
Top of travel.We haven't had any issues with the cheek riser lock-up. Do you notice this at any height when it's up? Or is it specifically at the top of the travel? The screw is 10-32.
-Anthony
You tighten down the thumbscrew? Both my buttpad and cheekpiece wobble when not locked.Top of travel.
Maybe it‘s my hi German cheekbones, but it’s the top of the travel.
I’m pondering 3D printing a higher / taller cheek part, and then using longer screws.
The other possibility is adding 1.5cm of washers under the cheek piece.
Unless you have taller posts?
You must have really high cheek bones; we've actually mostly had complaints about the cheek riser not going low enough. I would say it's worth while to check that all the screws are tight as well. IE there are two 1/8 sockets on the top; maybe make sure they are gutentight.Top of travel.
Maybe it‘s my hi German cheekbones, but it’s the top of the travel.
I’m pondering 3D printing a higher / taller cheek part, and then using longer screws.
The other possibility is adding 1.5cm of washers under the cheek piece.
Unless you have taller posts?
...maybe make sure they are gutentight.
-Anthony
I can't remember but I just went to my local hardware store and replaced everything silver with black oxide.I see what you did there. Ausgezeichnet.
In other news, does anyone know the size of the elite grip screws? @NiteQwill, any idea what size those swanky black ones you used are?
You happen to be using any c-clips? I had to add one to both posts to remove a little up and down play on the cheek riser.@TheOE800 and I both went to the range yesterday… And we both have this chassis.
There is no doubt about it: if the cheek piece is out more than halfway, there is significant play.
The issue is that the thumbscrews cannot be properly tightened to prevent movement without the use of a wrench (plastic coated pliers in my case).
So this is absolutely a design flaw…
And now it’s happening with two chassis… so it’s not just a one off issue.
I suspect André the giant might’ve been able to pull that off, but the rest of us can only torque those things by hand so much.
Nah, I forgot about setting that up so neither of us was running the c-clips; would have been very helpful given all the removing of the cheekpiece I did for cleaning. I don’t actually need the c-clip for the buttpad as I’m blessed with average as hell LoP so I will try using both c-clips.You happen to be using any c-clips? I had to add one to both posts to remove a little up and down play on the cheek riser.
Belt sander.@MDT_Josh @MDT_OFFICIAL Is a new bag rider coming? The existing bag rider is angled downwards due to the flatter bottom of the SRS-X Elite stock where the mlok slot is.
Wow, that's a real drag. As you know, I've been thinking about buying one of these.@TheOE800 and I both went to the range yesterday… And we both have this chassis.
There is no doubt about it: if the cheek piece is out more than halfway, there is significant play.
The issue is that the thumbscrews cannot be properly tightened to prevent movement without the use of a wrench (plastic coated pliers in my case).
So this is absolutely a design flaw…
And now it’s happening with two chassis… so it’s not just a one off issue.
I suspect André the giant might’ve been able to pull that off, but the rest of us can only torque those things by hand so much.
And I actually have higher cheek bones than @GBMaryland...don't hate me because I'm beautiful! LOL....and if you ever saw me you'd know that I do have high cheek bones and me saying I'm beautiful is indeed a joke!You must have really high cheek bones
This, ^^, is easily resolved for those people with higher rings. But with large objective lens scopes, we need to put that comb riser up a good bit and if @GBMaryland says that the two they had at the range developed slop (play...if you like) then you can take that to the bank as I know him to be a very rigorous, data driven person.we've actually mostly had complaints about the cheek riser not going low enough.
Pic?The existing bag rider is angled downwards due to the flatter bottom of the SRS-X Elite stock where the mlok slot is.
Wow, def not optimal...right? Have you seen any sort of dip in the muzzle shooting during recoil with that slant?
While you were at the "local hardware store and [replacing] everything silver with black oxide," you should have changed out those mount screws. #hideous
There's a spectrum of rich poor I'm on... I'm on that spectrum, I can't afford anodized Gucci Titanium screws.You heard the man. Anodize that Ti!
I haven't noticed a difference to be honest.Wow, def not optimal...right? Have you seen any sort of dip in the muzzle shooting during recoil with that slant?
I would think it would cause you to shoot a little bit low or not??
Thanks and beautiful gun....even with the bright screws in the mount! hahaI haven't noticed a difference to be honest.
Thanks!Thanks and beautiful gun....even with the bright screws in the mount! haha
What action is that, if you don't mind.
And that's a shorty can with a muzzle brake????
How are you liking the nv bridges? I was thinking about installing 2 in the same configuration as yours, but am also considering having the control bridge followed by the nv bridge up front.Thanks!
Impact 737r
Area419 Maverick in the shortest configuration. 2 seasons with it so far. It's great!
The price tho! I got a full length bridge for my ai, 240$, I think a full length for the acc would be 4 covers right? 500$ is a lot for some small machined aluminum pieces.I have two control bridges and a NV bridge at the end. (I'm primarily trying to lower vapor trail related interference.)
The machining is a thing of beauty. Work great. There are metal studs on the NV bridge, but oddly, they are not a snug fit into the holes on the chassis, so I'm not really sure what they are there for... lots of screws, very stable.
I couldn't agree more, having made the outlay myself; but let's me honest, there is a little more value than the, what, $80 squishes? They gouge us every step of the way, because we let them.The price tho! I got a full length bridge for my ai, 240$, I think a full length for the acc would be 4 covers right? 500$ is a lot for some small machined aluminum pieces.
It'd be pretty easy to 3d print something I'd sure think.hopefully some 3rd parties can start making accessories like these bridges
Hard facts right there. Whole industry is like that, but my paycheck hasn’t caught up yet.They gouge us every step of the way, because we let them.
This looks like it might address your concern:I’m not terribly concerned with the slant, as while It’s definitely there, I have a bag.
it would be really nice to have an aluminum piece That’s straight.
We tested this extensively, and we didn't have any issues; best to send us an e-mail so we can work through it and see what is going on. One thing to try is to take the LOP and cheek riser clamps apart and try swapping the springs between them, but reach out to us so we can see what is going on. I even just tested a buttstock off the line with no issues.@TheOE800 and I both went to the range yesterday… And we both have this chassis.
There is no doubt about it: if the cheek piece is out more than halfway, there is significant play.
The issue is that the thumbscrews cannot be properly tightened to prevent movement without the use of a wrench (plastic coated pliers in my case).
So this is absolutely a design flaw…
And now it’s happening with two chassis… so it’s not just a one off issue.
I suspect André the giant might’ve been able to pull that off, but the rest of us can only torque those things by hand so much.
We shall see, it is very possible!@MDT_Josh @MDT_OFFICIAL Is a new bag rider coming? The existing bag rider is angled downwards due to the flatter bottom of the SRS-X Elite stock where the mlok slot is.
Love you guys...really do...but "possible" should become "definite", IMO. Otherwise we will all be buying riders from AUS.We shall see, it is very possible!
-Anthony
Thank you for the feedback. It is appreciated. The question is never about just changing a program. It's about what we are trying to accomplish and what is going to be the best bag rider we can make.Love you guys...really do...but "possible" should become "definite", IMO. Otherwise we will all be buying riders from AUS.
ATP Australia Ultimate Bag Rider for MDT ACC Elite Chassis
We only use quality gear at Australian Tactical Precision (ATP), this principal also extends to the products we manufacture. One size does not fit all, that also applies to bag riders. There are many rear bag manufacturers out there and the spacing between the ears can be significantly...australiantacticalprecision.com.au
How hard is is to modify the existing bag rider CNC program to do this? I'm not a machinist by any stretch, but this doesn't seem hard to do.
Submitted a case… Tried to send a video of what’s going on but you guys can’t take anything quite so large.We tested this extensively, and we didn't have any issues; best to send us an e-mail so we can work through it and see what is going on. One thing to try is to take the LOP and cheek riser clamps apart and try swapping the springs between them, but reach out to us so we can see what is going on. I even just tested a buttstock off the line with no issues.
-Anthony
Its to be 20 MB or less, or you can always send it through Facebook Messenger to us as well.Submitted a case… Tried to send a video of what’s going on but you guys can’t take anything quite so large.