I know this subject has divided families and may have been one of the reasons the civil war started but I have to ask before I drop $2k on glass. I'm just getting into long range and I'm a pipefitter by trade so working with inches and fractions is done by me on a daily basis, so using a MOA scope would make the most sense to me but its sounds like most people seem to lean towards MIL. I've never had to worry about being too precise before, when I was taught to shoot back in the stone ages if the deer was @ 400 yards you aimed at the spine and hit him in the lungs. In 3 gun its rather simple, 0 @ 200yds 3 1/2" low @ 25yds 1 1/2" high @ 100yds and 8 1/2" low @ 300yds anything past that I use the hold over marks and it gets me on target. But their not very small targets ether. So my question is I only want to learn things once, will I be wasting my time with an MOA optic? Most people say the MIL thing is easier since it's based off tenths, but to me it seems a little more confusing. 1 Moa is close enough to 1" @ 100yds, 1 MIL is 3.6" @ 100yds so if someone tells me I'm 8 MIL low @ 600yds there would be a lot of math involved. However if someone told me I'm 16 MOA low @ 600yds the math would be easy, 1 MOA is 6" @ 600yds so with 1/4 MOA adjustments it would be 10 clicks......right? What an I missing and do I need to take the time to re learn how to do MIL math instead of MOA math? If I stick with MOA will I struggle talking to other people at the range who my be spotting me?