Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, if this is correct Does Malaysia Want To Know What Happened To Flight MH-370? | SOFREP
One would have to say it was handled deftly.
Things that make you say Hmmm... did they just say they shot down a Malaysian Airline in the Ukraine/Russian borderland
Actually, if this is correct Does Malaysia Want To Know What Happened To Flight MH-370? | SOFREP
One would have to say it was handled deftly.
Things that make you say Hmmm... did they just say they shot down a Malaysian Airline in the Ukraine/Russian borderland
Putin's puppets in action.
We don't talk about that here any more.
Dunno if any MANPADs have the ass to hit an airliner at FL330.
Associated Press reporting a Russian Buk air defense system is what shot it down; that would be a SA-11 or SA-17, I think?
I'm sure everybody will beat around the bush because nobody wants to just come out and say it, but basically the Russians are in the Ukraine waging war to expand Mother Russia and we pretend that since they are not wearing Russian flags on their uniforms they are not Russian Army. (Pretty much the same play as in Crimea)
Thanks but i don't do drugs while on the other hand cheerios did all the damage they could so unfortunately i don't have any sound advice for you.
Also forgot to mention Ukies already did something similar to TU-154 in 2001 and we won't go into Vincennes battle record. Now the question remains is it Russia 1, US 1, Ukraine 1, Rebels 1 or is it Russia 1(2!??!), US 1(2??!?), Ukraine 2, Rebels 0.
I would assume operating S-300 (Russia only) or Buk (Ukies and 1 captured for rebels in unknown state) will take a crew of at least 10-20 men with particular training and that while military hardware tends to be like Lego these systems are not so user friendly to enable mere peasants to connect few cables and press few buttons and voila plane shot down. If this is correct (and very probably it is) then persons manning these systems deliberately shot down a plane cruising at high altitude with constant speed which is either deliberate or accidental (mistaking passenger airplane with something along the Su-24/27 or IL-76 which have service ceiling at that altitude for example AN-26 does not have it as it flies much lower) but again i have no clue as to the Buk capabilities to display info on radar signatures or picking up commercial transponders - which i'm about 99.999999% that this capability is present).
It simply does not add up:
- civilian planes not diverted from warzone,
- a plane flying out of it usual route regardless of point 1,
- missing tracking data (check web on it) on airliner,
- why downing plane at 10k while being under attack from planes flying much lower and having such system operational would bring more benefit targeting planes attacking than those clearly transitioning at high altitude,
- who gains most from such an incident especially on the verge of massive defeat and personnel loss.
That route is still quite a long way SW than MH17 went.
Reportedly, the flight was deviating north for weather. I have no idea if that report is accurate.
Point being, lots of western airliners were using that airspace prior to MH17 (most likely) falling victim to somebody who thought they were shooting down another Ukrainian IL-76...
Reports of looting:
MH17 eyewitness accounts emerge of the horror that unfolded at crash site | Mail Online
I've also seen unconfirmed information that bodies have been stacked like potato sacks on trucks and removed from the site by those who consider themselves to be "in charge," absent recognized Ukrainian state authority. Ransom, anyone?
Absolutely disgusting ...
I had a theory that this jet made it to Africa and landed. I figured if it did there would magically have to be some reason for boots on the ground over there. Well, magically there needs to be 3000 troops sent to Liberia for the "ebola" outbreak that we have been repeatedly told for the last 3 weeks that "this is a world wide threat". Just sayin'.
Have a couple cups of decaf, take off the tinfoil hat, and use some critical thinking skills.
Even IF that airplane was in Liberia, why would it require 3000 "boots on the ground" instead of using MUCH lower profile SOF (some of which are already operating in Africa) to secure the aircraft?
Furthermore, while the 777 is a long range aircraft, ML370 was fueled to fly from Kuala Lampur to Beijing. KL to anywhere in Liberia (and there are only a couple of airports capable of handling a 777 in the entire country) is more than 2.5x that distance, meaning there's no way it would have had enough range to get that far.
100meterpete said:... It was spotted by many people in the Maldives going that direction. Make no mistake. It is our current battleground, tinfoil or no tinfoil.