• HideTV Updates Coming Monday

    HideTV will be down on Monday for updates. We'll let you all know as soon as it's back up and message @alexj-12 with any questions!

  • Win an RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!

    Join the contest Subscribe

Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1

816B4861-4417-4B1B-BAE8-87229C342C6C.jpeg
 
maybe hes 18 years old... not like us old farts lol
Some of those girls look to be less than 18. If so, it's putting all of us at risk that come to this site, not just Frank. Besides, its getting close to being a pedo creepy trend. Almost every series of posts he does has one snuck in. Evidently I'm not the only one who has noticed and isn't OK with it. This last one is blatantly suggestive of placing a minor in a sexually provocative situation. That is NOT ok. I would wager that most here with daughters or a proper sense of right and wrong are not cool with this bullshit.
 
Last edited:
Some of those girls look to be less than 18. If so, it's putting all of us at risk that come to this site, not just Frank. Besides, its getting close to being a pedo creepy trend. Almost every series of posts he does has one snuck in. Evidently I'm not the only one who has noticed and isn't OK with it. This last one is blatantly suggestive of placing a minor in a sexually provocative situation. That is NOT ok. I would wager that most here with daughters or a proper sense of right and wrong are not cool with this bullshit.
How do you tell the difference in age? Do you mouth them like horses or have you looked at enough under age women that you are an expert ?
 
Some of those girls look to be less than 18. If so, it's putting all of us at risk that come to this site, not just Frank. Besides, its getting close to being a pedo creepy trend. Almost every series of posts he does has one snuck in. Evidently I'm not the only one who has noticed and isn't OK with it. This last one is blatantly suggestive of placing a minor in a sexually provocative situation. That is NOT ok. I would wager that most here with daughters or a proper sense of right and wrong are not cool with this bullshit.
agreed 1000%
 
How do you tell the difference in age? Do you mouth them like horses or have you looked at enough under age women that you are an expert ?
How do I tell that you are one that potentially likes underage children? Probably from your response. At least it leads me into thinking that. Not trying to start a fight, but underage abuse/trafficking/etc (which is what these pics suggest and eventually promote) is not something to joke about.
 
Last edited:
How do I tell that you are one that potentially likes underage children? Probably from your response. At least it leads me into thinking that. Not trying to start a fight, but this is not something to joke about.
maybe they should have to post an i d with their age on it before you look at it? I think you got perv problems that you are trying to hide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bullfrog08
maybe they should have to post an i d with their age on it before you look at it? I think you got perv problems that you are trying to hide.
Your immaturity is glaring.

Maybe the best option is having discretion before posting a pic. That would be good.

Lets look at the page 1 rules:
- No naked crotch pics
- No Politics
- No religious stuff
- NO celebrity nudes, fake nudes, or uploaded nudes

If you're posting topless pics they need to be hot linked and hosted elsewhere. If you upload something that draws
undue legal scrutiny to this site your post will be subject to removal and you can be banned from membership.

The Motivational Pic Thread is dead; Long Live the Motivational Pic Thread v2.0!!!


IMG_5644.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pbgt and Slash0311
Man it’s like that old fart is back again, what was his name? Shooter or something like that I think.

I like women as much or more than the next guy, but 95% of all your posts being your softcore porn collection is a little sad. Wasn’t there a 3 picture limit at one time since it was costing Frank space and money or is tht not a thing anymore?
 
Man it’s like that old fart is back again, what was his name? Shooter or something like that I think.

I like women as much or more than the next guy, but 95% of all your posts being your softcore porn collection is a little sad. Wasn’t there a 3 picture limit at one time since it was costing Frank space and money or is tht not a thing anymore?
SHOOTER65 if memory serves me correctly. TITS TITS AND MORE TITS! Comes back from a brief suspension and drops about 2 full pages of…TITS!
 
OK, time for the GAOW award for the week of 03/10. Cut off was 12Noon ET. Anything thereafter will count towards next week.

This week we had a ton of entries (53 recognized in total), so I'm upping the list of nominees to 15.

This week's 15 nominees:

1) Cowpokey - Ms. Bum Bum

2) steelhead - Hmmmm... Bouganvillia?

3) Jasonprox700 - Pensive

4) NockHunter - balance beam

5) Nockhunter - Get Tangled in my web

6) 143lrsd - Beachwalk

7) jasonprox700 - Can't get up

8) NockHunter - Leather Joy

9) jasonprox700 - Short Kilt!

10) jasonprox700 - You got my stockings?

11) NockHunter - Afternoon Stroll

12) Redhook - Wanna Ride?

13) jasonprox700 - Sweatty!

14) NockHunter - Fancy a Ride?

15) 143lrsd - Window too Short!







And the Bronze award goes to:

Steelhead - Hmmmm... Bouganvillia?

b3ba46f6-712b-4db1-a7b9-f53072215cb8-jpeg.7820506

PS. Can you find a larger image of this? None on TinEye.... :D


Silver award goes to:

NockHunter - Get Tangled in my Web

1646579866996-png.7821668



And, the GAOW award for the week of 03/10 goes to:

NockHunter - Balance Beam

1646543014697-png.7821532



Honorable mentions this week (1 additional) to:


brazil_butt-jpg.7819077
645ba738-9ce0-49f1-bbd9-dbe19b5615ee-jpeg.7823981


Cowpokey - Ms. Bum Bum , --------------------------------------------- jasonprox700 - Can't get up. And

793bc5bc-e649-4954-8047-fa5451a90258-jpeg.7823862


143lrsd - Window too Short!

A special recognition to @jasonprox700 who got the most entries this week with 19.

Hate to end on a sour note, but there were several entries this week from @barneybdb that I would have loved to nominate. One or two were even going to get "Honorable mentions" if not get "on the platform." The problem being, as I was doing the nominations, the pics would either disappear / be "deleted" from the source site, as if that site did not want their pics linked to any other site. These were pics from the "izispicy" website. Some may still show here, but the one's I wanted to nominate were all deleted or disappeared. I don't believe any were "illegal" per SH rules, so it wasn't that. Sorry Barney.... :(If there's a different way you can link them, I'll reconsider for next week. PM me if you want the details.

Until next week, then....
 
I have to laugh at those who gaze at this page and complain about the soft porn content. Makes me think they are closet pervs who secretly keep this site so their wife won't know what they are looking at. Then complain because the women are too old, too young, too saggy, and too many pictures etc...you are desperate for reading material if you come here and not happy with what is posted for your enjoyment. Go to that other safe picture post.
 
The Royal Navy received 2,012 Corsairs. It was the fleet air arm that first used the Corsair from a carrier. Ironically for an aircraft that made its name in the Pacific, the Corsair’s first carrier action came in the North Sea. On 2 April 1944, Corsairs of No. 1834 squadron, based on H.M.S. Victorious took part in an attack on the German battleship Tirpitz, providing fighter cover. Further strikes against the Tirpitz followed in July and August, this time supported by 1842 squadron.

Chance Vought Corsairs of the Fleet Air Arm
Chance Vought Corsairs of the Fleet Air Arm
The Royal Navy received 95 F4U-1s (designating them as Corsair Is) and 510 F4U-1As (Corsair II) from Chance Vought production. They also received 430 Brewster produced F3A-1Ds (Corsair III) – just over half of the Brewster company's total production of Corsairs, and 977 Goodyear produced FG-1Ds (Corsair IV). If the war had continued in 1946, F4U-4Bs were allocated for the Fleet Air Arm, but were never delivered.

Despite their early European venture, the British Corsairs spent most of the war in the Indian and Pacific oceans. They entered British service just as the fleet returned to the Indian ocean in strength, and took part in strikes against Japanese targets in Burma and Sumatra, including the oil refineries at Palembang. In 1945 the British fleet carriers moved to the Pacific, to take part in the final attack on Japan. British Corsairs saw action against Kamikaze attacks as the British Pacific Fleet attacked the Sakishima Islands, at the southern tip of Japan, before finishing the war making attacks on the Tokyo area.
Yes, I know. I was joking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barneybdb