Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest SubscribeBro you gotta stop with the little girl pics that you sprinkle in with the others.
maybe hes 18 years old... not like us old farts lolBro you gotta stop with the little girl pics that you sprinkle in with the others.
Some of those girls look to be less than 18. If so, it's putting all of us at risk that come to this site, not just Frank. Besides, its getting close to being a pedo creepy trend. Almost every series of posts he does has one snuck in. Evidently I'm not the only one who has noticed and isn't OK with it. This last one is blatantly suggestive of placing a minor in a sexually provocative situation. That is NOT ok. I would wager that most here with daughters or a proper sense of right and wrong are not cool with this bullshit.maybe hes 18 years old... not like us old farts lol
How do you tell the difference in age? Do you mouth them like horses or have you looked at enough under age women that you are an expert ?Some of those girls look to be less than 18. If so, it's putting all of us at risk that come to this site, not just Frank. Besides, its getting close to being a pedo creepy trend. Almost every series of posts he does has one snuck in. Evidently I'm not the only one who has noticed and isn't OK with it. This last one is blatantly suggestive of placing a minor in a sexually provocative situation. That is NOT ok. I would wager that most here with daughters or a proper sense of right and wrong are not cool with this bullshit.
agreed 1000%Some of those girls look to be less than 18. If so, it's putting all of us at risk that come to this site, not just Frank. Besides, its getting close to being a pedo creepy trend. Almost every series of posts he does has one snuck in. Evidently I'm not the only one who has noticed and isn't OK with it. This last one is blatantly suggestive of placing a minor in a sexually provocative situation. That is NOT ok. I would wager that most here with daughters or a proper sense of right and wrong are not cool with this bullshit.
How do I tell that you are one that potentially likes underage children? Probably from your response. At least it leads me into thinking that. Not trying to start a fight, but underage abuse/trafficking/etc (which is what these pics suggest and eventually promote) is not something to joke about.How do you tell the difference in age? Do you mouth them like horses or have you looked at enough under age women that you are an expert ?
maybe they should have to post an i d with their age on it before you look at it? I think you got perv problems that you are trying to hide.How do I tell that you are one that potentially likes underage children? Probably from your response. At least it leads me into thinking that. Not trying to start a fight, but this is not something to joke about.
Your immaturity is glaring.maybe they should have to post an i d with their age on it before you look at it? I think you got perv problems that you are trying to hide.
maybe they should have to post an i d with their age on it before you look at it? I think you got perv problems that you are trying to hide.
SHOOTER65 if memory serves me correctly. TITS TITS AND MORE TITS! Comes back from a brief suspension and drops about 2 full pages of…TITS!Man it’s like that old fart is back again, what was his name? Shooter or something like that I think.
I like women as much or more than the next guy, but 95% of all your posts being your softcore porn collection is a little sad. Wasn’t there a 3 picture limit at one time since it was costing Frank space and money or is tht not a thing anymore?
Yes, I know. I was joking.The Royal Navy received 2,012 Corsairs. It was the fleet air arm that first used the Corsair from a carrier. Ironically for an aircraft that made its name in the Pacific, the Corsair’s first carrier action came in the North Sea. On 2 April 1944, Corsairs of No. 1834 squadron, based on H.M.S. Victorious took part in an attack on the German battleship Tirpitz, providing fighter cover. Further strikes against the Tirpitz followed in July and August, this time supported by 1842 squadron.
Chance Vought Corsairs of the Fleet Air Arm
The Royal Navy received 95 F4U-1s (designating them as Corsair Is) and 510 F4U-1As (Corsair II) from Chance Vought production. They also received 430 Brewster produced F3A-1Ds (Corsair III) – just over half of the Brewster company's total production of Corsairs, and 977 Goodyear produced FG-1Ds (Corsair IV). If the war had continued in 1946, F4U-4Bs were allocated for the Fleet Air Arm, but were never delivered.
Despite their early European venture, the British Corsairs spent most of the war in the Indian and Pacific oceans. They entered British service just as the fleet returned to the Indian ocean in strength, and took part in strikes against Japanese targets in Burma and Sumatra, including the oil refineries at Palembang. In 1945 the British fleet carriers moved to the Pacific, to take part in the final attack on Japan. British Corsairs saw action against Kamikaze attacks as the British Pacific Fleet attacked the Sakishima Islands, at the southern tip of Japan, before finishing the war making attacks on the Tokyo area.
Got news for ya.... it was the Brits that taught the US how to land them on carriers.Brits can’t fly Corsairs!
Lucas, the prince of darkness.
No one noticed the Helllcat in front of the Corsair
The original inventor of darkness.Lucas, the prince of darkness.
Yep! And, yes, I knew that when I posted.Got news for ya.... it was the Brits that taught the US how to land them on carriers.
On edit, I see I was late to the party on that observation.
aka Wildcat. Anyone can fly that. Why I didn’t mention it.That wasn't a Hellcat. That was a Martlet.
Again, late to the party