Such a shame, I'd love to have the finer moa adjustments with a mil reticle.
I can hook you up. Need a mark 4 leupold with a TMR reticle and dumb MOA turrets?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Such a shame, I'd love to have the finer moa adjustments with a mil reticle.
Many have.. just not getting reports in here I got them in my place. Tracking is dead on. I already accindently did a on a 3' high concrete torture test of the SH4 and its fine... scared the crap out of me in the middle of the night.OK...So the turrets track even while being abused and his failure to return to windage zero on shot 5 (did it really track???)
Will someone please put this on a rifle with some recoil and put a few hundred down range? Nothing short of a unbraked 6.5 CM. That or put it on a crap rifle and bounce test it on other than concrete and rocks.
Try that with a PST and let us know how that works out!I am eventually going to get one once they have a better reticle or illumination, I'll throw it on my 7.1 lb (rifle only) .338 Norma Mag with a MBM 5 port brake. That should test it on harsh braked recoil.
If they refurbed it, that means it has already broken once.I don't understand why anyone would mess with one of these when you can get a refurb PST II for the same money.
I'll still take a "Broken once" and fixed from a long term company with a reputation over a new optic from a "shilled" advertising spree with only that as a reputation.If they refurbed it, that means it has already broken once.
Curious about how you drew that conclusion? According to the manufacturer, it's 50BMG ratedI woud say based on everything posted that the scope would be a solid item on anything 5.56 (recoil) and under.
Vortex was once a "new" company as well.I'll still take a "Broken once" and fixed from a long term company with a reputation over a new optic from a "shilled" advertising spree with only that as a reputation.
That is in consideration, first things first with this first group of lines and that would be down the road. The reticle designs will be considered based on input/feedback and my FB group runs polls and surveys and we seek out to improve. There are plans soon to come out with the EP4's with the simpler SH4 reticle as well based on requests and some of us feel a marriage of the less the ranging feature might be something that might be considered down the line. Nothing is set but we are listening and aim to develop what the market is wanting. Thanks for giving us a shot and in time we aim to improve and hope to branch out to certain sectors of the shooting needs both in reticles and scope designs.I would like to know since Arken is now on SH, do they plan on making an illuminated reticle option, and do they plan on making the reticle slightly thicker in the future?
The scopes are rated to handle up to 50 bmp and there is Arken Youtube videos of them shooting on a SCAR which is known for being tough of scopes.I woud say based on everything posted that the scope would be a solid item on anything 5.56 (recoil) and under.
The scopes are rated to handle up to 50 bmp
I received my EP4 6-24x50. The parallax moves fine, not tight and not to loose. Same with the focus piece. I have not mounted on a rifle as of yet. The main reason I have not mounted the scope is the reticle. The thing just bugs me. I wish the center dot was bigger like IOR's MP8 or just cross hairs like the S&B PMII P4F reticle.
I order and received the SH 4-14x44 because of the reticle, I like the looks of it better the the EP's reticle. The parallax knob and eyepiece are incredibly hard to move on this one. Once again, I have not mounted this scope because of the tight impossible to move knobs. I plan on getting them loose before mounting this scope.
I think that combination of the SH reticle and the EP reticle would be the way to go on the EP line scopes. Use the cross hair and the mil hash marks instead of the ranging marks and center dot that the EP reticle uses. That too me would be a winning combination, along with illumination.
Now that is some funny shit right there50 bumps happen in my safe before I even drag it into the field....
Odd, I thought the ocular focus was the focusThe focus piece? Generally the parallax knob is the "focus piece."
Un-paid/Un-sponsored real world user reviews if you please...
Seems woefully inefficient for a BMP...
Typos aside - Not trying to be an arse....Who rated it? What are the specs for said rating? One could mount this on a 20mm recoilless rifle and if nothing falls off externally, then one could say it's rated for it, never mind the internals went random.
Patiently waiting for respected member usage reports. Lowlight tasked it some, I can not recall the rifle it was on. That is a sample of 1
arse..... is sorta what comes to my mind..
arse..... is sorta what comes to my mind..
That is only a 4-16 EP4 and it is a very compact scope at only 12.2" long but with a 34mm tubeThese scopes look tiny on those massive rifles.
I put the shade on the end of my sh4, but ithink it looks better without it. The way our range sits majority of the day the sun is shining right into the scopeIf it feels too short, you could jut throw a shade on the end.
Looking to put a less expensive scope on my 223 trainer that my wife will be using more than me.
Arken 6-24
Athlon Argos
Riton X3
Athlon Midas Tac
ive had one ordered for months now still no scope
Another new scope in the price range that was just released to look at is the Vortex Strike Eagle 5-25x56.
![]()
That Vortex actually looks like a really nice scope reading the specs. I’ll be really interested to see what people think of it once some reviewers get their hands on it.
that sucks to. what gets me is they said it was in stock when i ordered itYou aren't getting it anytime soon with COVID19 and restrictions on Chinese goods.
that sucks to. what gets me is they said it was in stock when i ordered it
Just out of curiosity, what is wrong with the Trex stuff? I watched his review of the Arken and other optics. His old reviews seemed much better. Joe's stuff makes me laugh and I like that he even looks at lower budget stuff.Joe is a good dude and a funny dude, but torture test? It is still better than the TRex stuff though...
ILya