You know what I find to be hilarious about this pissing match that you are engaged in ?
It is the fact that you find all of your information on the internet. In fairness, the information that your "debators" have presented to counter your points, also come from the internet.
So, in reality, both parties (you and your "debators") are arguing, based on information that pretty obviously comes from biased sources. You can argue that your opposition has "information that comes from a "biased" standpoint, but in reality, the same is true of you/your information.
So, having said all of the above, you can argue your points, but it is based on "information" that comes from sources that are trying to further a particular agenda. You are welcome to levy the same, but opposite accusation, and you "might" not be wrong.
At the end of the day, it seems REALLY silly to be continually arguing points that are designed to be nothing more than divisive.
I'd caution everyone that the information provided by the MSM/Internet is primarily designed/intended to influence people into accepting a particular agenda. Think for yourself. Don't let others tell you what to think.