In a perfect close to pride month, the Supreme Court ruled Friday that the alphabet people cannot force you to affirm beliefs you don't hold.
thefederalist.com
We have 7 dudes that were granted religious exemptions but told they could not be accommodated - it would be too big a burden on the mission.
Yet the state issued orders making the accommodations we sought mandatory just a month after my suspension when vaccinated Troopers continued to get COVID probably taking 10 days free vacation to sit home asymptomatic.
These Saintly Seven should already be healed. There has been some negotiation but it’s comedy on the part of the state basically telling them they must plead guilty and accept time served. All seven told the state to eat a big dick.
An injunction kept them from being fired so they have been suspended without pay more than two years now.
Doing some internet sleuthing I found this gem I was never aware of by the civil service commissioner…..
View attachment 8174949
If this were done I would have LEOSA back and perhaps the school resource officer position I applied for a few weeks ago might have earned a response. Not too many places willing to say “Hey we hired a Dishonorable Discharge to watch your kids”
With all the favorable wind I’m concerned in my Federal case affidavit I might have said too much.
Most of my fellow Dishonorables followed a template in their affidavits. Mine is a bit more involved.
For more reasons than purely fetal cells (reason enough) these mandates are unlawful.
My concern is if they accept my affidavit than there is precedent to never again allow a mandate such as this which would be my intent.
Our case
Barbosa et al v. Massachusetts Department of State Police (1:22-cv-12013), Massachusetts District Court, Filed: 11/23/2022
www.pacermonitor.com
The affidavits were filed May 12, 23 and my affidavit is 18 of 30.
I think the other 29 are all almost word for word the same.
Hope I don’t get screwed for missing the memo.