Magnification ring moves independent of the eyepiece, NF is literally pulling out all the stops
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Rifle Scopes New high power Nightforce NX8?
- Thread starter acg
- Start date
Does the mag ring turn independently on the NXS? Just watched their live instagram video and it doesn't on the NX8 which is a huge plus for me.
I don't recall on the NSX but on the NSX F1 it doesn't move independent.
So to confirm:
4-32 x 50 F1 - 13.5"- 90 minutes (26.2 MILs) of travel - $2150
2.5-20 x 50 F1 - 12" - 110 minutes (32 MILs) of travel - $1950
Both scopes:
28oz. weight
ED glass - but from what I'm told it's not *quite* ATACR level, but far better than NXS
10m to infinity parallax
Digillum illumination - red & green
Zerostop and Capped windage
Mag ring moves independently (same with the NX8 1-8x F1 - entire ocular moves on the ATACR 1-8x F1)
4-32 x 50 F1 - 13.5"- 90 minutes (26.2 MILs) of travel - $2150
2.5-20 x 50 F1 - 12" - 110 minutes (32 MILs) of travel - $1950
Both scopes:
28oz. weight
ED glass - but from what I'm told it's not *quite* ATACR level, but far better than NXS
10m to infinity parallax
Digillum illumination - red & green
Zerostop and Capped windage
Mag ring moves independently (same with the NX8 1-8x F1 - entire ocular moves on the ATACR 1-8x F1)
Attachments
Last edited:
Their official spec photos suck - both are 28oz
Attachments
Just Mil-C for now though lots of us speculate Mil-XT wont be offered to keep from undercutting the ATACR lineup.
Sure does look like mil-xt is in the specs as a reticle offered.
MOAR, MIL-C, MIL-XT, Tremor3
Will confirm
Will confirm
I stand corrected then i couldn't see with the blurry pics that is awesome though.
Yes, independent. Entire ocular rotates on ATACR (which I prefer.. looks like our votes cancel each other)
I can’t tell or haven’t looked hard enough... is there illumination for the reticle at this MSRP?
Initial reticle offerings will be MOAR and MIL-C
Last edited:
We are thinking a reticle that won’t cover too much of a target for precision shooting at 32x will be able to be seen at 4x in a FFP scope? I really hope so I just don’t see how they can.
Highly unlikely without illumination.
There is nothing in these reticles to bring the eye to the center at low power. Thats why I'm hesitating replacing my LRHS with one until the review come out. But I most likely will because it does have illumination.
There is nothing in these reticles to bring the eye to the center at low power. Thats why I'm hesitating replacing my LRHS with one until the review come out. But I most likely will because it does have illumination.
No. He’s saying he wants to be able to see the reticle at 4x and anything that’s not obstructive at 32 will be crazy tiny at 4. As you say illumination will help with that.
Most likely but id also venture to guess 32x given the design isn't going to be anything like 25x or 35x on the ATACRs.
I’ll be interested to see by how much. Been contemplating on trying to loose some weight on the AIAX by replacing the razor Gen 2 but definitely don’t wanna downgrade in glass. My eyes are on both for sure.
Yep. And part of me says it won’t be a big deal, because I worry about walking shots in poor light with this reticle. Well, I shouldn’t be walking in or out in legal light. So if I can remember to turn illumination on the first half hour and last half hour it shouldn’t be an issue. But I feel like it will be, and I don’t want to have to rely on a battery for those shots is all. I’m sure I’m blowing it out of proportion but this argument happens with 3x/4x zoom FFP scopes. I don’t see how it can be anything but much much worse with an 8x scope. I really hope these new NF’s prove me wrong!
this is the reason I' looking to change the scope on my RPR in 243Win; the H59 reticle in my burris Xtr2 disappears in low-light on 4x (and my illumination does not seem to work)
I don't have any direct comparison photos, but I'm assuming they modified the reticle sizes to some extent for such a broad magnification range.
After having looked through them, they seemed just as usable on the lowest magnification setting as these MIL-R illuminated examples on 4x.
After having looked through them, they seemed just as usable on the lowest magnification setting as these MIL-R illuminated examples on 4x.
Attachments
The floor examples I saw were in MOA with 20MOA turrets.
The 'glamour shots' they have posted do appear to show 10MIL turrets.
The 'glamour shots' they have posted do appear to show 10MIL turrets.
Attachments
Last edited:
It does really does. I’m excited to hear and see what people think of them once they get them. I’m looking to loose some weight on my AX to make it more hunter friendly and this could be the ticket (Gen 2 Razor now). It’ll all depends on image quality because it’s checking all the boxes right now.
I just saw USO has a 2.5-20 coming out in their TS series. Which means it could be in the same price range maybe a little lower.
This scope appears, on paper, to be a strong competitor to my LRHS.
I just can’t help but like the G2H reticle better than anything NF is offering on these.
I just can’t help but like the G2H reticle better than anything NF is offering on these.
While I agree, especially for hunting, I would like something a bit more refined for my long range AR. This is definitely the right combo of power, weight and size for me. I just don’t hav a new scope in the budget this year. I shall see...
Right now I have a 3-12 LRHS, 3-24x42 March, and 3-24x52 March and depending on how initial reviews are, all could potentially be replaced by these.
Weight and reticle is what’s holding me back from replacing the LRHS and glass for the other two. Will have to wait and see when they come out.
Weight and reticle is what’s holding me back from replacing the LRHS and glass for the other two. Will have to wait and see when they come out.
It is our pleasure to work with you on this.
Please give us a call and we will get you all set
Doug
516-217-1000
I called NF today to ask about a reticle change for my ATACR's. Apparently, they're no longer offering that service. :-(
But, I asked about these scopes. The guy said it's the exact same glass as the ATACR. That's great if it's true.
These scopes fit all my needs and wants with the exception of the low profile elevation turret. I hate the tall turret on my hunting rifles. They just get in the way on a pack and maneuvering.
"Same glass" means absolutely nothing. That's what marketing people say when they need to give a vague answer.
I suspect ATACR is a better optimized system design.
Ilya
ilya has it right.
glass okay it's a good starting point. but theres way more to the system than just the glass itself. coatings numer of elements etc especially when you get smaller and lighter and shorter, and with an 8x erector
look at the kahles or eotech vodoo scopes. they didnt changes the glass but other things to make the CA go away
