I'd say the same...I've had mine for a few years now (2021) on a 308 gas gun that gets a bit of use but nothing over the top due to price of ammo/reloading components. Zero issues and I probably have close to 3,000 rounds with the 3-18 on the rifle. I can't see selling it unless they came out with a new version that's smaller than the original.
Overall the image is, dare I say, better than my Cronus BTR Gen2 which is a Japanese scope that cost twice as much albeit in a different magnification range. A bit brighter with slightly better contrast. Other than its physical size (a tad long), I have zero complaints. I have a similar reticle (MRAD) and like it quite a bit. I want to say I paid $699 for it way back when which looking back is an absolute steal.
Can't comment on the warranty issue one way or the other.
I don't have a ton of scopes but it is the only one (other than my new PLxC) where I haven't looked to see if there's a better option. It replaced a Primary Arms 3-18 that cost $200 less and the Meopta is a far, far better scope in every way. No plans to replace it unless Meopta somehow came out with a lighter, more compact version at the same cost and with the same performance. I do find the elevation turret to be a bit large but like their feel a bit more than the Cronus. Lettering is a bit small on the Meopta but I have issues reading anything close so your results may vary. I always look forward to getting behind this scope.
The illumination is visible in daylight but I wouldn't call it over the top bright. It's usable. The reticle itself is sharp, not too small and not too large. Thinking back, I have no problem using it from say 8X up but I'd have to go back and take notes. This is the reticle I have:
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0278/1626/3766/files/reticle-MRad-RD.pdf?v=1659694392