-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Rifle Scopes New Meopta Scope - Optika6
- Thread starter Weatherbee
- Start date
I interrupt this discussion to once again thank @koshkin for always cutting through the stupid bullshit/marketing hype and just telling us the truth. MUCH appreciated, Ilya! If we ever meet, I am buying you something; a beer, a meal of your choice, or a pass to Disneyland for all of the money and time you have saved me in scope purchases.
Until you mentioned Disneyland, I was going to ask where you are based...
Either way, you are welcome.
Light transmission number, if properly defined and understood, are useful metrics for engineers. Before we had commonly available high quality anti-reflection coatings, there were also worthwhile for consumers.
In the modern marketplace, getting proper AR coatings procured is trivial and even inexpensive scopes use very good coatings. While there still are some difference here, by and large, there are a few places who specialize on coatings deposition and everyone sends lenses to them.
Meopta happens to be one of the companies that specializes on coatings. The stuff they use on Meostars and all is absolutely world class, so I expect everything they market to have proper coatings.
ILya
I’ve been lurking on this thread trying to get opinions on the 4.5-27 and how they perform in long range target shooting. Compared to the 56mm objective of the 5-30 is there a marked improvement of sight picture and quality between the 5-30 and the 4.5-27?
My experience with Meopta binos and an old hunting scope has been stellar glass and so-so mechanicals. These scopes look great to me, hopefully the internals hold up.
thanks, I ended up getting the 3-18x50, it’s been great so far. I’m not very up to speed with scopes but I have meostar binos and spotter and have been extremely impressed, Meopta has kept me very happy with what I do
We are hoping for a July early Aug. delivery of the Optika5's. I will pass along my impressions once I get my hands on them. As some of you know and ILYA does as well, I will give you my honest impressions. I plan to use this optic on 2 hunting rifles and 1 of the rimfire scopes too. I have had an Optika6 on a pellet rifle and 22LR which worked great because of the parallax that adjusts down to 20 yards. The Optika5 is very well thought out and dialing it in with Strelok Pro is a huge bonus. Meopta does have a discount program for active Mil/LE. Bart
Are you able to provide any more details about them at this time? Are they optically similar to the Optika 6, but with different erector and 1 inch tube? I'm most curious about the weight, will it be a good hunting rifle weight.
Here's the info some of you were asking for on the Optika5 scopes.
I hope that means they have caught up on the 6's production come July. The Canadian distributor told me they were hoping to have better availability on the high demand models towards the end of summer.
Not going to lie, the Optika 5 as a package is less appealing overall. The price point may still make them appealing though.
I was excited about the Optika 5's until I saw the elevation adjustment. 60 MOA just ain't enough for gas guns which is where I'd be putting mine. I've got a couple of Grendel's that need scoped badly. I do like the weight and magnification adjustment ranges though. Still loving my Optika6 3-18x56 btw.
If you wanted to make it work you add a 20MOA base and off you go. Personally, for my AR's wearing Meopta's, I would go with the Optika6 and not look back. You already have experience with one so you should be able to see where I'm coming from? I have all my O6's sitting on bolt guns and couldn't be happier.
Attachments
Is it just me, or is the reticle choice confusing as all hell?
I want a simple MRAD based reticle. I've seen FFP duplex, FFP illuminated BDC's, SFP duplex based stuff, and all sorts of odd things based on a duplex or BDC. I can't seem to find a simple "these are the reticles in this scope and here's the subtentions". (Not to mention why anyone would want or need a FFP duplex? Or is that lazy website building and confusing model numbers?)
Their website for the US sucks balls and keeps timing out on me. Not sure what that's all about, along with cameraland not having a single picture of the reticle with the scopes they're selling.
I want a simple MRAD based reticle. I've seen FFP duplex, FFP illuminated BDC's, SFP duplex based stuff, and all sorts of odd things based on a duplex or BDC. I can't seem to find a simple "these are the reticles in this scope and here's the subtentions". (Not to mention why anyone would want or need a FFP duplex? Or is that lazy website building and confusing model numbers?)
Their website for the US sucks balls and keeps timing out on me. Not sure what that's all about, along with cameraland not having a single picture of the reticle with the scopes they're selling.
Googling "meopta reticles" is much easier than navigating their website
Meopta Sports Optics - European premium optics
www.meoptasportsoptics.com
Odd, that wasn't coming up on my searches but it did work. Thanks!
I'm just disappointed now. Looks like they're heavily based on hunting and MOA stuff. The MRAD ones look ok except all seem to have that horseshoe. I was looking for something to replace a Sig with the Dev-L in 3-18 for my .22 that had decent glass and would pararlax to 10 yards without being chinese. I love the dev-L for that purpose, but I find myself using the wind holds on the center dot quite often that looks like the horseshoe would interfere with (at least at my diminished metal capacity after hearing a timer beep).
I am still wholy confused as hell on just why anyone wants or needs a FFP duplex. Seems like they could cut out a lot of the product line to streamline it with only having a FFP available in subtentioned reticles and SFP only in the basic duplex/dot reticles.
Here's the info some of you were asking for on the Optika5 scopes.
That 4-20x44 Has gotten my attention, only wished it would come with tall uncapped turrets and zero stop. Would be the perfect scope for my hunting situations.
Here is a link to Meopta reticles that should be helpful
https://assets.website-files.com/5b...31b8_2020 Meopta Reticles BOOK online-min.pdf
https://assets.website-files.com/5b...31b8_2020 Meopta Reticles BOOK online-min.pdf
There may be a possibility to get exactly what you want in this scope. We are discussing with Kenton Industries for a Custom Ballistic Turret option. I have used their turrets on numerous rifles and found them to be right on with the data I provided.
Oh I'm all ears now I hear that, definitely looking forward to it. My rig is a lightweight hunting rig so I try to cut as much weight as I can where I can but still have the ability to shoot out 7-800 yards if needed.
D
Deleted member 121493
Guest
Ordered 5-30x56 mil for my .22 anchutz 2013 trainer...
Don't mean to dredge up an older thread and MODS address according.
For those that have spent some time behind any of the power ranges, does the elevation knob RTZ consistently? How about holding zero?
Thanks!
For those that have spent some time behind any of the power ranges, does the elevation knob RTZ consistently? How about holding zero?
Thanks!
No issues here.
used weekly since april, thousands of rounds.
used on a 22lr bergara b14r.
lots of dialing with no issues.
MY 5-30 FFP Optika 6 has had not issues with returning to zero being used ranges from 100-900m with my .260Rem. My only complaint is seating the windage dial cap to align precisely with markings on the scope.
No, but I just sent an email to customer service.
I don't want to squeeze the tube more than necessary.
(The online manual does not have that information).
Thanks.
Meopta Response
"Typically your best bet is to see what the manufacturer of the ring recommends but that data isn’t always available either. We suggest between 18 and 23 inch pounds for the ring half screws on all scope tubes.
Erik Muller
Product Specialist
Warehouse Manager
Meopta USA"
My problem continues, because he specifies a torque range and does not define a maximum, as for example "Anonymous Optics" does.
See the picture.
So ... they specify a maximum torque for the tube, less than the maximum torque for the rings. So my query, the maximum torque of the rings is not always correct for the tube.
Does the wrong torque affect the performance and durability of the scope?
Or all this is not important?
Regards.
"Typically your best bet is to see what the manufacturer of the ring recommends but that data isn’t always available either. We suggest between 18 and 23 inch pounds for the ring half screws on all scope tubes.
Erik Muller
Product Specialist
Warehouse Manager
Meopta USA"
My problem continues, because he specifies a torque range and does not define a maximum, as for example "Anonymous Optics" does.
See the picture.
So ... they specify a maximum torque for the tube, less than the maximum torque for the rings. So my query, the maximum torque of the rings is not always correct for the tube.
Does the wrong torque affect the performance and durability of the scope?
Or all this is not important?
Regards.
Attachments
Last edited:
With a bottom of the barrel budget brand like Arken, I can absolutely understand why their optics have a maximum torque spec. For a higher quality optic with likely more informed or experienced buyers, it may not be as necessary to hold the user’s hand throughout the process.
So it is learning by failure and success?
it seemed correct to me to know this data to do a professional job ..., in conclusion, the maximum torque would be 23 lb/in. according to the Meopta specialist.
Regards.
Last edited:
Just wanted to post this video of the Optika6 1-6x. Guy always has great productions.
Thanks for sharing that video. I’ve never seen him before but it was a very well put together review.
I was pretty disappointed that the early reports of dim illumination were confirmed in the Supersetca video.
That dude puts a TON of work into those reviews. He must work in the film/video industry. To create a scene that “looks” seamless he’s shooting multiple, multiple views of the same scene (diff views of subject, through-scope views, drone footage, close-ups, etc) and then editing them all together, often set to music. That shit is not easy.
Look at this thing!
Parts are funny (beginning & Mr. Hollywood), parts are not. But it’s pretty amazing from a technique viewpoint for some random gun video on YouTube.
Dude must not have kids! Tons of free time.
Back to the Meopta review vid. Even in this case, my YT axiom still holds: as the “polish” of the video goes up, either the usable information goes down and/or the effort required to get to the pearls of wisdom goes up. The Meopta review vid has great info, but is long.
Very rarely I see a short & entertaining video that provides great info. Prob because of some combo of YT favoring longer vids for monetization and garrulous hosts.
Thx for sharing that!
@carbonbased yeah SuperSetCA has been putting out quality videos for a long time. He took a hiatus for a couple years but nows he's back and he brought the shooting talents of Leograndis in, so it's better than ever.
Pretty good, not quite the level he shoots rifles at but I think he's still a USPSA GM in production or open, can't remember.
