New RF bino from Vectronix!!! Vector X

Can we talk more about the chicken? I saw the chicken dance post...please tell me this made it into production....

So.... In our talk with Philip from Vectronix he was very excited about the chicken icon idea. As I'm sure you read, it pops up when the rangefinder decides it needs to have it's compass calibrated. The idea is that calibrating the binos compass looks like doing the chicken dance. Philip really thought this was funny and it is my understanding that the feature will remain in production. I thought it seemed like a nice, small, memorable, shortcut icon to let the user know to calibrate. I like the idea but found it more funny ah-ha, than funny guffaw.
 
@DocUSMCRetired can we talk about blue tint? Is it in both barrels or just one? What is the severity - what's on the market that's comparable?
I think the blue tint has been slightly over blown. This is true for all the new stuff across the board. That was just a bad photo indoors.
 
Anyone, based on the label, where are they made or assembled?

Bottom of the unit says made in Slovakia in a couple of the pics that were posted.

VECTOR-X_12x42_UPRIGHT_rear_shadow__01__01.png


Edit: cranked up the brightness of the vectronix provided pic to make it easier to read.

VECTOR-X_12x42_UPRIGHT_rear_shadow__01__01__01.png
 
Last edited:
I think the blue tint has been slightly over blown. This is true for all the new stuff across the board. That was just a bad photo indoors.
The Vortex Fury samples that I looked through almost immediately gave me a headache. To a lesser extent the Sig Kilo 3000 and Vortex Fury 5000 HD samples were problematic for me. If both barrels were tinted blue, it'd probably have been better for me. I must just be sensitive to the blue tint or something, but those were legit deal killers for me.

Can you say whether or not the blue tint in these Vectronix is more, less, or the same to the Vortex & Sigs?
 
The Vortex Fury samples that I looked through almost immediately gave me a headache. To a lesser extent the Sig Kilo 3000 and Vortex Fury 5000 HD samples were problematic for me. If both barrels were tinted blue, it'd probably have been better for me. I must just be sensitive to the blue tint or something, but those were legit deal killers for me.

Can you say whether or not the blue tint in these Vectronix is more, less, or the same to the Vortex & Sigs?
If the furys gave you a headache, don't ever look through Sig 10ks! You'll have a lethal aneurysm for sure.
 
If the furys gave you a headache, don't ever look through Sig 10ks! You'll have a lethal aneurysm for sure.
10k are horrible in this regard! Fantastic laser, glass sharpness, contrast is actually pretty good. But the color rendition is flattened severely by the blue tint. I want truly alpha level glass with ab. If these have blue tint, the new Leica Pro still sounds like the best solution. They don't have any tint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lead ƒarmer
10k are horrible in this regard! Fantastic laser, glass sharpness, contrast is actually pretty good. But the color rendition is flattened severely by the blue tint. I want truly alpha level glass with ab. If these have blue tint, the new Leica Pro still sounds like the best solution. They don't have any tint.
Isn't the beam dispersion smaller in the .com's? I thought .com's were 1.2x0.5 mrad and Pros were 1.8x0.8 mrad? I've been holding off on a set of the .coms waiting for a better mouse trap.

I want exactly the same - alpha glass with solid laser, AB solver, and the vectronix display (or similar) with range & dope together.

I hope these Vectronix are the answer and that the tint is very minimal. I'm dying to spend the money, but I want to be able to glass for hours with these.
 
It'll be interesting how the glass in these stack up against the new glass in the kilo 10Ks. I looked through them last year at a match side by side my 10ks and there seemed to be no blue tint...
 
  • Love
Reactions: Snapper314
Thanks for the heads up! They're priced at $2899.00. They're already in the checkout basket, but I realize this could be an impulse buy. I think I'll hold out a little longer, perhaps for a deal or more hands-on photos and reviews.
I mean they do sound to good to be true. Lol.

However I ordered mine the second I saw the option. Haha.

That being said area419 posted a photo yesterday of their preproduction model. They said they would have a review up soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tshootz and ThisGuy
A couple of more months out.......I'm hoping June vs July........any updates on that?
Eurooptic said the actual Binos would be available a touch earlier, but the whole package (arca clamp and extenders) would likely be closer to July

Edit: this information is roughly a month old, I called and talked with euro as I pre ordered them when they first came out. So newer info may be available
 
Last edited:
Eurooptic said the actual Binos would be available a touch earlier, but the whole package (arca clamp and extenders) would likely be closer to July

Edit: this information is roughly a month old, I called and talked with euro as I pre ordered them when they first came out. So newer info may be available
Production models have started to roll into T&E. They look great!
 
Apologies if I missed this somewhere but does this statement:
“When you connect your VECTOR X with a Kestrel 5700 Ballistic weather meter, the environmental data measured by it will be used by default by your VECTOR X for calculating firing solutions.”
Include continuous wind values as well?

Not like it makes a difference, I already folded and ordered one anyway.

Nick
 
Apologies if I missed this somewhere but does this statement:
“When you connect your VECTOR X with a Kestrel 5700 Ballistic weather meter, the environmental data measured by it will be used by default by your VECTOR X for calculating firing solutions.”
Include continuous wind values as well?

Not like it makes a difference, I already folded and ordered one anyway.

Nick
No, because the wind has to be locked to update the range on the Kestrel.
 

I've seen a few at matches. But I don't like the fact there is no display and it requires an app.
I am unfamiliar with the device you have attached here, and I know for certain it will not work with AB Ecosystem devices.
 
I am unfamiliar with the device you have attached here, and I know for certain it will not work with AB Ecosystem devices.
I've seen it a few times, actually... All the 3 major matches I've shot in this season. I think people are manually inputting wind. But maybe someone here has a better explanation of their workflow. (I personally use a different anemometer and workflow for my Kestrel + HUD + Terrapin).

It would be a rather rad integration, though.
 
This is fabulous
I love my calypso....especially with the Garmin watch......that being said, I don't want to give that up. Looks like a second one will be needed.

Also understanding SW and product development, it'll probably take some time from initial launch, but I'll be patient. Ideally Kestrel integration would be great, especially if they could average wind and automate brackets within a few miles an hour live.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NiteQwill
LIDAR based wind measuring for 999$ ?
No, at that price its fairly useless with ranges of like 400 yards.

you're absolutely pouring gasoline on my baseless Garmin theories
I don't play with fire, I control it in a finely tuned precision manner. Much like our missile on missile ballistics etc.
 
Being reticle designer and proud member of project team, I am happy to tell that your concerns too were considered very carefully.

As FinnAccuracy original MSR / MSR2 riflescope reticles, Vector X MSR-DMR is designed with absolute guideline of fundamental binocular use: Reticle has to be non obstructive, clear and simple for any observing use - while offering precision and versatility when mil references are needed.
Reticle design notes:

- Upper 50% of FOV is perfectly clean for any observing use
- When display is not on, wide lower center part of reticle is clean without any etched structures
- Uaers will get full reticle functionality with both basic and range enhancer use
- "T" elements blend nicely with display, are kept very close to it for multiple reasons
- Outside "T" hairlines, reticle extensions are subtle dots and also toward outer areas of FOV. Dot weights are balanced so that they are not effecting general clear feel. Still, If wider or taller reference size than T is needed, eye catches on them immediately.
- Dot-grids can be used as layover mil reference on top of target. They are most obstructive elements of reticle, but are also located in outer FOV area. Grid element weights are light, for precision and daytime use.
- Center area cross is 1x1 mrad, with 1mrad stepped dot extensions. Center cross area is compact but still useful refence for many needs, calling shot corrections based on impact signature for instance.

For those who appreciate good optical quality, I can confirm that it is good! Rather early prototype Vector X test mule I benchmarked against Zeiss Victory RF 45mm objective version was already preforming same, if not slightly better than Zeiss. But Vector X optical system was still improved after that, so final version is even better. Image also remains good when pushed up to 17x with range enhancers. This includes other than bright daytime use, enhancer quality is also very good.

Edit - P.S.
Photo taken with 12x42 and mobile phone, no range enhancers. Reticle feel is very different against practical backgrounds - black&white reticle drawing changes its appearance to very highlighted. Only elements eye catches immediately in real life are center cross and compact mil-T:s, rest are there if needed and when eye concentrates on it. Bit hard to explain, but functionality and "real-life feel" on practical use is based on dimensioning, weights and locations on FOV as combination.

Phone adapters were also considered when eyepiece was designed, so almost any cheap Amazon phone adapter will work very nicely. Also display refresh rate matters and was taken into account, display won't flicker annoyingly when Vector X owners want to capture photos or video. Eyepiece is also very easy to remove for cleaning, very useful but rather rare feature in binoculars.
I was hoping you might be able to answer a couple reticle related questions for me. How thick are the reticle lines? How much of the target will the reticle obscure? I'm concerned with ranging small targets (woodchucks) at extreme ranges. The reticle documentation on your site does not include line thicknesses. Did the design team consider leaving the center of the main crosshairs open, this would have been preferable. Thank you!