This is perhaps the most minuscule thing I've ever challenged, but I don't think those are MF photos. I think PA has their own guys take photos of certain guns - including the PredatARs that are on their site. MF does a much, much better job than those pictures.
Ah, gotcha. Yes, that actually makes sense.
Well, that's one huge check in the "Choose (or keep) the PredatOBR" column. My PtOBR has an undersized receiver compared to standard diameter, so I can take any old 7.62/6.5/260 Barrel and have it turned down by .005. But I can at least do it.No they are not, neither are the Tobr handguards.
You think Mark would actually design something new with cross compatibility, saving his previous customers money....
The Steel insert SAMS or whatever the fuck its called requires a Barrel extension that is tapered, think of the new barrel extension slightly cone shaped, that wedges/locks it's self in place when you torque down the barrel nut. It's also aided by ball bearing detents, the two set screws you see on the bottom of steel Insert are actually detents.
Now, now . . . people shit on KAC for their improved -but incompatible with standard ARs - Bolt/barrel extension all of the time. Even though I have an SR-15, every time I see that being pointed out, it makes me smile knowing that the KAC fanboys are going to put on their special "go-to-(keyboard)-War" skinny jeans and flat billed hats to try and take down the person who dare question the divinity of Reed Knight.
Probably because PA is not bound to sell at MSRP.
That's interesting. So I guess you cannot just throw any 'standard' barrel in like you could on the PredatOBR.No they are not, neither are the Tobr handguards.
You think Mark would actually design something new with cross compatibility, saving his previous customers money....
The Steel insert SAMS or whatever the fuck its called requires a Barrel extension that is tapered, think of the new barrel extension slightly cone shaped, that wedges/locks it's self in place when you torque down the barrel nut. It's also aided by ball bearing detents, the two set screws you see on the bottom of steel Insert are actually detents.
I agree. It's the MLDS that can fog peoples' judgment on the stuff out of Leander. If it came from, literally, anyone else ... (eg geissele, KAC, Colt, etc).... I bet we'd see different responses and reception on the Hide.
This is a pretty good example. It makes it so much worse that his replies are always only 1/2 related to the substance of the question. Dude asks a question about a knife (that he thought highly enough of to pay $400) and gets a reply about the MRGG?
Man, if I focused my buying based on the personality of the company owner(s), there wouldn’t be that many companies that I bought from. I just try to remember that companies exist for one reason, and it is not to innovate or advance humanity or protect your rights. Companies exist to make money for the owners/shareholders. End. Full stop.
That's actually bullshit. While the E3 is a different pattern, you can still run a regular ar15 bolt in them on the almost zero percent chance your e3 bolt breaks.
Thank you. I was looking that up as this popped up because I thought you could run a reg bolt in one
I don't think it was misleading and I actually applaud them for trying. They submitted rifles (my understanding) to both the 6ARC bid and the 6.5 CM bid, I don't think that they won but they tried and maybe we get the benefit of their hard work.
The faster the lawnmower blade, the smoother the cut - Mark LaRue (approximately).
This rifle is based on our MRGG-S (Mid-Range Gas Gun – Sniper) design, submitted for use by SOCOM.
Easily my least favorite trend from the last few years. No one wants to watch you making faces while something happens in the video next to you.
He didn’t get the SOCOM MRGG-S contract but I think he’s still selling these to the DOD.
, Jesus and I still love you.
