Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I bought a slightly-used Cross from a Hide member a few weeks ago. The rifle was in like-new condition and fully functional when purchased, so no issues with the seller. I did a quick field strip to verify cleanliness and lubrication, and everything looked great.
This past week, I was dry-firing it during a conference call, and suddenly something felt "off" with the bolt lift. A bit of inspection showed that the cocking piece (to use the classic term) wasn't traveling fully forward upon each pull of the trigger. And then I found this when I pulled the bolt and attempted to drop the cocking piece by twisting the shroud:
View attachment 7500767
The cocking piece has two steel rollers to minimize friction - one at the its tip, and one roughly in its middle. The roller at the tip has left the building, and the pin that is supposed to retain it catches on the shroud and prevents full forward travel of the cocking piece.
View attachment 7500768
View attachment 7500770
The cocking piece has a small peened section that appears to be intended to capture the roller axle pin. Unfortunately, if the feature fails to do its job, that pin can move, potentially bind the cocking piece, and prevent full firing pin travel.
It appears that the other roller and axle pin are captured during assembly of the striker mechanism and has a lower likelihood of moving after assembly (so long as its peened feature is intact; if that feature fails, the pin could potentially prevent bolt travel).
I gotta say that this is an unsatisfactory condition; we've added four pieces to the assembly to reduce bolt lift effort, and the result is a potential loss of primary function. This might be an American rifle, but its German heritage is evident (Meanwhile, every mentor I've ever had in my engineering career is snickering at the fact that I've become the grumpy old guy who complains about shit being too complex.)
Anyways, now that I know more about what's going on in the striker assembly, it's no surprise that someone found a way to foul it up with some fine dirt/dust/cement/whatever and create enough drag to delay the firing process. And if indeed we're complicating that problem with parts not staying where they should, then I think we're witnessing the result of multiple root causes. Someone's gonna get beat over the head during the 8D process (assuming that Sig has one - evidence does not support this hypothesis).
If anyone at Sig is reading this, I'll be happy to show up and lead your guys through a full DFMEA at my normal consulting rate, but only if you promise that next time, you'll do the same before the product is launched
Dis Engineer Sassy.... I second his nomination to Sig's "Why it not go boom now?" team.
Wasn't there some type of bolt issue in September. Sig had started to ship the .308 version and then suddenly halted Cross shipments for about a month? I wonder if this failure is related to that earlier issue. I don't think Sig ever explained the problem.
It's true I witnessed it firsthand. I don't know if they said what the specific problem was but guns were pulled and bolts were either fixed or replaced I am not sure which. On Arf one of the Sig employees said is was a small number of rifles but gave no actual numbers.I don't know if anything was ever confirmed, but I remember that a few folks were told that there was a bolt related problem found with the initial Cabela's rifles and some had to be sent back. Sig didn't put anything out at that time and I don't think I ever saw anything official at the time, so it's hard to figure if it was just gunshop lore or if there was a problem.
View attachment 7513421
Just received this update asking to verify my information.
Shot mine yesterday- no downtime here.5-7 days isn’t too bad for a repair. The 14 weeks of total downtime since they issued the “stop use” message after I gave them what amounts to a $1500 tax-free loan sucks a bag of dicks though.
The barrel swap is as easy as an AR.Has anyone done barrel swap to one of @DAVETOOLEY CF barrels? I'm curious if the swap is as easy as advertised and if there is any minor weight savings to be had?
Shot mine today trigger smooth as butter breaks like glass.Shot mine yesterday- no downtime here.
Has anyone done barrel swap to one of @DAVETOOLEY CF barrels? I'm curious if the swap is as easy as advertised and if there is any minor weight savings to be had?
It shoots great very pleased!!I swapped barrels with another member here who had a 6.5 and wanted a .308. It's a very easy job, just like an AR barrel with no need to time for the gas block. I cut and shaped a stub of 2x4 to fit snugly as a mag well block. I'm sure that's not the recommended method, but it worked fine.
Edit: Swapped with PLX65, how's it shoot?
Hopefully they're able to fix everything with the first recall.
I hope so too, I still really want one!
As a mostly broke grad student its not super confidence inspiring to scrap my pennies together for one only to have it go down on me and become potentially unsafe. But hopefully it all gets sorted out by then.The recall wouldn't prevent me from buying one. I've continued to shoot mine. The failure was hangfire/trigger issue. Follow safe firearm practices and you'll be fine until Sig can get them all back and get them fixed.
As a mostly broke grad student its not super confidence inspiring to scrap my pennies together for one only to have it go down on me and become potentially unsafe. But hopefully it all gets sorted out by then.
YesNice! 5-7 business days doesn’t sound too bad. Did you just receive this today?
What's up with the Cross's on gun broker selling for $2,000 and $2,500 on gun broker? I mean if that's whats happening I may have to list mine and buy one again when they are re-released. Crazy prices for sure
Not yet. Still waitingAnyone received the box from sig yet?
@brazz04I found a cross in creedmoor at Bass Pro in Round Rock Texas. Apparently it was there for two weeks. I attached some weight pictures for reference. I have ARC low rings on the Leupold Mark 6, but I need slightly higher rings to clear the scope a bit more. Also added a picture of the whole package including my dead air Sandman S. Looks like it will be right at 11lbs by the time I add a bipod. The bolt lift makes me realize how terrible my remington 700 really was. Hope to get out and shoot it this week.
View attachment 7438378
View attachment 7438381View attachment 7438382
It clears, but it's so close that the nub on the magnification ring hit the pic rail when turned, which only allowed the magnification to go to about 12x. I love the mediums, it puts it high enough to use the cheek adjustment as well.@brazz04
Did the ARC lows clear the scope objective? I have a Mark 6 on the way and am shopping for rings now, but hard to tell what height will work.
Mine looks exactly the same.I disassembled the bolt for the first time. I wasn’t sure if I have reassembled it right and there’s a gap between the striker shroud and the bolt assembly. Can someone confirm whether this is right? View attachment 7530499
Thanks! I didn’t remember if there was a gap, thanks for verifying for me.Mine looks exactly the same.
It's odd that some are not getting bid on at $1,500, and others are being bid up to $2,500.
View attachment 7517363
nope... not a word. But does that really surprise anyone?Has anyone received the box yet? It has been six weeks...