Re: New Weaver tactical 3-15x50
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Fx1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Im way more interested in this than the PST, the PST is meh. Weaver glass is some of the best and way above its price range.
Reviews of the PST so far have been around all of the bells and whistles added to it.
Give me high quality glass and image in a rugged design and ill take that over stuff i dont need anyday </div></div>
What bells and whistles are you referring to? Is there something on the PST that isn't on the Weaver that I'm not aware of? Besides the superior reticle? Does the Weaver have a zero stop? I don't see how that could be seen as a negative.
Actually, the Weaver has 2 colors for illumination, the PST only has one. I don't know if you would call that a bell or a whistle. AND the Weaver has the added bell/whistle of the pull-up/push-down turrets AND the zero set without the use of tools. The PST has just the boring plain jane really nice positive turrets. Maybe the Weaver has more bells and whistles than the PST now that I think about it! Meh!
BTW, when you say the PST is "meh" are you speaking from experience of actually using one? Or are you just getting emotionally invested in the Weaver and it makes you feel better knocking it's competitor?
Glass quality should be last in priority on a tacticle scope, but it sounds like you have other purposes in mind since the "bells and whistles" you refer to are mainly used for tactical shooting which it sounds like you don't need "anyday".
Some of us folks on here do actually use these "bells and whistles". Just so you know.
Do you have some information that the design of the Weaver is as rugged or more rugged than the PST? Do tell!
BTW, I think the Weaver Tactical looks like a nice option at this price range.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Fx1</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Im way more interested in this than the PST, the PST is meh. Weaver glass is some of the best and way above its price range.
Reviews of the PST so far have been around all of the bells and whistles added to it.
Give me high quality glass and image in a rugged design and ill take that over stuff i dont need anyday </div></div>
What bells and whistles are you referring to? Is there something on the PST that isn't on the Weaver that I'm not aware of? Besides the superior reticle? Does the Weaver have a zero stop? I don't see how that could be seen as a negative.
Actually, the Weaver has 2 colors for illumination, the PST only has one. I don't know if you would call that a bell or a whistle. AND the Weaver has the added bell/whistle of the pull-up/push-down turrets AND the zero set without the use of tools. The PST has just the boring plain jane really nice positive turrets. Maybe the Weaver has more bells and whistles than the PST now that I think about it! Meh!
BTW, when you say the PST is "meh" are you speaking from experience of actually using one? Or are you just getting emotionally invested in the Weaver and it makes you feel better knocking it's competitor?
Glass quality should be last in priority on a tacticle scope, but it sounds like you have other purposes in mind since the "bells and whistles" you refer to are mainly used for tactical shooting which it sounds like you don't need "anyday".
Some of us folks on here do actually use these "bells and whistles". Just so you know.
Do you have some information that the design of the Weaver is as rugged or more rugged than the PST? Do tell!
BTW, I think the Weaver Tactical looks like a nice option at this price range.