Re: nightforce or uso?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: RussW1911</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Rem700p</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: brando.john</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ninpo2006</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you can afford a USO then get one. Otherwise get a Nightforce and say bad things about USO so you can feel better.</div></div>
Or if your a yuppy asshole and buy things just because they are more expensive and it makes you feel like you have a better trophy to show off to your friends, then get a USO </div></div>
Wait...how does that work if you get comparable scopes? They cost about the same. </div></div>
Show me a $3000+ Nightforce....... I bet it will track, hold, and focus. Same as the 1500, 1800, and 2200 ones. </div></div>
So all USO scopes cost $3000+?
I owned 3 NF scopes and 2 out of 3 failed and had issues. As I recall they both had tracking problems. I got them repaired and then traded all of them for other things(I was happy with my Zeiss at the time). The glass was great and the build was excellent. But just because I had issues, doesn't mean I'm going to go and bad mouth them. Even with the problems that I personally had with the scopes, I would still recommend them. I was able to have the 3rd that had no problems.
For what it's worth, when I say comparable scopes, I'm talking about the NF F1 and the SN3 3.2-17. Unless you know of other NF FFP scopes.
