OK let's get into the weeds. Here are a couple of quotes from the decision of the lower court in Nevada, addressing Trump's claims of fraud:
"“The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”
Also from this decision - the Trump campaign, "“did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted, or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud, nor...in an amount sufficient to raise reasonable doubt as to the outcome of the election,”.
Now let's go to the unanimous Nevada Supreme Court decision, affirming the lower court's ruling. Addressing Trump's argument that the lower court had failed to properly consider and give weight to their evidence of voter fraud, the Court expressly rejected this argument. It held: “To prevail on this appeal, appellants must demonstrate error of law, findings of fact not supported by substantial evidence or an abuse of discretion in the admission or rejection of evidence by the district court,” the Nevada Supreme Court order said. “We are not convinced they have done so.”
Again the court specifically considered the evidence submitted by Trump and rejected it, finding no credible evidence of voter fraud. And the state Supreme Court concluded, in a 6-0 decision that the Court's findings of fact were correct.
Now let's look at the GOP's lawsuit in Arizona alleging voter fraud. After listening to a day and a half of testimony in which the plaintiffs presented their evidence the trial court concluded that there was no credible evidence of voter fraud On appeal, the Arizona Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Chief Justice Robert Brutinel ruled that plaintiffs failed to "present any evidence of 'misconduct,' 'illegal votes' or that the Biden Electors 'did not in fact receive the highest number of votes for office,'" he wrote — "let alone establish any degree of fraud or a sufficient error rate that would undermine the certainty of the election results." Sounds to me like the ruling was based on the evidence.
I could go on, but you and I both know that would be pointless. It doesn't really matter that none of Trump's or the GOP's lawsuits have been successful. Or that Trump's own Attorney General concedes that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Or that the individual Trump put in charge of cybersecurity says the voting machines weren't hacked. Or that state election officials and the company that makes the machines agree). Because after all Sidney Powell, a right wing talk show host (and sometime lawyer) says Cuba, Venezuela, the Clinton Foundation, the billionaire George Soros and Antifa stole the election from Trump.
