Re: REVIEW!!!!! Vortex Razor 5-20x50
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Magnumdood</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hunter223</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Seriously consider this scope when looking at the other big boys, I think most will find it compares very favorably to S&B, PH, and Ziess. You may find one area that one of the other scopes is better, <span style="text-decoration: underline">but I think this is the best all-around scope I've seen bar-none</span>. And a BIG THANK YOU to Scott over at Liberty Optics.
Hunter</div></div>
In your Red-Bull induced hysteria, I missed this little gem. Quite a statement considering the optics you named. I think you've generated enough attention that there are quite a few folks waiting to see how well the Vortex works as a Base Ball Bat (Low Light testing). </div></div>
O no, no Red-bull for me thank you, that's for the REAL scope testers
I prefer Monster and no, not diet either, I want the real stuff.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: rath</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So, what I am getting at is, all it takes is just to pick it up and look through it and mess with it a little bit, and you know you've got a serious optic on your hands.</div></div>
Really, maybe you should call LL and tell him not to bother with his testing....
I'd like to know things like does it track? Is it repeatable? Can it withstand abuse, both vigorous and normal bumps/knocks?
Are you planning on running a box test + tracking test on yours?
Thanks, Rath </div></div>
Sorry Rath I missed your question among all the other post. Yessir I will be doing all the std. tracking test, at least 10mils in all directions and I will take some leveling equpiment to check that it tracks perfectly vertically and horizontally. I will also, be shooting from multiple ranges so, I'll check on repeatablity as well. I'll bump it around some more than it will normally see for me and, check zero etc after that.
Thanks Rath