The fact its gone on this long its not good for Kyle, and that they want to re-watch the late-entered & altered drone video is also a bad sign.
So a question for the smarter IT folks...There are apparently two files of the video - one 4MB and one 11 MB, the first was given to the defense, the later shown to the jury after it "came back from the crime lab". I'm tech-stupid, but common sense tells something is different about these two files and cause for concern. It may make the judge "queasy", but how far will it be pursued after trial? The judge seems to make it clear (sic) "there will be severe consequences if the video shown is not legit". So if Kyle is found guilty on the provocation charge because of this, and the video is then proven invalid after trial, can the judge still throw out the verdict with prejudice or just demand re-trial?
The jury didn't ask to view the latest hi res video. This was something the judge did for the defendant's motion for mistrial with prejudice. I think it was to address #4 in the motion.