This witness is brutally answering the prosecutor. He's not not friendly at all to the prsecution.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can someone fill me in; What's the significance of whether or not Rittenhouse "re-racked" (
only that bicep dude said he did. just another one of the lies he told.Can someone fill me in; What's the significance of whether or not Rittenhouse "re-racked" () the rifle ? If there was any actual questioning or commentary about it, I missed it.
She was hot........But she had the personality of a piece of cold, white, toast.She was hot , thinking about her slapping the cuffs on me and ...............
Thxonly that bicep dude said he did. just another one of the lies he told.
Can someone fill me in; What's the significance of whether or not Rittenhouse "re-racked" () the rifle ? If there was any actual questioning or commentary about it, I missed it.
UUMmmmm....I'm sorry but "news journalist" WILL inject their opinions QUITE often into news stories.
LBC said it was Bicep Dude. I would hope that the defense would shit all over him to the Jury, due to his "societal indiscretions". In other words, lying (or the appearance of it) is of secondary importance.It comes to finding the witness's other statements can be factual if this statement was either a lie or a fabrication. Lie once and you're a liar. At least in court.
I thought I read that he had been charged?LBC said it was Bicep Dude. I would hope that the defense would shit all over him to the Jury, due to his "societal indiscretions". In other words, lying (or the appearance of it) is of secondary importance.
Of primary importance is the fact that A; He is a Felon that was in the posession of a firearm and B; He needs to be charged with attempted murder (of Rittenhouse).
I'm willing to bet he was given immunity in exchange for his testimony.LBC said it was Bicep Dude. I would hope that the defense would shit all over him to the Jury, due to his "societal indiscretions". In other words, lying (or the appearance of it) is of secondary importance.
Of primary importance is the fact that A; He is a Felon that was in the posession of a firearm and B; He needs to be charged with attempted murder (of Rittenhouse).
Could be, there's a lot that I'm not up to speed on.I thought I read that he had been charged?
Serious (probably dumb) question; Is that within the law ?I'm willing to bet he was given immunity in exchange for his testimony.
Thats because at the last minuets of their lives they found religion and became hole y.Funny, they didn't look like that on the M.E. table! Mac
Considering city DAs routinely drop felony weapons charges to get a plea on more minor stuff I’d say unfortunately yes.Serious (probably dumb) question; Is that within the law ?
Yes, happens all of the time. They give the "small fish" immunity so they can make the case against the big fish.Serious (probably dumb) question; Is that within the law ?
Rosenbaum almost looks hispanic in this...
Journalism 101. Someone reading this should not see you in it. That's editorial... across the hall. Of course in todays world this no longer exists in MSM.UUMmmmm....I'm sorry but "news journalist" WILL inject their opinions QUITE often into news stories.
Case in point: SEAL Eddie Gallagher...The team medic got immunity for testifying, then said on the stand HE was the one that killed that guy in AFG/IRAQ (wherever it was). The JAG was a tad pissed.
Another prosecutorial travesty and a complete abandonment of a soldier by his leadership.Case in point: SEAL Eddie Gallagher...The team medic got immunity for testifying, then said on the stand HE was the one that killed that guy in AFG/IRAQ (wherever it was). The JAG was a tad pissed.
Another prosecutorial travesty and a complete abandonment of a soldier by his leadership.
I hope they blow up that bitChes twitter pageRosenbaum almost looks hispanic in this...
It's almost like they're intending to make Rosenbaum NOT look like a convicted pedo ginger who loves to shout the "n word" in public?
I've been wondering about the "re-rack" for awhile, because the prosecution has really been fishing for it from a number of comments/questions throughout the trial. I also note the defense has been avidly discounting it at every turn. I've since figured that maybe the prosecution is somehow trying to demonstrate that Kyle could have only known to rerack if he pulled the trigger at Grosskreutz while his hands were raised, misfire noted, then rerack. So then the prosecution can claim, "See?! Kyle attempted to kill him while surrendering." Which legally probably really doesn't matter for self-defense if they still have the weapon in their hand, but as we've seen from this prosecutor, his notion of self-defense is that you have to let them shoot you first, before you can defend yourself...as we've also seen, a surrender does not guarantee anything, because Grosskreutz still tried to shoot Kyle, despite, so if Kyle still considered Grosskreutz a threat, even with his hands raised, Gaige's subsequent actions prove that out.Can someone fill me in; What's the significance of whether or not Rittenhouse "re-racked" () the rifle ? If there was any actual questioning or commentary about it, I missed it.
I have not seen or heard anything about Gage(shot in arm guy) being charged with attempted murder. But, he’s trying to sue the city for $10,000,000. This pice of shit, thinks he is entitled to $10 million.
![]()
Protester shot by Kyle Rittenhouse in Kenosha is now suing Wisconsin authorities
The lawsuit alleges that authorities in Kenosha not only knew that armed vigilantes planned to patrol the protest attended by Black Lives Matter supporters, but also encouraged their participation.www.npr.org
Which, if my guess about the prosecutor's theory is correct, is why Binger followed up with questions about if it would be possible that the last fired round could possibly fail to eject, where a similar re-rack would be required to eject the empty, thus "proving" his theory about Kyle pulling the trigger prior, fail to shoot at the hapless, innocent Gaige, requiring a rerack...all disregarding that Gaige was still really a threat to Kyle, despite his fake surrender, and Gaige clearly demonstrated when he still tried to shoot Kyle.FWIW, the babe who collected the brass didn't find any live rounds.
Does anyone else thinks the jurors could be getting upset due to the large number of times they had to leave the courtroom due entirely because of the prosecutor's actions alone?
Something to think about.
Yes. By all accounts, the round ejected from the chamber of Grosskreutz's Glock by someone at the scene where they applied the tourniquet.Wasn't the only "unfired" round a .40cal??
Yes. By all accounts, the chambered round from Grosskreutz's Glock.
That is what I heard the woman detective testify to.Wasn't the only "unfired" round a .40cal??
Yes. Ever been on a Jury ? That kind of shit stacks up fast. This prosecutor is really a piece of work. Glad he's in the position though. He's almost singlehandedly giving the win to team "D".Does anyone else thinks the jurors could be getting upset due to the large number of times they had to leave the courtroom due entirely because of the prosecutor's actions alone?
Something to think about.
Which, if my guess about the prosecutor's theory is correct, is why Binger followed up with questions about if it would be possible that the last fired round could possibly fail to eject, where a similar re-rack would be required to eject the empty, thus "proving" his theory about Kyle pulling the trigger prior, fail to shoot at the hapless, innocent Gaige, requiring a rerack...all disregarding that Gaige was still really a threat to Kyle, despite his fake surrender, and Gaige clearly demonstrated when he still tried to shoot Kyle.
Serious (probably dumb) question; Is that within the law ?
How soon we forget... ALL of Hillary's accomplices/co-conspirators were given immunity for their testimony... then the FBI turned around and said.. we aren't charging Hillary because nobody would try the case.Yes, happens all of the time. They give the "small fish" immunity so they can make the case against the big fish.