It's actually very functional and useable. It ain't TT or ZCO glass, but it's more than useable, with the faintest hint of CA (I have a 5-25). Low light performance is actually quite good.
Yes, I actually had no doubt. I'm enjoying this thread enough that I posted a link to that thread, just to contrast the opinions in this thread, with the opinions it that one.
That thread has a few guys looking through the MK5 side by side with the ATACR, and giving the MK5 the win for glass.
Also a few comparisons with S&B.
I was just wondering who's full of crap, these guys or those guys. ?