Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We want to see your skills! Post a video between now and November 1st showing what you've learned from Frank's lessons and 3 people will be selected to win a free shirt. Good luck everyone!
Create a channel Learn moreYou could always end this pointless argument once and for all by just recommending a particular IOR model for LL to test and report back on. Why would you not jump at the chance to prove him wrong and show him to be a fool? Why are you being so obtuse about this?
No Frank I do not discount anything you say. Dude you are a world class guy. Not many people have reached the level of expertise you have. My hat is off to you. You are truely the man. And I mean that with all due respect. But your opinion of what constitutes testing may and probably does differ from their opinion of what constitutes testing. So you are not wrong in any definition of the word, but neither are they. If you dislike the scopes or any scope for what ever reason you are entitled to that opinion. But Frank, we are entitled to our opinions as well. regardless of how ill conceived our manner of testing, whether or not you think we tested the right things. It doesn't matter. My opinion is that the scope I have is a good scope. Your opinion is that it is a piece of crap. Ok, I understand and have no issues with it. But neither of us are wrong.
Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma - which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition.
Steve Jobs
Dude its hard to take anything you say at all now. You played essentially the race card, your opinion is worth less than a bag of shit in my "opinion".
YEPMy take on this subject is that the "new hot thing" always gets the majority of the attention around here (naturally). S&B just hasn't had a new product release (at a viable price point) in a couple of years.
The S&B 3-20x scope is a great piece of kit in my opinion, and I'm running one on my rifle. Save for concerns I've read about some limited quality control issues on their turrets, I'm very happy with the MTC turrets. I like the simplicity and functionality of the design: having a harder click on every tenth click makes it really easy to dial up, say, 6 mils without ever looking at the turret. The zero stop is nice, as is the pop-up piece on the top of the turret to indicate that you're on the second revolution. Obviously the glass is top notch. But, something that doesn't seem to get a whole lot of attention in this debate is the reticle choices. I'm a big fan of the H2CMR reticle, and I haven't found a truly comparable reticle with the other manufacturers.
So, I don't think S&B has necessarily fallen out of favor, it's just that they haven't had the "new hot thing" in a couple of years now (since the introduction of the 3-20x scope). Sure, they released a 3-27x scope, but that optic is well out of the price range that most of us would ever consider paying, and doesn't get much attention because of it. As such, there isn't a whole lot to talk about on the S&B front that hasn't already been talked about. But, that doesn't mean that their product is necessarily sub-par. I'm still very happy with my scope.
It seems that the Beast is the talk of the forums right now, since it was the new hot thing from another prominent manufacturer. But, if you give it a couple of years to mature as a product, the Beast probably won't get as much forum attention, either (even though I hear that it is also a fine scope).
Apparently S&B's are the only scope worth owning.....everything else is substandard.
That's not what is being said. What is being stated is that S&B has been the standard in which other high end optics have been judged by. If you can't compare or beat the biggest dog on the block, how can you call yourself top tier?!
There are a lot of great scopes out there. In no particular order:
1) S&B
2) Nightforce
3) Bushnell line (XRS, ERS, HDMR)
4) Vortex Razor
5) Zeiss Hensoldt
etc.... etc....
That is just the tip of the ice berg. But there are a few I wouldn't even consider putting on a list unless it was for pellet guns and air soft.....
Just the other day you were touting countersniper and barska scopes. TELL US WHAT YOU RELLY THINK!
I've been saying S&B's are substandard for years.Apparently S&B's are the only scope worth owning.....everything else is substandard.
That's not what is being said. What is being stated is that S&B has been the standard in which other high end optics have been judged by. If you can't compare or beat the biggest dog on the block, how can you call yourself top tier?!
There are a lot of great scopes out there. In no particular order:
1) S&B
2) Nightforce
3) Bushnell line (XRS, ERS, HDMR)
4) Vortex Razor
5) Zeiss Hensoldt
etc.... etc....
That is just the tip of the ice berg. But there are a few I wouldn't even consider putting on a list unless it was for pellet guns and air soft.....
you could always end this pointless argument once and for all by just recommending a particular ior model for ll to test and report back on. Why would you not jump at the chance to prove him wrong and show him to be a fool? Why are you being so obtuse about this?
This is the point for the mentally challenged...
None of my personal opinions were formed in a vacuum... if I have not put my hand on it, I generally don't comment. You'd be hard pressed to find something I have not touched at some point.
.
Then want is your formula for testing?? What happens if the IOR passes it? Aside from physical abuse if it is clear and tracks as designed then what else do you do? Scopes have been offered for evaluation , yet your response sounds less than enthuastic.I have always said,
Ownership does not equal competence ... just because you owned a brand, and it worked for you, doesn't make you an authority.
History shows, NF, S&B break far less than most... there is a paper trail here, so, one off experiences can be dismissed. I don't shoot it over a weekend and call it good. When I test things I have a model and formula that is proven to demonstrate if there is an issue. Most "owners" never do this... just read any post on about someone and their ballistic program. We always ask if you checked and calibrated their scope and the answer is always NO... that speaks volumes to ownership. When the Gen 1 IOR came out, they were dying across the board at 200 rounds. If you never shot that many rounds through it, or never it checked it after the first day, how would you know if it was right or not.
My prejudice has a reason, that reason is well documented, I did not form my opinion out of thin air.
Last time I checked, companies were not calling you for your opinion on this matter, or any other. (shortcut)
I have always said,
Ownership does not equal competence ... just because you owned a brand, and it worked for you, doesn't make you an authority.
History shows, NF, S&B break far less than most... there is a paper trail here, so, one off experiences can be dismissed. I don't shoot it over a weekend and call it good. When I test things I have a model and formula that is proven to demonstrate if there is an issue. Most "owners" never do this... just read any post on about someone and their ballistic program. We always ask if you checked and calibrated their scope and the answer is always NO... that speaks volumes to ownership. When the Gen 1 IOR came out, they were dying across the board at 200 rounds. If you never shot that many rounds through it, or never it checked it after the first day, how would you know if it was right or not.
My prejudice has a reason, that reason is well documented, I did not form my opinion out of thin air.
Last time I checked, companies were not calling you for your opinion on this matter, or any other. (shortcut)
Part of the equation is when you talk to the manufacturer.
if they can address the issues, and they point out, "well we changed, A, B, C, and found that our failures were, located here so we changed it" ...
Read my post about Tangent Theta, they openly and without prompting broke down, step by step, everything they addressed, and what they changed. They did not blow smoke, they said, We changed A, B, C... that tells the tale just as much as checking one scope. Which honestly one scope is much too small a sample, but we work with what we can. Your interview with the company is just as important as you going out and shooting something.
If you pay any attention you see I state up front that I put at least 1000 rounds through stuff before I report on it. Each time I got to the range I block a portion of it to test, and retest these scopes. It's one of the reasons why, you'll see the same scope on 3 different rifles. I repeat the process from mounting to zero multiple times. I have had people send me a product and expect me to report on it the follow the weekend. When they push for something like that, I return it and never say a word, cause it's not how I operate.
OK. When will the IOR evaluation begin?
You live an Hour from Denver, what part of TX is that... Val from IOR is in Littleton.
I will consider it around March, I have to see what their "conditions" are... if the idea is to shoot it once and call it great, then I have very little interest in that.
But once the weather breaks here,
You're assuming I would invite you ... the range I use is private.
Why wouldn't you? I'm a nice guy.
Well now if Frank needs to be "supervised" in order to do this test. I think I need to be there to supervise the scope supervisors. Then it can be a real foot stompin good time.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Inquiring minds want to know.Again, that one guy, or the whole group... you say 10 SF Group, like they are all using it, and if so, on what rifle ?
I'll buy tickets to that show!!!
I'm a button pusher, once I see what ticks people off I just can't help it, I'm going to push that button, but know this. I respect everyone here, even you Night force guys.
There are a lot of great scopes out there. In no particular order:
1) S&B
2) Nightforce
3) Bushnell line (XRS, ERS, HDMR)
4) Vortex Razor
5) Zeiss Hensoldt
etc.... etc....
Apparently S&B's are the only scope worth owning.....everything else is substandard.
Not to side track you guys from your pissing matches, but I have an actual question..
I'm planning on buying a uses s&b soon. Anyone have an exact date when they switched from the 30 year to 2 up warranty? The one I'm looking at was made 2 years ago about.
I agree 100%. Just got the S&B 3-20X MTC with MSR reticle. Having used it several times, I canceled my BEAST order from last March and picked up an S&B 5-25X MTC with MSR to have matching scopes. I'm thrilled and it will free up a BEAST for someone, if they ever materialize!My take on this subject is that the "new hot thing" always gets the majority of the attention around here (naturally). S&B just hasn't had a new product release (at a viable price point) in a couple of years.
The S&B 3-20x scope is a great piece of kit in my opinion, and I'm running one on my rifle. Save for concerns I've read about some limited quality control issues on their turrets, I'm very happy with the MTC turrets. I like the simplicity and functionality of the design: having a harder click on every tenth click makes it really easy to dial up, say, 6 mils without ever looking at the turret. The zero stop is nice, as is the pop-up piece on the top of the turret to indicate that you're on the second revolution. Obviously the glass is top notch. But, something that doesn't seem to get a whole lot of attention in this debate is the reticle choices. I'm a big fan of the H2CMR reticle, and I haven't found a truly comparable reticle with the other manufacturers.
So, I don't think S&B has necessarily fallen out of favor, it's just that they haven't had the "new hot thing" in a couple of years now (since the introduction of the 3-20x scope). Sure, they released a 3-27x scope, but that optic is well out of the price range that most of us would ever consider paying, and doesn't get much attention because of it. As such, there isn't a whole lot to talk about on the S&B front that hasn't already been talked about. But, that doesn't mean that their product is necessarily sub-par. I'm still very happy with my scope.
It seems that the Beast is the talk of the forums right now, since it was the new hot thing from another prominent manufacturer. But, if you give it a couple of years to mature as a product, the Beast probably won't get as much forum attention, either (even though I hear that it is also a fine scope).
It would be nice to have reps from the top tier scope manufacturers step in and offer their opinion as to why they feel their products are top notch. They're here, yet they're quiet.
You live an Hour from Denver, what part of TX is that... Val from IOR is in Littleton.
I will consider it around March, I have to see what their "conditions" are... if the idea is to shoot it once and call it great, then I have very little interest in that.
But once the weather breaks here,
I'm a button pusher, once I see what ticks people off I just can't help it, I'm going to push that button, but know this. I respect everyone here, even you Night force guys.
Troll (Internet) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally[3][4] or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[5] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[6]"
Congratulations, Phil...you've just admitted to being a troll.
While this thread is our first (and likely last) interaction, I would like you to know that from your first posts here, I inferred that you would not be offering anything worth reading. You did not disappoint. You sir, have the distinct honor of being the very first member of my "ignore list".
"I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
I didn't "Start" the argument. I just enhanced it. I"m proud to be on your list, everybody needs to be on a list somewhere. Come to think of it, I'm on a few list.
1. Your List.
2. 20+ years Army retirees with a service connected injury
3. The proud IOR owners list.
4. The 95th Training Division Expert Marksman list.
5. The list as one of the first American soldiers to be invited to the french Commando school as an Rifle instructor.
6. The first male to win the great American purple hull pea cook off. ( three time champ)
Hell The lists goes on and on!
Troll (Internet) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally[3][4] or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[5] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[6]"
Congratulations, Phil...you've just admitted to being a troll.
While this thread is our first (and likely last) interaction, I would like you to know that from your first posts here, I inferred that you would not be offering anything worth reading. You did not disappoint. You sir, have the distinct honor of being the very first member of my "ignore list".
"I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
Yeh, a jack wagon, like a said: Urban Dictionary: jack wagon
But troll works also. I agree. Maybe we should do a poll what people really think? But that would derail this thread. Kudos to "notso" for his input. Excellent stuff.
I didn't "Start" the argument. I just enhanced it. I"m proud to be on your list, everybody needs to be on a list somewhere. Come to think of it, I'm on a few list.
1. Your List.
2. 20+ years Army retirees with a service connected injury
3. The proud IOR owners list.
4. The 95th Training Division Expert Marksman list.
5. The list as one of the first American soldiers to be invited to the french Commando school as an Rifle instructor.
6. The first male to win the great American purple hull pea cook off. ( three time champ)
Hell The lists goes on and on!
I think IOR is the only one being "called out". We've already determined that S&B is "not imploding" and NF is still coming out with the next big thing in the Beast.