We'll just agree to disagree on this..50 muzzle blast isn't that terrible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We'll just agree to disagree on this..50 muzzle blast isn't that terrible.
I have tinnitus but I seriously doubt it is from the .50. More likely the T55/54 that fired the main gun next to me in Baghdad, the RPG, mortars, 107 rockets, DSHK, ZPU-1, my 240 gunner and some guys that wanted to play. I almost forgot my cannon (yes, I have a cannon).Really? And you don't have tinnitus yet? That amazes me. Especially if you run the AR50 muzzle brake which is what I have.
Ha! Well yeah! It would be from all that then. No wonder you say the 50 muzzle blast isn't bad. Cuz compared to all that it's not.I have tinnitus but I seriously doubt it is from the .50. More likely the T55/54 that fired the main gun next to me in Baghdad, the RPG, mortars, 107 rockets, DSHK, ZPU-1, my 240 gunner and some guys that wanted to play. I almost forgot my cannon (yes, I have a cannon).
Guys seem to be missing the point , that there’s more to it than just sound and its affect on their ears.
I wish muzzle brakes weren't so popular. I can't fathom why people choose to use a device on their rifle that causes irreparable permanent damage to their hearing?! A suppressor is a much better solution.
Do what you want, but hearing loss is permanent, so I’d rather shoot a gun I can handle, instead of use a brake that causes irreparable damage. Especialy 223-6.5mm. Really?Better performance and they have good hearing protection?
Not sure about a 50, but have brakes on everything from 223-30cals and I like them.
My MSAs have done a good job with noise and I also have some silicone ear plugs kicking around my range bag just in case.
TBI? I’d have to see some studies to buy off on that one, that’s smells a little like fudlore
Do what you want, but hearing loss is permanent, so I’d rather shoot a gun I can handle, instead of use a brake that causes irreparable damage. Especialy 223-6.5mm. Really?
Protecting Warfighters from Blast Injury
Developing strong, pragmatic and principled national security and defense policies.www.cnas.org
Don’t Go Deaf — Understand Risks of Concussive Hearing Loss « Daily Bulletin
Did you know you can damage your hearing even if you are wearing the best hearing protection available? Well, have you ever heard of concussion (or concussive) hearing loss? There is no amount of anything you can put in or over your ears to protect you from concussion loss.bulletin.accurateshooter.com
Once you get up into the .50BMG range you find out that a suppressor is nowhere near as effective at reducing recoil as an aggressive brake.
Prone shooting a suppressed bolt action .50BMG that has no brake can be a bit too brutal for many.
Before you try to argue that I'm wrong, go actually try prone shooting the same rifle with a standard suppressor on it and then with an aggressive brake like the AR50 has...
That's why Barrett went to the hybrid suppressor that has a small brake on the end of it, to keep it somewhat decent to shoot.
Probably similar depending on the weight.Never shot a suppressed .50, but shot a suppressed .375 cheytac (had a pistol suppressor on it that was rated for it), and that was the most miserable thing I've ever shot.
Probably similar depending on the weight.
I shot a pretty heavy AI AW50 that was suppressed at one of the MG shoot days.
Every time you pulled the trigger it was like a mule kicked you.
I'm not sure I saw anyone including the ROs willing to go more than about 4 shots.
My SHTF-50 recoils like a 12 ga shotgun. Just enough to let you know it's there, but not something that jars your teeth loose after every shot.
I agree with you, ear pro is not something to take lightly. My point is that no matter what ear pro you use, no matter how good, there is NOTHING you can do to stop concussive hearing loss (bone conduction) except to reduce the source volume. Obviously the severity depends on the environment - structures, walls, rate of fire, SBRs, 50s etc. I just wish more shooters were aware of the damage you can sustain even with good ear pro. The PRS crowd loves putting huge loud brakes on tiny 6mms. This is why I hate brakes and will never use one again.I do all sorts of loud shit, but with good hearing protection, it’s all good, I have noticed no issues with my brakes using my MSA muffs.
Just don’t be cheap on hearing protection.
Do you have a suppressor on the end of it or a big tank style brake?
It can stop things and poke holes in things that other rifles can’t.I don't doubt that. I guess my question would be "Why?" As in ... Why would anyone even want to own a 50-BMG? It's horrifically loud, generates shoulder-crippling recoil, the ammo is mind-melting expensive, and it serves no useful purpose for either hunting or competition. I get plenty of big-bore excitement from the 338-LM barrel on my Barrett MRAD, with way less of the aggravation and expense. I'm just sayin' ...
I agree with you, ear pro is not something to take lightly. My point is that no matter what ear pro you use, no matter how good, there is NOTHING you can do to stop concussive hearing loss (bone conduction) except to reduce the source volume. Obviously the severity depends on the environment - structures, walls, rate of fire, SBRs, 50s etc. I just wish more shooters were aware of the damage you can sustain even with good ear pro. The PRS crowd loves putting huge loud brakes on tiny 6mms. This is why I hate brakes and will never use one again.
WHAT? :lol: Machinist for 29 years (nothing like out of the blue chatter to put the hurting on the ears foamies or not!) plus shooting = ringing all the time. Hell I've notice these days that when I'm stalking fluff rats that certain song bird calls eleicit a throbbing sensation in my right ear. Not pleasant and I need a white noise machine to sleep at night. Quiets the crickets in my head...It only takes once to do damage. I had a loud noise event (shot a critter sitting just behind some brush) where the blast was partially reflected by the brush. Definite tinnitus from it. Went to my audiologist and she advised me that they can treat that damage IF it is addressed inside of 6-8 weeks of the event. Treatment: oral steroid initially. If it responds even a litttle, they follow with steroid injections in the inner ear. I recovered 50% of the measured loss against my baseline.
I am running an Armalite AR50 brake on my rifle. Very effective brake for managing recoil! If you are directly behind the rifle it isn't so bad. If you are off to the side it is pretty brutal.I have an Armalite 50 (with a huge ass brake) and the recoil is less than that some of my WWII rifles and my FTR rifle. That said, the muzzle blast is brutal and why I wear ski goggles and double up on plugs and muffs. If I do that, no problem.
Looks like Marks Shark Brake.
First day I shot my 50 was at Tac Pro with the Dallas Tribe from Biggerhammer. I put 80 rounds through that rifle shooting Talon remanufactured .50 ball. I had to clean and loctite the turrets, clean and loctite the rings twice (didn't get the grease off them the first time so it didn't hold, and the rings weren't the greatest at that time, I have since upgraded). But, 80 rounds in a go was a lot, especially with that first muzzle brake that wasn't very effective.Probably similar depending on the weight.
I shot a pretty heavy AI AW50 that was suppressed at one of the MG shoot days.
Every time you pulled the trigger it was like a mule kicked you.
I'm not sure I saw anyone including the ROs willing to go more than about 4 shots.
Army did some studies to measure TBI. But I think it focused more on IED's and larger weapons like the Carl G 84mm recoilless.Did a anyone ever make a study, or just log any of this force, be interesting to see the difference and compare to something known to cause damage.
I had a .50 benchrest rifle built on a McBros action and even at 49 pounds the brake gave me a headache on its own. Recoil can cause concussions too. I shot my lightweight .500 a-square multiple times in rapid succession (10 lbs with scope) on an elk hunt, and was diagnosed with a concussion afterward. After my Army TBI’s, I’m going 100% suppressed. That said, do you guys know where a .375 CheyTac falls in that spectrum of recoil and blast? I want to replace the capability I sold with my .50. But, I also want to be there for my kids and need to avoid more TBI’s.
I agree ... 300-NM is terrific for LR and ELR shooting ... 1-mile (plus) hits shouldn't be a problem with the right ballistics. Probably not recommended unless you do precision reloading. Factory ammo is expensive, and likely won't give you the results you're looking for.How far do you wan to shoot?
That's the question.
For most folks .300NM is the perfect sweet spot between accuracy at a decent distance and recoil.
They make .50 BMG rated suppressors that you could use on a .375 CT if I am correct if that is the route you are looking at going.I had a .50 benchrest rifle built on a McBros action and even at 49 pounds the brake gave me a headache on its own. Recoil can cause concussions too. I shot my lightweight .500 a-square multiple times in rapid succession (10 lbs with scope) on an elk hunt, and was diagnosed with a concussion afterward. After my Army TBI’s, I’m going 100% suppressed. That said, do you guys know where a .375 CheyTac falls in that spectrum of recoil and blast? I want to replace the capability I sold with my .50. But, I also want to be there for my kids and need to avoid more TBI’s.
recoil on those can still be stout.They make .50 BMG rated suppressors that you could use on a .375 CT if I am correct if that is the route you are looking at going.
Recoil can be stout but the muzzle blast is the threat you are concerned about if I am correct. There is another thread around here, in that thread a Soldier that tested the dangers of muzzle blast wrote about it.
I might have misread it but I don't think I did.
Agree 100%. We have a .50BMG (Tac 50) at work and shooting that thing with the suppressor is not pleasant, especially prone. Much more manageable with the brake but that also has it's drawbacks.Once you get up into the .50BMG range you find out that a suppressor is nowhere near as effective at reducing recoil as an aggressive brake.
Prone shooting a suppressed bolt action .50BMG that has no brake can be a bit too brutal for many.
Before you try to argue that I'm wrong, go actually try prone shooting the same rifle with a standard suppressor on it and then with an aggressive brake like the AR50 has...
That's why Barrett went to the hybrid suppressor that has a small brake on the end of it, to keep it somewhat decent to shoot.
Army did some studies to measure TBI. But I think it focused more on IED's and larger weapons like the Carl G 84mm recoilless.
Are you fucking serious? Ever heard of ear plugs and muffs?I can't fathom why people choose to use a device on their rifle that causes irreparable permanent damage to their hearing?!
Never invite the man into your lifeA suppressor is a much better solution.
You can still get permanent damage and possibly even TBI while using a brake with ear pro. And I hate to break it to you but the man already has all the info you give over druing the background check. The real crime is that suppressors should be viewed as an accessory just like a brake or any other bolt on part.Are you fucking serious? Ever heard of ear plugs and muffs?
Never invite the man into your life
Are you fucking serious? Ever heard of ear plugs and muffs?
I had a .375 allen magnum that weighed in at 19lbs that could push a 350smk to 3300fps and suppressed it was absolutely unbearable to shoot more than 8 rounds. It was pushing 144grains of RE33. The recoil with brake was fine but super loud/concussive. Suppressor made it much better but recoil became unbearable. Honestly I think the limit suppressed is 338 lapua.
A 50 lb rifle is a bench gun, this is "snipershide"This is why folks shoot 50 pound+ rifles...
What kind of plugs and muffs were you using?I was shooting a braked 6mm, 300 WM, and a 338 LMAI today. I wore plugs and muffs, and there is still a ringing in my ears. Not sure about how loud the TV volume on the baseball game., as the Mrs. is at a group dinner tonight. Is triple hearing protection an option?
The cylinder shaped foam ones requires a lot of care to fully insert and make sure they stay seated. I personally prefer the tapered ones like the MAX for disposables.I was using Winchester folding muffs and HDX plugs from Home Depot.
I have a set of Howard Leights with aftermarket gel cups but they aren't in my range box currently. (MIA)
![]()
HDX Disposable Earplugs NRR 32 (50-Pack) REP501 - The Home Depot
Soft and easy to roll for positive insertion and removal. Disposable, soft polyurethane foam, 100% PVC free. Contoured, high-rebound foam for a more secure fit. Sound absorption level: 32dB NRR.www.homedepot.com