-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
So apparently the German server thing is real. LOL someone explain how that went down
- Thread starter TheGerman
- Start date
Is Sidney Powell Married? Details About Husband Age & Wikipedia
Learn about Attorney Sidney Powell Twitter Feed, Wikipedia, Age, Husband, Net Worth. Sidney Powell, former federal prosecutor and current attorney of Michael T. Flynn, 10 facts.
celebpie.com
I find Sidney Powell an interesting person as she is allegedly General Michael T. Flynn's attorney. She also wants a security clearance.
She did represent Flynn during his case. Nothing "alleged" about that at all.Is Sidney Powell Married? Details About Husband Age & Wikipedia
Learn about Attorney Sidney Powell Twitter Feed, Wikipedia, Age, Husband, Net Worth. Sidney Powell, former federal prosecutor and current attorney of Michael T. Flynn, 10 facts.
I find Sidney Powell an interesting person as she is allegedly General Michael T. Flynn's attorney. She also wants a security clearance.
Here's a whole write up of all of the various conspiracy topics that this thread is about:
It throws additional claims into the mix.
CIA Director Suspected Wounded After US Military Raid On Secret German Election Base
Sorcha Faal, Whatdoesitmean.com
www.whatdoesitmean.com
It throws additional claims into the mix.
if the cia is running wild and not under the control of the president, that needs to come to the forefront of the american people’s attention. it is a more serious threat that russia and china combined.
and fyi....that’s rhetorical, not a question.
and fyi....that’s rhetorical, not a question.
I just heard today that a high level CIA officer was wounded at the safe house in the raid. But I also read a tweet very close to Nov4th that Gina Haspel went to see Mitch McConnel in his office. Last I've heard of her and it may not be accurate.
Have you ever stopped to think about how or why we regularly see news stories on how bad the alphabet agencies have screwed up this or that, etc, etc... but rarely, if ever, hear of stories alleging CIA misconduct? Notice all we hear about CIA stuff is "hero stories" where they saved the day, or were otherwise doing great patriotic things and died for the nation?
Sip on that for a minute....
This documentary *used to be* on YouTube and was demonetized within a week of it being posted.... and was removed at some point...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/l8nuHIlmugbY/
There's some things in that video that, to me, are kinda far out there and meh... but other stuff that could absolutely send a chill down your spine... sit back with some popcorn, or a drinkie, and buckle up...
Then we have the Wikileaks/Snowden dump that says the CIA can make it look like hacking came from other countries..... hmmm...
Last edited:
Consider that we already know FBI is corrupt. We should know the CIA, NSA and others are corrupt. This coup just did not start yesterday.
"The intelligence community has six ways from Sunday ......."
"The intelligence community has six ways from Sunday ......."
read my last sentence in that post, homie. lmk if i need to spell that out for you further.
if these guys killed 5 soldiers, it’s time to list the names and addresses of the enemies of the american people, and unleash the public on them. their only option will be to flee the country. and i’d not be above using the full force of the american military to route these motherfuckers out.
do them like they did the iraqi government leaders...put them on posters with rewards for them-dead or alive.
What you think someone "should" do and what will happen may not coincide. US military has been compromised by the Communists as well.
We are in an unstable situation; cold war scenario. Not sure what happens now.
That's exactly what Myronman is saying, by pointing out they have instutional knowledge of how to CYA.
If a retired Airforce Maj from the “Gulf War” says it, it must have happened. 
Add him to the 80 something year old retired General from Vietnam. These retired boys sure do have some sweet connections.
Everyone is quoting everyone else as proof something happened. And yet, still no proof.
Add him to the 80 something year old retired General from Vietnam. These retired boys sure do have some sweet connections.
Everyone is quoting everyone else as proof something happened. And yet, still no proof.
If a retired Airforce Maj from the “Gulf War” says it, it must have happened.
Add him to the 80 something year old retired General from Vietnam. These retired boys sure do have some sweet connections.
Everyone is quoting everyone else as proof something happened. And yet, still no proof.
You go ahead and turn on Faux news, they will tell you what you are allowed to think, without you having to do any work of your own.
I haven’t watched the news for I don’t know how long. I’m just not old enough to believe everything I read on the internet. Nothing that is being posted is doing “work on your own”. You are all reading the opinions of other people, just like you, posted on twitter and every other social media outlet. Its the same as some dipshit from another forum quoting LBC from this forum, and saying something happened because he said it. Doesn’t make it true.
I’m completely blown away by the lack of objectiveness and logical reasoning from many on this shit. Everything that gets posted, I’ve been looking into. More than half is complete bullshit. Y’all got super stupid when you started saying the dudes who died in Sinai were SOF cats killed in the raid.
I want the same thing you all do, but I can’t sit here and watch a bunch of men I respect, run down a conspiracy holes that are bullshit.
so maybe we stick to shit that is actually real, like statistical issues with the voting. Like people actually cheating.
I’ve seen this same hype, song and dance with Q shit since the beginning of Q. Some Q shit is legit, and some isn’t. You have to be smart and discern shit. You can’t go with every theory some dude with a website puts out.
And before I’m called a shill, I’ve been on this site since 2005, in the Military since 1999, and have never voted Democrat. The best commie is a dead one, so eat a dick with you lame ass straw man attacks.
Last edited:
Like you, I have long since dismissed the vast majority of this tin foil hat stuff. In my humble opinion, informing us here you have access to S, TS, TS-SCI personnel databases isn't the best way to establish credibility because, if true, thats an avenue of exploitation for people way smarter than me to find your IP address etc, etc, etc, etc.
I could also just be a "dumb fuck."
Yup, it’s actually a Q level clearance. I AM Q! Maybe I’m retired and my sources told me. Maybe I’m bragging to make you like me. Maybe I’m drunk. Maybe, if you knew a little more than you do, you could find it open source.
I'll get my Q one of these days once I'm done pulling my current shenanigans
.Be safe.
I deleted my post because I was speaking out of anger and said more than I should have. I was speaking from a point of anger, and not from a point of wisdom. I let it cloud my judgement, and I’m not afraid to say that. Recognizing when I fuck up is something I’ve had to work hard at.
I’ll leave it at this. Everything you all read on here, Twitter, or some random source, you need to take with a grain of salt. Research it. Look for other sources that independently confirm their assertions with evidence. If they use other opinions, to validate their opinion as fact, it’s garbage info. If they heard something from their un-named contacts, it’s probably shit.
A lot of people on Twitter and with independent sites gain revenue from clicks. They act like they are in the know, so they get traffic. Just like news papers today using salacious headlines for traffic, others are are doing the same.
Also, false information is put out so that it can be used to discredit you later. You have to be cautious.
What intel is being fed to you for the purpose of getting you to do or think the way your enemy wants you to? This is a question you need to be asking yourself all of the time.
I’m out.
I’ll leave it at this. Everything you all read on here, Twitter, or some random source, you need to take with a grain of salt. Research it. Look for other sources that independently confirm their assertions with evidence. If they use other opinions, to validate their opinion as fact, it’s garbage info. If they heard something from their un-named contacts, it’s probably shit.
A lot of people on Twitter and with independent sites gain revenue from clicks. They act like they are in the know, so they get traffic. Just like news papers today using salacious headlines for traffic, others are are doing the same.
Also, false information is put out so that it can be used to discredit you later. You have to be cautious.
What intel is being fed to you for the purpose of getting you to do or think the way your enemy wants you to? This is a question you need to be asking yourself all of the time.
I’m out.
Expert testimony today the voting machines were communicating with a server in Frankfurt....pieces getting confirmed one by one.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Arizona Voter Fraud Witness Army Col. Phil Waldron Confirms Experts Saw Dominion Communicating with Frankfurt on Election Day (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Rudy Giuliani’s first witness at the Arizona hearing on Monday was information warfare officer Retired Army Colonel Phil Waldron.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Anybody got a bio on a "retired" Colonel Phil Waldron?
Is he presently working as a government contractor?
What is the source of his information?
Doubt it's him but both of them did "30 years"!
Is he presently working as a government contractor?
What is the source of his information?
Doubt it's him but both of them did "30 years"!
did you see the sidebar story about the cia agent killed in somalia?
he was supposedly on the team that took out "bin laden".
If the FBI is the new KGB, then the CIA is the GRU for globalist bankers. Remember, the same international socialism which was funded by international money houses did not disappear when the USSR was judged unworthy and torn down by it's backers. It was simply placed under new management under the auspice of the New World Order.
Confirmation bias can detract from logical reasoning and deduction skills. We want it to be true therefore it must be true.I haven’t watched the news for I don’t know how long. I’m just not old enough to believe everything I read on the internet. Nothing that is being posted is doing “work on your own”. You are all reading the opinions of other people, just like you, posted on twitter and every other social media outlet. Its the same as some dipshit from another forum quoting LBC from this forum, and saying something happened because he said it. Doesn’t make it true.
I’m completely blown away by the lack of objectiveness and logical reasoning from many on this shit. Everything that gets posted, I’ve been looking into. More than half is complete bullshit. Y’all got super stupid when you started saying the dudes who died in Sinai were SOF cats killed in the raid.
I want the same thing you all do, but I can’t sit here and watch a bunch of men I respect, run down a conspiracy holes that are bullshit.
so maybe we stick to shit that is actually real, like statistical issues with the voting. Like people actually cheating.
I’ve seen this same hype, song and dance with Q shit since the beginning of Q. Some Q shit is legit, and some isn’t. You have to be smart and discern shit. You can’t go with every theory some dude with a website puts out.
And before I’m called a shill, I’ve been on this site since 2005, in the Military since 1999, and have never voted Democrat. The best commie is a dead one, so eat a dick with you lame ass straw man attacks.
I have a hard time believing a raid was conducted in Germany and 5 SF soldiers died. Also, if this were true, how could we fault the individuals protecting the compound? I doubt they were given warning. If they were given warning or knew they were U.S. forces then they need to be thrown in prison.
Thrown in prison?
For doing their job and getting raided?
What if
you were at your 2nd job at the Quik Stop, or at home and an armed crew blew into your living room.
Instead of trying to take your computer (which might be the reason they showed up) they try to take your guns?
BTW,
if the Army lost 5 in the raid, but still walked out with the server data, how big was the strike force
(just asking for a friend)
For doing their job and getting raided?
What if
you were at your 2nd job at the Quik Stop, or at home and an armed crew blew into your living room.Instead of trying to take your computer (which might be the reason they showed up) they try to take your guns?
BTW,
if the Army lost 5 in the raid, but still walked out with the server data, how big was the strike force
(just asking for a friend)
Yeah I'm not buying any of it LOL. This server thing is shaky at best, no one knows if it is even real. Turning it into a Jack Ryan mission is really pretty silly. I don't know why people fall into the Alex Jones crazy trap so easily.
Because fiction is now disguised as news. Most of these people didn’t grow up with the internet. They have a hard time navigating through the massive amount of data coming their way. They think the website that some trailer park dude made to look all professional, is fucking Walter Cronkite putting out the news. Also, they want to belong to a team. LBC and others keep posting everything their twitter algorithms pull up. Then they get praise by guys who don’t even understand what twitter is, as if they are doing a great service to the country with all of their hard work and in the know contacts.
Anyone who questions any of it is attacked as a commie, pedo, or socialist. So the feeble are scared to even doubt it, because they want to belong.
It’s a hive minded echo chamber.
edited to add: there is a lot of good information being posted as well. It’s just being discredited in the same sentence with all of the bad shit. Also, the media is completely corrupted. Probably has been forever, we just didn’t have other avenues to gain information, so we never knew it. This leads people to search for alternative sources of information. Some chose well, and other chose no name websites that just regurgitate reworded opinion as news.
Last edited:
It's amusing how quickly we believe politicians and lawyers when they tell us what we want to hear.
Well said, spot on. Honestly my patience for the daily shark jumps is wearing thin. I don't play well in echo chambers and this is looking more like a big LARP fest daily.
It's odd that the whole premise of this theory starts with the belief that Dominion voting machines somehow changed votes. The whole "tabulation server in Germany" thing is ancillary to that belief. It's even more odd that the theory lives on, even after a hand re-count of paper ballots verified the tabulations of the voting machines ... irrespective of server locations. I'm just sayin' ... if any machine changed votes in any material way, wouldn't it have shown in the paper-ballot hand-recount? If it didn't, then why should anybody care if the tabulation server was in Germany, or Rwanda, or the Land of Oz?
The only thing I can think of is that there would be a bunch of ballots, in sequential order, that all went to Biden (because they were electronically submitted/ingested at the same time). Electronic and printed ballots should exist, and match, and have a time stamp of entry and location. The statistical likelihood (like Detroit, MI) of several hundred (never mind thousands) all going to one candidate would definitely raise the issue of voter fraud. But again, it isn't actual proof, only an indication of it.
@rustyinbend & @MarinePMI - I'm curious as to why neither of you mentioned the necessity to signature verify, or the affidavits/testimony by citizen witnesses?
Why would anyone think repeated counts of the same illegitimate ballots yield a different result?
Why would anyone think repeated counts of the same illegitimate ballots yield a different result?
I guess because where I'm at, it isn't required (don't get me started). And forged signatures are only as good (or bad) as the s/w being used to flag them...
No, please, do start. I'd like to hear your reasoning behind why it isn't (shouldn't?) be required.
funny how the press say no foreign connections when china bought $400 million of dominion in october.
That's why it is also highly suspicious when swing states turned in democratic candidate votes way above the norm of any other state (like 30% in some states), even including the Democratic strongholds (like NY and CA). The percentages in Detroit scream fraud, but there's no way to prove it. And that, right there, is the gist of this. Everyone knows there was fraud. Everyone knows how close the election was. And everyone knows there's no way to prove it. Therefore, there's a lot of people that have just lost faith in the election system.
Trump voters turned out with 11% MORE votes than in his 2016 election. That is a US record for any sitting President. And here we have a Dem candidate that didn't campaign, didn't hold pressers, and was behind at midnight of election night...and he suddenly won. I'm not thinking so, nor are a lot of people.
Biden may be inaugurated, but if so, his Presidency will live under a cloud of suspicion and doubt.
IMO, they should be required. Traditional/Absentee (requested) mail in ballots being the exception, everyone should have to show ID and a thumbprint when they drop off their ballot/or vote. That identity is then struck off the voter list, and locks out anyone else from voting under that name. If a second vote is attempted, both ballots get flagged (timestamp and polling location) and thumbprints are scanned against known records. The real person's vote get counted. The fraudulent voter has a warrant issued for their arrest (based on the fingerprint submitted with the fraudulent ballot).
If people knew that they would be arrested, immediately, with proof already on hand...voter fraud would essentially cease to exist for the in person voter/ballot dropper offer.
In my state, the signature is validated after filling out an application to vote (in-person) or upon receipt of the envelope (mail-in/remote voting). The ballot number is recorded with the signature, but then ballot is separated from this number prior to scanning to preserve anonymity. After this point, it would be impossible to link a particular ballot to a particular voter, so disqualifying a ballot and removing a vote based upon some sort of signature match is impossible.
Similar threads
