Re: SWFA Super Sniper 5-20X50HD
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Boomstick308</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Are other FFP reticles normally thicker than this one? seems like people are always saying that FFP is not going to be good for target shooting since its too thick. But at .05 mil its only covering .18 inches at 100 yds... that doesnt seem unreasonable to me. </div></div>
Quite a few are thicker. Some are thinner. I feel this thickness is a pretty good compromise that fits the power range of the scope very well. While some like the looks of thinner reticles better, you're right--it's hard to think of anything in which the thickness of this reticle would cause any real problems.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Boomstick308</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Are other FFP reticles normally thicker than this one? seems like people are always saying that FFP is not going to be good for target shooting since its too thick. But at .05 mil its only covering .18 inches at 100 yds... that doesnt seem unreasonable to me. </div></div>
Quite a few are thicker. Some are thinner. I feel this thickness is a pretty good compromise that fits the power range of the scope very well. While some like the looks of thinner reticles better, you're right--it's hard to think of anything in which the thickness of this reticle would cause any real problems.