My 6-24 get 30 mil. I will double check again today. If I am wrong I will correct.I assume he is simply spinning from full down to full up so mount isn’t a factor in recording total elevation adjustment available.
Thanks @randalloc
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My 6-24 get 30 mil. I will double check again today. If I am wrong I will correct.I assume he is simply spinning from full down to full up so mount isn’t a factor in recording total elevation adjustment available.
Thanks @randalloc
yes.. the rail you pick will determine your realityMy 6-24 get 30 mil. I will double check again today. If I am wrong I will correct.
Nope. I am talking about the bottom down all the way to top up all the way range. It is not on a rail.yes.. the rail you pick will determine your reality
Frank, what distance in the above?Here is a short piece so you can see,
Thanks. Now that you’ve spent a good amount of time with it, how would you describe it in the sense of where it falls in relation to some of the optics it has been compared to in these threads?In the beginning the big square is 600, the IPSC behind it is 800 and the red circles are 6” at 500
The target I shoot is. 400 yards and a 66% IPSC
The reticle has a great focus the targets are a bit soft - that is in the TRIGGERCAM it has a manual focus I just settled on a better reticle focus.
Guessing the reticle view in the vid looks to be a 6-24 model EP4 and around 16x magnification... that bout right Frank? Thx gives a good sense of it.Here is a short piece so you can see,
The text in the vid says it is the 4-16xGuessing the reticle view in the vid looks to be a 6-24 model EP4 and around 16x magnification... that bout right Frank? Thx gives a good sense of it.
I noticed at the beginning of the video that the dots in the center of the reticle disappeared against the darker target. Did it do this to your eye like the camera recorded?4-16x model on 16x
it’s a very good scope, it’s not perfect, but it definitely punches above it’s weigh class. It can hold it’s own in any conversation with the $1500 scopes out there.
its been very repeatable, it looks good, and the controls are nice. So not even considering the price, it’s a good scope
Mine did the same on the magnification ring. I loosened the set screw and set it to a reasonable torque. Worked fine after that.
Turrets example of Arken SH4 and EP4 lines..Yes I’d be happy to
The original first out of the gate rings are med height and work ideal on a full picatinny rail. They now have one the website low and high rings as well and the lows would work better for your Tikka setup. to get it down. Details on the website. https://arkenopticsusa.com?ref=531&-FFP-ZeroStopMy 4-16 has performed flawlessly. Elev, Win, Par and Mag are all right on the money. ONLY complaint I could have (if it's even a complaint) is their rings are a bit high. I'm still running a 0-MOA rail on my Tikka (for now), but even a 20 or 30-MOA rail won't bring it that close to the barrel. As far as fit and finish, the rings are solid yet light.
My 4-16 turrets are super loud. In my opinion, these scopes would be worthless for me for hunting. I guess the loud turrets can be a problem, but the thin reticle and no illumination, with the heavy weight would lead me to believe I would would be settling with this scope instead of buying one much better suited.Is it just me or is anyone else bothered by the sound of the turrets? First off I do a lot of hunting most of it at range on coyotes. And for a turret to be so dang loud that it sounds like a freight train rolling in is deal breaker for me.
Why not hold over instead of dial? Especially if its only one shot.Is it just me or is anyone else bothered by the sound of the turrets? First off I do a lot of hunting most of it at range on coyotes. And for a turret to be so dang loud that it sounds like a freight train rolling in is deal breaker for me.
I have used several sets of their rings and mounts and never had an issue, I really like them. If you get in contact with them they will take care of you.I have no experience with Arken scopes. I did, however, take a chance on their rings...I should have known better.
First off, I ordered 1x 34mm Halo rings and 2x one-piece mounts. I only received the Halo rings and 1x one-piece mount. Secondly, when mounting the Halo ring-clamp to rail per torque spec (45 in/lb), only one ring would clamp tight, the other would rattle vertically when pushed with one finger.
Needless to say, I did not bother to try out the one-piece mount. I understand that all manufacturers will churn out a lemon every now and then. However, the first impression test failed miserably and there are too many other options out there to keep trying. So much for something that is advertised as "ZERO tolerances for errors."
There are a lot of guys who dial elevation and hold wind out there. I have even seen a few who dial both. It's just personal preference. Either way a guy shouldn't need earplugs just to dial the turrets.Who dials when hunting? I can see folks out west maybe making shots that long but with a 10 mil reticle it seems crazy to waste time spinning turrets.
It's just you!Is it just me or is anyone else bothered by the sound of the turrets? First off I do a lot of hunting most of it at range on coyotes. And for a turret to be so dang loud that it sounds like a freight train rolling in is deal breaker for me.
I have used several sets of their rings and mounts and never had an issue, I really like them. If you get in contact with them they will take care of you.
How well does your red tab BC 17 eye cap working out for your.. we also recommend the Multi-flex 16,17,18 as the eye peice is slightly tapered.. I got one of these you got on order and want to see how they compare to each other.Looks like MK Machining already makes a throw lever and parallax knob for the EP4. Here's a link. And if anyone is wondering, here's the Butler Creek caps that fit the EP4 series. https://mkmachining.com/product/arken-throw-levers/
View attachment 7212841View attachment 7212843
How well does your red tab BC 17 eye cap working out for your.. we also recommend the Multi-flex 16,17,18 as the eye peice is slightly tapered.. I got one of these you got on order and want to see how they compare to each other.
Yes, I wanted one account that was Arken only related to answer those issues and recently created the Arken one... my personal account is for more general posting, not Arken related when I do... in the past I used it and will not in the future for Arken posts.Hi,
So comparing the words, phrasing and type text....
@Arken Optics USA Dealer are you the same as @randalloc ??
Arken Optics really needs to look at sending cease and desist to some of its "dealers" in order to recover their business reputation from the SPAM feel it has going on.
Sincerely,
Theis
It fits great! The objective cap was a huge bitch to get stretched on, but it's solid as well.How well does your red tab BC 17 eye cap working out for your.. we also recommend the Multi-flex 16,17,18 as the eye peice is slightly tapered.. I got one of these you got on order and want to see how they compare to each other.
So has any dealers been having issues with Arken sales and customers service not responding to emails, phone calls , and texts ??? I haven't heard back from them .
I have no experience with Arken scopes. I did, however, take a chance on their rings...I should have known better.
First off, I ordered 1x 34mm Halo rings and 2x one-piece mounts. I only received the Halo rings and 1x one-piece mount. Secondly, when mounting the Halo ring-clamp to rail per torque spec (45 in/lb), only one ring would clamp tight, the other would rattle vertically when pushed with one finger.
Needless to say, I did not bother to try out the one-piece mount. I understand that all manufacturers will churn out a lemon every now and then. However, the first impression test failed miserably and there are too many other options out there to keep trying. So much for something that is advertised as "ZERO tolerances for errors."
Might be Shot show backlog.