What's custom about it?$1624 is a compelling price for a complete custom rifle, so they'll certainly sell a few.
The big question is, will they shoot?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's custom about it?$1624 is a compelling price for a complete custom rifle, so they'll certainly sell a few.
The big question is, will they shoot?
The action is smooooth. No binding. Can run with one finger.
I'm not the biggest barrel nut fan but I do have one on a nuke, mainly to try a 22 creed barrel out without dropping 700 into a shouldered barrel. Yeah, aesthetically speaking it's ugly, but it hammers and after it's burnt out at 1k rds I'll do something different. It defines allowed me to try out cartridge, figure twist rate, and experiment with 22creed without being bartlien blank+gunsmith fees into it.But it has a barrel nut.....
It was a jokeI'm not the biggest barrel nut fan but I do have one on a nuke, mainly to try a 22 creed barrel out without dropping 700 into a shouldered barrel. Yeah, aesthetically speaking it's ugly, but it hammers and after it's burnt out at 1k rds I'll do something different. It defines allowed me to try out cartridge, figure twist rate, and experiment with 22creed without being bartlien blank+gunsmith fees into it.
Gotcha, some guys rag on them, so I didn't know. I'll recalibrate sarcasm meter.It was a joke
some guys rag on them
The 6.5 PRC is not similar to the 6.5 Creed. The 6.5 PRC is much closer related to the .270 WSM and 6.8 Western, than the 6.5 CM. The 6.5 Creed is more closely related to the .260 Rem, 7mm-08, and .308 Win. in the case capacity, size, parent case, and types of powder used.I think it’s all about what you’re familiar with.
I am familiar with the 270 WSM sort of .. hence. The 6.8 W… just like 6.5 PRC is to 6.5 cm.
Best groups of the day... If you pulled the fliers from the groups, then they would be sub-1/2 MOA.![]()
Mostly on the first shot. Shot #1 when I measure my groups is not always the true first shot of the group, it’s just the closest to the bull, since you start marking shots directly after marking POA…It’s just the first shot hole that you see, gets the “1” marker.Is it always on the first shot? Those groups look similar to mine with 168 CC’s; I was using IMR4064. They also look like my test groups with a 140RDF in my 6.5 CM. It’s maddening. At least I know my 6.5 will produce 1/2 MOA or less with a 123 CC; I’ve just begun experimenting with the 308, it’s a Solus with a 20” PVA “Wilson” barrel. It seems to like 155 CC’s better so far. I’ll be trying 175’s in it too.
I'd be interested in that mag bolt face! It sucked that it didn't work out as expected, but I'm really liking this action. That's coming from someone that's owned origin, tl3, deadlines, impacts, defiance, AI, and badger 2013s. My origin sa that I tried to use 6.5prc with would trap empty brass during ejection between upper rear port corner and top rd in mag, no matter how hard you cycled bolt. Zermatts solution was bend feed lips down to lower top rd in mag, nevermind there was barely any overlap between top rd and bolt face to feed.I was frustrated because I was using factory 6.5 PRC rounds. I got a new bolt face and barrel, it's a .308 now.
I've generally had good luck with the nosler CC bullets, but I've saw sometimes a bullet/barrel combo cause a flier like that. Best case I can think was an old Lothar walthar savage barrel, during load work with 107smk, 105h-vld(pre hybrids), and 105amax the amax would be 2 in a hole and 1 1/2" away. I just chalked it upto bullet. I don't think it's a barrel stress issue, or flier would be consistent to main group. In 1 it's high, and the other it's to the left.Quick range session today yielded some less than stellar results... I think this factory barrel might just be shit... Because it always has a damn flier in EVERY group. Otherwise, the groups would be amazing.
View attachment 8442547
Best groups of the day... If you pulled the fliers from the groups, then they would be sub-1/2 MOA.
View attachment 8442548View attachment 8442549
I figured out the problem.I can extract and eject loaded 2.955" 7SAW from an Origin no problem
Proof Research prefit.where did you get the 308 barrel?
Well, that’s some good information about short action/ and magnums …I'd be interested in that mag bolt face! It sucked that it didn't work out as expected, but I'm really liking this action. That's coming from someone that's owned origin, tl3, deadlines, impacts, defiance, AI, and badger 2013s. My origin sa that I tried to use 6.5prc with would trap empty brass during ejection between upper rear port corner and top rd in mag, no matter how hard you cycled bolt. Zermatts solution was bend feed lips down to lower top rd in mag, nevermind there was barely any overlap between top rd and bolt face to feed.
I find the saami freebore of 6.5prc is a bit long to play nice on short actions. My Smith ordered a custom reamer that is no turn with adg brass and freebore is .155 or .160(saami is .188). Works better with long slippery bullets and also constraints of a SA.
where did you get the 308 barrel?
Because your new member you’re not able to do private messages? are you interested in selling the barrel in the bolt face?I was frustrated because I was using factory 6.5 PRC rounds. I got a new bolt face and barrel, it's a .308 now.
I’ll probably hold on to it. But if I change my mind I’ll let ya know.Because your new member you’re not able to do private messages? are you interested in selling the barrel in the bolt face?
Anybody knows how to do a private conversation let me know? Can’t seem to get it to work.
Well, that’s some good information about short action/ and magnums …
When I look at just hunting bullets in general, looking at what’s available, no matter what caliber most of the hunting bullets do not look like a burger, Vld. Hunting bullet.
Be interested to find out who has been using the short magnums in these solace actions?
44gr varget and 168gr smk was the street equivalent to fgmm. While that load always shot good, along with 43.7gr and 175smk, switching to h4895 got better numbers and accuracy.
Well, 44gr of Varget behind a 168 has always been my go-to load to see if any .308 Win would shoot, or not... This one did NOT like 44 grains, and is SUPER picky. Best groups were 45.0 and 45.2 grains. I'm probably going to snatch the barrel off and send it back to Aero, to see if they'll do some testing to find out WTF is wrong with it. Maybe tolerance stacking? Chamber seems to have been cut really nicely, and so is the crown, and the muzzle threads are also about as perfect as you could ask for, so I doubt any of that's the issue. And I'm seating bullets at a MAX of .030" off at a +/- 0.0005" tolerance, which should be more than short and consistent enough jump to eliminate seating depth as an issue. It has to be a bore issue. I'm going to scrub the shit out of the bore again before next range session and see if that helps settle it down. If it doesn't settle in the next 50 shots, then I'll be contacting Aero.44gr varget and 168gr smk was the street equivalent to fgmm. While that load always shot good, along with 43.7gr and 175smk, switching to h4895 got better numbers and accuracy.
Not enough difference between them and the Custom Comp to justify swapping over.Maybe try SMKs before calling the barrel bad?
I don't care what people agree with... I've never had issues with Custom Comps. I've tried 2 different types of bullets (RDF & Custom Comp) and 2 different weights, both are proven from that lot to be just fine in my other .30 caliber rifles... But this barrel won't shoot either one? I wouldn't say the bullets are the issue. But just to satisfy the masses, I might try a box of SMK's, or try some Berger 168's. I don't typically shoot Bergers at steel at the range (due to cost $$$) unless I'm doing load development on a particular hunting rifle/bullet combo, but I might have to give them a try just to see.I'm not sure many people would agree with you on that one.
you can't make a barrel like a bullet, just like you can't make a horse drink water. I've had plenty of bullets that worked in other barrels not work in a new barrel, but I tried another bullet and found one that worked great. I'm afraid you will need to do that or replace barrel and "hope" the new barrel likes custom comps. I will say, the biggest difference I saw between cc and smk was at distance the smk were just tighter.I don't care what people agree with... I've never had issues with Custom Comps. I've tried 2 different types of bullets (RDF & Custom Comp) and 2 different weights, both are proven from that lot to be just fine in my other .30 caliber rifles... But this barrel won't shoot either one? I wouldn't say the bullets are the issue. But just to satisfy the masses, I might try a box of SMK's, or try some Berger 168's. I don't typically shoot Bergers at steel at the range (due to cost $$$) unless I'm doing load development on a particular hunting rifle/bullet combo, but I might have to give them a try just to see.
Yeah, I’ve been doing this a long time…I’m aware. But when 10 barrels like them, and then 1 decides it doesn’t, that’s strange. Also, the fact it didn’t like 210 RDF’s or 168 Custom Comps is strange, being that it’s a 1:10 twist.you can't make a barrel like a bullet, just like you can't make a horse drink water. I've had plenty of bullets that worked in other barrels not work in a new barrel, but I tried another bullet and found one that worked great. I'm afraid you will need to do that or replace barrel and "hope" the new barrel likes custom comps. I will say, the biggest difference I saw between cc and smk was at distance the smk were just tighter.
No that's not strange at all. 20 to 1 or 50 to 1, yea it's the barrel.But when 10 barrels like them, and then 1 decides it doesn’t, that’s strange.
Exactly… When I said “that’s strange”, I was referring to being strange that this particular barrel does not like that bullet & charge, since I’ve never had (or loaded for) a .308 Win that didn’t like that bullet/powder combo. That has been my gold-standard for almost 20 years, and hasn’t failed me yet. Even guns that belonged to friends that said they couldn’t get it to group well, shot MOA or better with that combo.No that's not strange at all. 20 to 1 or 50 to 1, yea it's the barrel.
I meant the opposite. One barrel in ten thar doesn't like your pet load isn't unusual.Exactly… When I said “that’s strange”, I was referring to being strange that this particular barrel does not like that bullet & charge, since I’ve never had (or loaded for) a .308 Win that didn’t like that bullet/powder combo. That has been my gold-standard for almost 20 years, and hasn’t failed me yet. Even guns that belonged to friends that said they couldn’t get it to group well, shot MOA or better with that combo.
Also, the fact it didn’t like 210 RDF’s or 168 Custom Comps is strange, being that it’s a 1:10 twist.
Exactly… When I said “that’s strange”, I was referring to being strange that this particular barrel does not like that bullet & charge, since I’ve never had (or loaded for) a .308 Win that didn’t like that bullet/powder combo. That has been my gold-standard for almost 20 years, and hasn’t failed me yet. Even guns that belonged to friends that said they couldn’t get it to group well, shot MOA or better with that combo.
See, I haven't had that issue with the RDF's like some folks claim. Maybe I'm just lucky with them. The only gun that hasn't shot them well was the 16" MPR 6mmARC, with the Nosler 115 RDF's... But after sending that back to Christensen, it was a chamber issue + a tolerance stacking issue with the action, and the replacement has been great. All my magnums and .300 BLK precision loads using the 210 RDF's have been exceptional. Even my 16" MPR .308 Win will stack 5 of them inside a 1/2". But this barrel just seems to hate everything I've thrown at it. I've been through 2 complete rounds of 50 (4x25) load development with 2 different bullets + another 50 at 45.0gr, and one day it shoots a great group, the next it's like shit. I even tested another theory this weekend, where I shot 2 groups using the TBAC Magnus-S, and the OCL Hydrogen-L... Same powder, same everything, just to see if it was a harmonics issue. I didn't figure with a truck axle M24 contour barrel it would be, but... covering all my bases. It shot 1 semi-acceptable group out of 4. I shot a 5 shot group with the Magnus-S, then let it cool down, and shot a 5 shot with the Hydro-L. Then swapped them around again, and did the same while letting it cool between. Same shit.Not strange at all.
RDFs are shit.
There's a reason why they have the moniker "random damn flier"
Well, I really wasn't asking your opinion on the matter, either.I wouldn't really call shooting 2 different bullets "covering all your bases"
But he is rightWell, I really wasn't asking your opinion on the matter, either.![]()
Not strange at all.
RDFs are shit.
There's a reason why they have the moniker "random damn flier"