THREE-OH-HATE is back...

Geez, sandwarrior makes a harmless joke not aimed maliciously at any cartridge in particular and the 308 butt-hurt-brigade comes running to tear him a new one. This is just like a Savage thread now.

No. Anytime a 308 has success on the firing line, people have to swoop in to try and knock it here on "the hide". Just like in the recent thread when the older guy shot that record group with a Savage 308. "Luck"...."Do it again!"...It gets old. Real old. There is a reason why this forum is ridiculed in other forums. Also, nobody mentioned Savage until you came in.

Behind every "joke" there is a bit of seriousness.
 
No. Anytime a 308 has success on the firing line, people have to swoop in to try and knock it here on "the hide". Just like in the recent thread when the older guy shot that record group with a Savage 308. "Luck"...."Do it again!"...It gets old. Real old. There is a reason why this forum is ridiculed in other forums. Also, nobody mentioned Savage until you came in.

Behind every "joke" there is a bit of seriousness.
Please note that through the thread, I've shown what new bullets in .308 dia. can do. They just need to be massaged right and if possible a tighter twist can be used to shoot them. That puts them on a more level playing field with the 6's, 6.5's and 7mm's.

Do note also, that that is what D_tros is saying. He used better bullets that didn't require a tighter twist than 1-10". But, if he had the .308 can do even better. Many of us in the past have thought the .308 was done with. Not so when the right factors are applied. Thus why I showed Franks video shooting the Flat-Line bullets.

Yeah, there is a bit of seriousness. We are serious shooters after all. If Big Green (and the rest of the military and target shooting community is never going away from the .308, we might as well make it better. It's not just heavier rounds, it's better shaped bullets and tighter twists.

Everybody over getting butt hurt yet?:ROFLMAO:
 
I can remember when everybody was shooting the 308, 223, and 300WM. And that was with no brakes. Everybody shitting on the overbores because they burn out too quick. Now people waste all their time TALKING about reloading and shooting them. We know who they are. Never see a word from them about replacing barrels. Just ladder, OCW, glass, and blah blah blah. Asking where their gunsmith be up at.
 
Shit, I shoot a 6.5 X 284. Last time I needed a barrel I had two spun up so as to have a spare on hand. When the mounted barrel goes south I'll spin on the spare and order two more. Load development? Found a good load ten or fifteen years ago and haven't done any actual load development, just adjustment between different lots of powder/primers/bullets.

Just so you don't think I'm a 6.5 whore, I currently have five rifles chambered in .308 and do shoot .308 out to 1,000. I will say that the .308 does not hammer at 1,000 like the 6.5 X 284 though.
 
Ha I go away for couple days and the thread blows up. Good stuff tho.

I posted for couple reasons.
First, for all the old timers to come out and reminisce about when the 308/300/223 kicked all the names (check haha)

Two as Sand has been saying, to get better ballistically and lighter 30 cal bullets. I would love a 160 gr bullet with a BC in the .5+ range. If I had my choice, of the bullets ive shot in comps (not only PRS) I would choose the new 200.20x Berger or the 155's screamin fast (both illegal in the prs). Its insanely accurate and the recoil is almost negligible. Going 3k the wind is very similar to a dasher pushing the 115 at 2750.

Three to let people know the Tac Class in PRS isn't just some crappy sandbagger shooters never cracking the top 50. This year there have been 308 shooters in the top 20 nearly 10 times with one top 10/5...which I think is phenominal.

Four, going into the PRS finale at the end of the month, there are 7 of us tied with 300's. I love how, similar to NASCAR, the best finisher at that match will determine the season champion. Not going to lie, im not a top 5 or prob even top 20 shooter in the country (even though I have been ranked there and consistently place there) but I wont ever have a chance at the Open champion. I don't shoot enough matches and I just don't have the time to dedicate to the sport with a small family and a full time construction job. The Tac class offers me the opportunity. Yes I am further down the todem pole for the prize table with the ballistic crutch, but it sure is fun seeing peoples faces when they find out Im shooting a 308 and its just plain fun shooting.


...

Like you said earlier, though, finding a balance in weight vs. usable speed is the trick. I use a long barreled 7mm-08 with a 1-8" twist. Just like the .308, finding the tight twist was like finding a tree that a unicorn pissed on so you could scrape the bark. ...

Bullet stability is the key. Anything can get there accurately if you can keep the bullet stable through the transonic range. Obviously, how the barrels and bullets are made are the biggest factors. We need to change how they are done, so we can increase their capability.

I have a friend shooting 168's with a 8 or 9 twist (cant remember) and he mentions the incredible long range accuracy going to the faster twist. He has hit milk jugs at 1 mile which I think is insane. Maybe over stabilizing is a good thing...would be cool to see a bullet maker come up with a light bullet recommending faster twists...


Please note that through the thread, I've shown what new bullets in .308 dia. can do. They just need to be massaged right and if possible a tighter twist can be used to shoot them. That puts them on a more level playing field with the 6's, 6.5's and 7mm's.

Do note also, that that is what D_tros is saying. He used better bullets that didn't require a tighter twist than 1-10". But, if he had the .308 can do even better. Many of us in the past have thought the .308 was done with. Not so when the right factors are applied. Thus why I showed Franks video shooting the Flat-Line bullets.

Yeah, there is a bit of seriousness. We are serious shooters after all. If Big Green (and the rest of the military and target shooting community is never going away from the .308, we might as well make it better. It's not just heavier rounds, it's better shaped bullets and tighter twists.

Everybody over getting butt hurt yet?:ROFLMAO:

Def on a "more level playing field" but there is still ground to be made up. Berger Hybrids/Sierra Tipped bullets have come along way. Custom bullet makers have great ideas, but charge too much for us recreational shooters to really afford them. Cool to see the progress in the last couple years let alone the last 10.



I can remember when everybody was shooting the 308, 223, and 300WM. And that was with no brakes. Everybody shitting on the overbores because they burn out too quick. Now people waste all their time TALKING about reloading and shooting them. We know who they are. Never see a word from them about replacing barrels. Just ladder, OCW, glass, and blah blah blah. Asking where their gunsmith be up at.

I remember that as well...until you realize to be in the top 10 or even 20 you needed to be there with the hot rod calibers. My first flat rifle was a 260 (prob like most in 2008-2012) then it was 6x47 loaded hot. 2K rnds then toss is the regimine now. Was sacrilegious until someone mentioned the price of match fees and travel and motel for one match exceeds $1k so if you use a barrel for 4 matches and toss, its not that big of an expense...Crazy $$$ to try to be competitive. Then in 2014 ish people were doing the 6 CM (comp match) with long barrels and slow powder to save barrels...

All the while they could have invented a light high BC easy to load for 30 cal and saved all the heartburn! (not really but sounds fun to talk about ha)

haha I asked my wife if I could buy an old Chevelle or Nova...she said sure sell your rifles...I DONT EVEN LIKE CARS!! hahhahah stoopid shooting sports

Regards,
DT
 
D_Tros,

What're ya sayin? You found that tree that a unicorn pissed on?;):D:D

Added: What bullet was your friend using to get his .308 to a mile? It's doable, good speed and the right angle boat tail help. along with a long ogive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: D_TROS
I, in fact, really like the .308. The barrels practically last forever at factory pressures. And out to 700yds or so, they shoot neck and neck with a 6.5CM.
Except for wind, drop and energy.
 

Attachments

  • 308-vs-6-5-creedmoor-vs-6mm-creedmoor-vs-26-nosler1.png
    308-vs-6-5-creedmoor-vs-6mm-creedmoor-vs-26-nosler1.png
    180.8 KB · Views: 194
D_Tros,

What're ya sayin? You found that tree that a unicorn pissed on?;):D:D

Added: What bullet was your friend using to get his .308 to a mile? It's doable, good speed and the right angle boat tail help. along with a long ogive.


Im not tellin where the unicorn dust comes from...ha

And he is shooting the 168's. Berger I believe. BC = .264 G7 roughly a 530 g1


Except for wind, drop and energy.


Good point other than the 175 SMK being completely outdated and the point of many posters here. The 155 palmas have the same bc (504) with 20 grs less behind em and I can push em 3000.

700 yards

308
155 3000
ele - wind - en
4.2 - 1.3 - 1212

6BR
105 2920
ele - wind - en
4.2 - 1.1 - 888

Id call that as close to neck and neck as you could get...given with a hot load on both of them...and a lot more recoil on the 30-h8. Yes that .2 mils is a lot...but im giving up more than .2 mils to the guys shooting the 110 smk compared to my 105...which sucks even more!! lol

308
168 2800
ele - wind - en
4.8 - 1.3 - 1223

And yes recoil wears on a guy and its understandable to want to go smaller. I get bad migrains from a day of shooting from brakes. It sucks. Not even going into shooting off stoopid positions in 95%+ of the stages that PRS has gotten to and not getting a good read on the hit/miss due recoil for future adjustments IS a big deal...

Im def NOT saying if I shot open Id use a 308 by any means...but I am saying its noce that bullets are closing the gap between the slick little 6's and 6.5's.


Regards
DT
 
2600 fps with a 175gr out of what? A 12" barrel

See?? I can be snide as well :sneaky:
In reality 3000 is not hard to attain and if you were nervous, 2900 is under what 100% of Ftr/palma shooters are doing. Heck, I got up to 2900 with my 168's and didn't even have flat primers yet. 2 words - FB and OAL. Very few have experimented with both...
And to answer your question, 28" barrel. The trick is a long FB and my OAL is 2.95


But for science and to show BC trumps velocity, here some numbers any 22" 308 could attain, which is grossly under what most are running them at.

308
155 2800
ele - wind - en
5.0 - 1.5- 1004

Still hardly as bad as the graphic above portrays. And def not 25% hit ratio less...would love to see real number tho...people make the mistake of assuming because it sucks at 1000, it sucks everywhere. In reality, 90% of targets are 400-600. Wheelhouse baby. If you can handle the recoil.


Regrads,
DT
 
Im not tellin where the unicorn dust comes from...ha

And he is shooting the 168's. Berger I believe. BC = .264 G7 roughly a 530 g1





Good point other than the 175 SMK being completely outdated and the point of many posters here. The 155 palmas have the same bc (504) with 20 grs less behind em and I can push em 3000.

700 yards

308
155 3000
ele - wind - en
4.2 - 1.3 - 1212

6BR
105 2920
ele - wind - en
4.2 - 1.1 - 888

Id call that as close to neck and neck as you could get...given with a hot load on both of them...and a lot more recoil on the 30-h8. Yes that .2 mils is a lot...but im giving up more than .2 mils to the guys shooting the 110 smk compared to my 105...which sucks even more!! lol

308
168 2800
ele - wind - en
4.8 - 1.3 - 1223

And yes recoil wears on a guy and its understandable to want to go smaller. I get bad migrains from a day of shooting from brakes. It sucks. Not even going into shooting off stoopid positions in 95%+ of the stages that PRS has gotten to and not getting a good read on the hit/miss due recoil for future adjustments IS a big deal...

Im def NOT saying if I shot open Id use a 308 by any means...but I am saying its noce that bullets are closing the gap between the slick little 6's and 6.5's.


Regards
DT

That's exactly why I started testing the 155's in my 308 before I started building my new rifle. When it's what you've got, you can make up some ground on the 6's and 6.5's with good bullet selection.

3000 fps with a 155gr out of what? A 35" barrel

I was doing 2920 fps from a 24" barrel with Varget and 155 ELD-M's. Backed it down because I was seeing slight ejector shine on cheap Winchester brass. Still, I don't think 3000 or close to it is unattainable with a 26" barrel and a slightly slower powder.
 
Mature response....I expect nothing less when you are proven wrong. Based on your knowledge (or lack of) when it comes to precision rifles, I don't doubt anyone cares what you think about anything.
 
Mature response....I expect nothing less when you are proven wrong. Based on your knowledge (or lack of) when it comes to precision rifles, I don't doubt anyone cares what you think about anything.
Oh ya. You sure proved me wrong.
.308 are only useful at 100 feet. Just Don’t tell Dorgan how horrible they are.
 
308 is a solid round. I always have one around and I think it shines as a semi auto DMR.

Better/more popular calibers now? Absolutely.

If they handed me a 308 bolt or semi and said thats what you get, I wouldnt worry about it.
 
Who the fuck in here said they give a shit what Socom shoots or that they are hunting people?

...
Actually, I did. But, the point to my statement was if the military and civilian target shooters aren't giving up the .308, we might as well make it better.

Then again, that was the point the OP was making with this thread.

Added: I didn't know the Mk20/SCAR was still around. Most people I know who used it weren't that impressed. I've never used one though, only shot one once. I didn't find it to be better really than the AR-15 platform. The barrel could be changed pretty quick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: D_TROS and Bender
Actually, I did. But, the point to my statement was if the military and civilian target shooters aren't giving up the .308, we might as well make it better.

Then again, that was the point the OP was making with this thread.

Added: I didn't know the Mk20/SCAR was still around. Most people I know who used it weren't that impressed. I've never used one though, only shot one once. I didn't find it to be better really than the AR-15 platform. The barrel could be changed pretty quick.

Uh virtually all competitive shooters have given it up, socom went to 300norma and 6.5 creedmoor. big army and Marines have gone to 300 win mag and it's only a matter of time before they go 6.5 as well. It's more of a DODIC ammo issue than anything for both big greens.

Ranger Batts and army sf love the scar/mk20. You know the guys out there actually killing mother fuckers wholesale. Not sure who you are talking to, but not all opinions are equal or valid. The mk20 is a huge hit and the guys love it. Even more so when the 6.5 rollout comes.
 
Uh virtually all competitive shooters have given it up, socom went to 300norma and 6.5 creedmoor. big army and Marines have gone to 300 win mag and it's only a matter of time before they go 6.5 as well. It's more of a DODIC ammo issue than anything for both big greens.

Ranger Batts and army sf love the scar/mk20. You know the guys out there actually killing mother fuckers wholesale. Not sure who you are talking to, but not all opinions are equal or valid. The mk20 is a huge hit and the guys love it. Even more so when the 6.5 rollout comes.
Ex-Rangers who spent time in 1st Batt. Kind of a community of the now and us former Rangers.
 
YEYE BOYS!

Pretty cool trophies. Switch to 308! Everyone is doing it.


2018 JC STEEL PRS.jpg





And you friendly few on this thread will be privy to news. A scope manufacture that wont be named yet is releasing a new scope and they reached out to me to release/test it at the PRS finale. Hope to post some pics here, but if you are at the finale, look me up!!




Regards,
DT
 
I enjoy shooting my 308s, I have several barrels in that caliber. They work great since most of my shooting is 700 yards and less. Come one Bender, I love the comments of well that's what the military uses. It is such a great closing argument ?
 
It's funny about the .308 as even within "the brotherhood" people here have talked about being on the outside for using newer bullets. Palma guys insist on 155's or "you don't make the team" kind of thing. Cheating if you use "creative" bullets. The .308 diameter can accommodate these.

Even the 155's they use now are massaged to make them better! Why not use improved bullets?!? And, ballistics??!?

The strange thing to me is even within the ".308 community" you get a resistance to new ideas that's as big as the resistance to other calibers.

So, D_Tros, thanks for starting this thread, it's been an eye opener for all of us!
 
  • Like
Reactions: D_TROS and Bender
Actually the limit is 156 gn (hence the Berger 155.5 'Fullbore'), and the 'why' was back when they made that rule, that was the heaviest bullet any NATO country happened to use in issue three-oh-hate ammo. Obviously that was a *long* damn time ago... so why they never changed with the times? They stopped using 'issue' ammo years ago...

Trivia for ya... that extra tight bore you sometimes see in Palma 12 or 13 tw barrels, .298x.306, came about in part because the 'issue' ammo (British 'Radway Green', if I'm not mistaken) was notoriously sloppy (undersized). So rather than fix the problem (the $hitty bullets) since back then the requirement for issue ammo still existed, they just built the barrel around the damn bullets. Turned out a fortunate happenstance that it's a pretty good solution for 155s in general. Personally, I think it was part of the reason why heavier bullets took so long to get really dialed in, particularly in F/TR. Too much 'DNA' from HP Rifle, saying that you 'must use' a .298x.3065" bore... which pressures out really damn quick like with anything with a longer bearing surface, so you just couldn't get any of the 'heavies' or even 'cruiser' weight bullets going fast enough to compete with the 155s. Once that particular pair of shackles came off... things got interesting for a few years ;)
 
Gotta keep the 3-oh-H8 love going.

Recently shot the PRS finale and won Top Tac for the match and the SEASON and had one hell of a good time. Im glad the seasons over, but I am looking forward to next year to as well. Lots of tears were spilt when people find out they lost to a 3-oh-H8!! haha. The other Tac shooters made it one heck of a match. After day 1 I had 5 tac shooters in front of me. Day 2 I calmed my nerves and almost went clean. Missed 2 shots out of 90 (and timed out when I had a mag malfunction for another 2 pts dwn). Man I love the 3-oh-H8!


2018 PRS FINALE 2.jpg



This match I shot 168 gr Bergers using 43.8gr of N-140 jumping 015 and it shot super good. I would highly recommend VV powder. I use it in both my 6BR and theis 308 and my rifles have nvr shot so well. I was using factory HSM brass and was getting some horrible horizontal stringing. I chamfer inside/outside and boom one hole again. WHEW. Prob should stuck with Lapua brass. Haha. Over 26 rnds fired, My SD was 7.7 and my avg was 2792.

I want to give a BiG shout out to a couple pieces of gear I used that have been ESSENTIAL to this years success.
First is my rifle. This 308 flat out hammers (moa all day if I do my part :ROFLMAO:) The Kelblys smithed it up and it is redic accurate. These BR guys nailed the new Atlas action and their smiths are as good as anything Ive ever used. Ever. And Ive used a bunch.

Second is my bipod. If you guys havnt heard about the CKYE-POD you need to crawl out from that rock. Lower than an atlas and taller than an atlas with extensions in 2 seconds. And I love my atlas'. CKYE-PODS are phenominal. And im not pimping them because Ckye is my friend, they flat work. The PRS finale winner was using one.

2018 PRS FINALE 4.jpg


Third, is the new Burris XTR3 scope. I am still geeking out about it and being able to daybue it this week. It is amazing. I cant wait for production models to come available because I feel the glass is too good to be true. I don't want to gush and see the production not be as good and get called for being a fanboy that Im quickly becoming. I WILL keep you guys updated.

On to next year!!


Regards,
DT
 

Attachments

  • 2018 PRS FINALE 1.jpg
    2018 PRS FINALE 1.jpg
    160.6 KB · Views: 80
  • 2018 PRS FINALE 3.jpg
    2018 PRS FINALE 3.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 79
...
View attachment 6981195

This match I shot 168 gr Bergers using 43.8gr of N-140 jumping 015 and it shot super good. I would highly recommend VV powder. I use it in both my 6BR and theis 308 and my rifles have nvr shot so well. I was using factory HSM brass and was getting some horrible horizontal stringing. I chamfer inside/outside and boom one hole again. WHEW. Prob should stuck with Lapua brass. Haha. Over 26 rnds fired, My SD was 7.7 and my avg was 2792.

I want to give a BiG shout out to a couple pieces of gear I used that have been ESSENTIAL to this years success.
First is my rifle. This 308 flat out hammers (moa all day if I do my part :ROFLMAO:) The Kelblys smithed it up and it is redic accurate. ...
Cool rifle. The color isn't quite "me", but otherwise.
What's your barrel length?
 
Cool rifle. The color isn't quite "me", but otherwise.
What's your barrel length?

My favorite color...RW&B :love:


28" barrel
I wanted to run the 155's @ 3000 with no pressure (shhhh don't tell the ninjas) before I found out about the speed limit in most matches concerning 308. If I had to do it again I would go 26 so I could run factory ammo (Lapua and HSM factory ammo both over the 2800 speed limit wuth this 28 barrel)

On the other hand, factory HSM 178 and Nosler 175 ammo runs at 2720 & 2740 respectively in this barrel so that was nice. I may work up some 175 loads, but the 168's shot so well with zero pressure (very mild flattening but over 3 grains under what I worked up to with still no sticky bolt.) Better to be safe esp with rain and snow storms that roll in these spring shooting matches.


Regards,
DT
 
Last edited: