Tikka T1X

[ma smith]

The chassis has 3inch magwel, so its designed for centrefire...

Every un-necessary inch that GC is in front of the trigger is a design flaw.

.. lets just hope GC fits on that forend with the bipod still attached...

 

[beetroot]

The chassis has 3inch magwel, so its designed for centrefire...

Every un-necessary inch that GC is in front of the trigger is a design flaw.

.. lets just hope GC fits on that forend with the bipod still attached...

It makes sense to produce one chassis that can be used on the T1x and T3x, no different to any other chassis on the market.

However it does seem like they need an actual competition 22lr model, with the full length forend and a 24 or 26" heavy barrel. That way it'd actually match the centerfire model as a trainer and would make a killer off the shelf model for people wanting to get into the game.

 

[Emerson0311]

It makes sense to produce one chassis that can be used on the T1x and T3x, no different to any other chassis on the market.

However it does seem like they need an actual competition 22lr model, with the full length forend and a 24 or 26" heavy barrel. That way it'd actually match the centerfire model as a trainer and would make a killer off the shelf model for people wanting to get into the game.

Most shooters buying their first prs type 22 don’t believe in long barrels. They are sure they know better, without any experience. Experienced shooters will rarely buy an entry level rifle.

 

[beetroot]

Most shooters buying their first prs type 22 don’t believe in long barrels. They are sure they know better, without any experience. Experienced shooters will rarely buy an entry level rifle.

I don't think these will appeal to brand new shooters anyway, too expensive I imagine.

The market is missing a good factory option that splits the difference between a T1x MTR/457 and a full Vudoo build.
Might not appeal to the North American market but for the rest of the world R700 style builds aren't particularly accessible.
With the Anschutz offering like the 1761 APR, the AT-X, and the ACC chassis options I think there is a market there.

I don't think a 26" barrel would be universally appealing but maybe a a 20" and 24" barrel option would be ok.
If this existed as an option I 100% would buy one, certainly never would've rebarrelled my T1x, even without the hindsight of the headaches I've encountered.

 

[Emerson0311]

I don't think these will appeal to brand new shooters anyway, too expensive I imagine.

The market is missing a good factory option that splits the difference between a T1x MTR/457 and a full Vudoo build.
Might not appeal to the North American market but for the rest of the world R700 style builds aren't particularly accessible.
With the Anschutz offering like the 1761 APR, the AT-X, and the ACC chassis options I think there is a market there.

I don't think a 26" barrel would be universally appealing but maybe a a 20" and 24" barrel option would be ok.
If this existed as an option I 100% would buy one, certainly never would've rebarrelled my T1x, even without the hindsight of the headaches I've encountered.

The 700 footprint 22’s are not too difficult to find here in NA, but besides the generic Bergara, they are all about the same $$$.

 

[obx22]

Seriously?

 

[jthor]

Most shooters buying their first prs type 22 don’t believe in long barrels. They are sure they know better, without any experience. Experienced shooters will rarely buy an entry level rifle.

I'm not sure of many 22 PRS shooters running long barrels. Most are around 20-22" from what I have seen. So I don't believe the Pros believe in long barrels for 22LR either.

 

[Memberberries]

It says it has a crossover barrel which is what they called the barrel on the regular T1X so the weight is probably all in the stock. Fixes one of the two major things I wanted different on my T1X. Now for a bull barrel.

 

[Tikkaguy]

Seriously?

I’m not a huge prs type chasis guy, but I do like the Tac a1 and the trga1 chasis. But that thing is ugly as hell and isn’t half the point of the chasis game to get a folding stock? Would also depend on price of these things if they take off or not I would guess

 

[ma smith]

I'm not sure of many 22 PRS shooters running long barrels. Most are around 20-22" from what I have seen. So I don't believe the Pros believe in long barrels for 22LR either.

There's been a trend away from 16 and 20 in barrels over the last couple years. I think theres a couple reasons for this. One is balance, two is its believed longer barrels are less ammo picky. Its not terribly cheap to re-barrel rimfires, so you only see this probabl if/when guys building new rifles.

 

[Emerson0311]

There's been a trend away from 16 and 20 in barrels over the last couple years. I think theres a couple reasons for this. One is balance, two is its believed longer barrels are less ammo picky. Its not terribly cheap to re-barrel rimfires, so you only see this probabl if/when guys building new rifles.

That when I did it. For the reasons you mentioned.

 

[beetroot]

There is definitely a bit of a trend towards longer barrels. I think many people will stay a little shorter as guys want to use suppressors more frequently than with centrefire.

I'm guessing most people are doing it for balance reasons, now that 22 PRS is basically the same as centrefire PRS (barricade bench rest) there's zero reason to not go as long and heavy as possible for the same balance reasons.

Coverage of the 2023 IPRF Rimfire World Championship

There's been daily streams of the international rimfire championship in Italy these past few days.

www.snipershide.com

Theres some stats here from the 2023 IPRF world champs, you can see 20" is by far the most common barrel length, but you'll also see that the majority of people were shooting factory rifles and I'm guessing 90+% of these will have 20" barrels. There's quite a few 18" barrels there too but I bet almost all of them were on Begara B14Rs.
Around 40% are longer than 20" and I imagine almost everyone outside of real facotry rifles (T1x, CZ. RPR etc and opposed to pretend factory like the MPA/Vudoo rifles) are all in this 20"+ group.

 

[Emerson0311]

There is definitely a bit of a trend towards longer barrels. I think many people will stay a little shorter as guys want to use suppressors more frequently than with centrefire.

I'm guessing most people are doing it for balance reasons, now that 22 PRS is basically the same as centrefire PRS (barricade bench rest) there's zero reason to not go as long and heavy as possible for the same balance reasons.

Coverage of the 2023 IPRF Rimfire World Championship

There's been daily streams of the international rimfire championship in Italy these past few days.

www.snipershide.com

Theres some stats here from the 2023 IPRF world champs, you can see 20" is by far the most common barrel length, but you'll also see that the majority of people were shooting factory rifles and I'm guessing 90+% of these will have 20" barrels. There's quite a few 18" barrels there too but I bet almost all of them were on Begara B14Rs.
Around 40% are longer than 20" and I imagine almost everyone outside of real facotry rifles (T1x, CZ. RPR etc and opposed to pretend factory like the MPA/Vudoo rifles) are all in this 20"+ group.

I wanted balance with less overall weight than with my 20”.

 

[ma smith]

I wanted balance with less overall weight than with my 20”.

What's funny is the t1x balances alot better than the 20in ctr despirte the lower overal and barrel weight.

However, the second you put the t1x into a chassis w/ 4inch magwell, its going to balance like dogshit. This is why that new "competition chassis" (or whatever it is) is such a bad idea, since its built for a CTR mag not a T1x mag.

I don't want to sidetrack this thread by getting on a rant, but this kind of thing is what keeps the sport from developing. New shooters need help getting rifle's to balance properly.

The industry and the other leaders in the sport really need to study this problem.

 

[beetroot]

I wanted balance with less overall weight than with my 20”.

What are the details of your build?
Any pictures?

 

[beetroot]

Here's my rebarrelled T1x.
25.5" Medium Palma, in a KRG Bravo (no rear weights) there's about 2.5kg of steel in the forend, between a custom full length t slot weight, 14" steel arca rail and the additional weights on the rail.

With just the slot weight it balances pretty well, just in front of the magwell, but to get the balance point 4" further forward need the additional 1.6kg of arca rail and weights.

I imagine if it were a heavier profile barrel or 28" long I'd be able to have it lighter overall but I don't know there'd be much in it.

I have been playing with a lighterweight scope (XTR3 3.3-18) and that definitely balances easier, don't really need the additional weights on the ARCA rail.

 

[obx22]

Personal thoughts based on the video-
The chassis seems extremely well thought out with nearly every option you can desire in an aftermarket version and then some.
Having an adjustable anything that returns to a preset is an awesome step forward.
Integral Arca-Swiss rail, one less thing to buy and worry about coming loose.
Fully adjustable grip, when so few options are out there anyway
Only thing I can think of to change would be a longer forend and heavier profile 22-24” barrel.
I don’t give a flip about folding stocks, you go to a chassis for more flexibility in adjustment while having a stock that is the ultimate in rigidity.
Offer 15 round billet magazines and a true match trigger option for the win.

 

[obx22]

One additional observation I never see discussed.
While many of the custom builds out there offer faster than 16 inch twist barrels, Tikka and Sako went with 16.5 twist.

 

[Emerson0311]

What are the details of your build?
Any pictures?

My Tikka has gone down the road. It was a 20” IBI 12T Calfee IV chamber in an ACC Premier folder. Razor G3, 1 piece MDT mount, 50MOA rail. My Duece is 24” 1.06” 14T Prevail chamber barrel in a blue ACC Elite. ARC 30 MOA mount on a 20 MOA rail. Trigger tech Diamond 2 stage. I don’t think I have any pictures.