Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was thinking of buying their 1-8 and called twice, the last time leaving a message, I never heard back - just saying.
All good, I got a Burris 1-8 which is a nice scope and spent about half as much.... my gain.
There's a 1-8 Tract scope? I hadn't heard anything about that and don't see it on their site?
I can say they've been very responsive when I have contacted them, even replying after hours/on weekends.
Please post a review when you have a chance
A lot of folks don't WANT tree style reticles.No tree ret, no deal. Being ex-Nikon employees, I'd like to think they would avoid making the same mistakes of not offering compelling reticles...
Yeah that's the first thing I look at in a new optic. It immediately kills my interest when I don't see a tree. Can't imagine a reason people wouldn't want it.No tree ret, no deal. Being ex-Nikon employees, I'd like to think they would avoid making the same mistakes of not offering compelling reticles...
Bill (posts here as WJM) put together a nice review of the Toric for my website:
http://opticsthoughts.com/?p=2354
He compares to a few known quantities, so I hope this helps.
ILya
I bought a Toric to use on my PRS rifle last spring. I liked it so much I purchased another immediately after. I honestly can’t compare it to other scopes in its price range. I would say it is more on par with scopes in the $2000-2500 range. I have Razor and a Sig Tango6 and the glass is as good as those optics to my eyes anyway. I also really like the turrets a lot. The only drawbacks I see with it are the 30mm tube limits elevation and the lack of reticle choices. I would guess the owners at Tract are addressing that though and will probably release a new flagship optic with the features the Toric is lacking. At the price point though I don’t think there is a better optic on the market.
Ive tested a few Athlon's. The cheap scopes are a good deal for the money. Im not overly impressed with the BTR 1-6 or 4-29. Its not in the same league as Tract.
The Tract Toric is a LOW optic and based on what I saw the Toric is a nicer optic than the Aries Etr. The Aries ETR I handled was a very nice optic especially considering it is Made in China. It looks like they are really starting to figure optics out over there. That being said the Toric is nicer. I wouldn’t compare it to the Cronos because the Toric is significantly less money especially when they run their 10% off sales. I would say the Toric is on Par with the Cronus. I like the turrets on the Toric better but prefer the reticle on the Cronos. Athlon makes some fantastic optics that perform well above their price point. I just bought two Midas Tacs for Doug at Camera Land but at the $1000-1100 price range I haven’t handled anything that compared to the Toric.
I don't know, Athlon has a strong line up. From the reviews they have been getting on the conus btr, ares btr, ares etr, midas tac, they seem very well put together even though all but the cronus is china made but according to a guy on youtube that some don't like (rex reviews) he contacted Athlon and found out some very interesting details on his last initial review which was the midas tac, he is also reviewing the conus btr and ares etr. In reviews the tracking has been very very good, reticles and illumination very functional/effective and spot on, the same stainless steel turret mechanism is in the models specified, (although not sure about the ares btr). All at a very good price point and weight, the cronus btr is less weight with a 34mm tube than the tract, I was going to buy the tract but the it just didn't tickle my fancy for what options and weight. I'm wanting to buy a few scopes yet and two for sure will be the midas tac unless the ares btr gets a reticle like the midas tac or conus btr.
Koshkin, have you reviewed/handled any Athlons? What your thoughts on them if you did?
I'm a big fan of the Cronus BTR.
That said, the Tract Toric HD and Athlon Cronus BTR are both LOW manufactured optics (Tract with Schott glass, Athlon with LOW glass). The Cronus does have a 34mm tube and more elevation travel, but MAP on that scope is $1799, compared to the $1150 Tract is charging for a Toric HD. That's a $650 savings: the Toric HD is 36% cheaper than the Cronus (or the Cronus is 1.5 x the price of the Toric HD). And yes there are occasionally some dealers who may be selling the Athlon product below MAP (at risk of losing their dealer account), or the option to buy a Cronus on the used market.
Still, the Toric is retailing for less than the wholesale dealer cost of the Cronus BTR. The only thing really lacking in the Tract optic is a tree-type hold over reticle, otherwise it is comparable to optics twice it's price in terms of glass and overall build quality.
Not knocking Athon, they have really done a great job with the reticles in their most recent FFP tactical scopes, their customer service is good, and they seem to strive to produce a quality product. But, I think it's important to realize the difference in price, and thus value, between the Cronus and Toric HD, two scopes that are otherwise pretty comparable in terms of quality and features.
I don't know, Athlon has a strong line up. From the reviews they have been getting on the conus btr, ares btr, ares etr, midas tac, they seem very well put together even though all but the cronus is china made but according to a guy on youtube that some don't like (rex reviews) he contacted Athlon and found out some very interesting details on his last initial review which was the midas tac, he is also reviewing the conus btr and ares etr. In reviews the tracking has been very very good, reticles and illumination very functional/effective and spot on, the same stainless steel turret mechanism is in the models specified, (although not sure about the ares btr). All at a very good price point and weight, the cronus btr is less weight with a 34mm tube than the tract, I was going to buy the tract but the it just didn't tickle my fancy for what options and weight. I'm wanting to buy a few scopes yet and two for sure will be the midas tac unless the ares btr gets a reticle like the midas tac or conus btr.
Koshkin, have you reviewed/handled any Athlons? What your thoughts on them if you did?
The 3-15 is not a FFP design if that matters. The 4-20 does very well in low light, the glass has heavy CA but not out of the ordinary for this price category, resolution is the best I've seen for this price, it appears the 3-15's share a similar formula but not sure if they are a LOW product like the 4-20 Toric. Like ILya, I wish Tract had a tree reticle and something with .2, they tell me they are working on that so hopefully soon we'll see a better reticle from them. I would not hesitate to recommend the Toric as a top pick for the $1k category if you don't mind the reticle.Any ideas on how the 3-15 toric compares to the 4-20 in terms of low light performance and glass?
Just curious why you passed because of a 1" tube vs. 30mm? A larger tube doesn't necessarily mean a scope will be more robust or draw in more light, larger tubes generally allow for larger internals/travel but with a non turret SFP scope I'm not sure that would matter a whole lot.I was looking for a ( SFP ) in low vari-power scope . was looking at that TORIC UHD 2-10x42 BDC scope .
it has 1/2 MOA BDC Dots in Ret. . seemed was just what I was looking for . But when reading the Spec's . It was like WTF ? .. they only offer there models of 2-10x scopes with a ( 1" tube body ) . and I want 30mm main body, so I have to pass .
.
Gotcha, I'm the same way, no more 1" scopes except for an old Burris Fullfield II that is laying around somewhereNothing against 1'tube bodies . I just dont own any for lot of years now and all my ring sets are 30 and 34 . but the job I had 'in mind' for the toric 2-10 was for putting in a set of badger 30mm rings and simrad cap . ( For me ) and simrad the SFP is perfect with the 1/2 moa BDC dots and full size Ret. on lower powers . If using the Ret. subtension dots I would go to 10x . But after I saw it was a 1" tube on the toric, I endedup setting a vortex 30mm body in the badger rings .
.