Trinovid vs Conquest build quality

Rapidaffliction

The ghost of White2
Full Member
Minuteman
May 4, 2022
241
148
Fiddlers Green
Who this thinks that despite a subjectively better sight picture, and some better stats with the Zeiss... ...Who thinks the Leica is of better build quality, despite some viewing handicaps

Who thinks differently?

Who thinks the Zeiss is a better bino all the way around?

Is there anyone that thinks the Leica is a better build than the Genesis, despite views?

Who believes that the most important part of a bino is it's over-all view? ....and which parts of that view speak the loudest?

Who believes there's more to a bino than the finite view it produces?

I'd like to see what people's preferences have to say, in relation to personal prospectives, based off of 'said' mutating preferences... ....if that makes it across....
 
In most direct confrontations on trustworthy reviews on the net, the Conquest stand out as a winner in important optical categories:
1 light transmission - The measured light transmission is obviously higher at Zeiss Conquest even compared to the more expensive Ultravid !!!
2 clarity on the edges - The resolution is higher on the edges than Trinovid HD, although Conquest obviously has a wider FOV !!!
3 a greater eye relief, good for all spectacle wearers.

In my opinion, the only advantages of Trinovid HD vs Conquest is:
1 the quality of the finishes and more compact and stylish design !!!
2 close focus 1.75m vs 2.2m.
3 a possible subjective color preferences (warmer colors).

CA, Glare, Distorsion, Central Resolution all they are very similar, so we can say they are almost the same !!!

Which you choose would come down to personal preferences and perhaps current discounts."
I wish I had gotten the Genesis.
 
Well.. at the Leicas eyecups won't be falling off....and at least they're actually from the European continent, at least.
.

I still like the Leicas ..

If I had gotten the Genesis...I'd be saying, I wish I had gotten the Swaros..