They had to take 3 completed planes back. Who bought them? Who bought the ones on the line nearing completion? These aircraft (particularly the interior layouts and features) are highly customized and painted for the buyers.
Last edited:
Trump is back…the “Now What” thread
- Thread starter D̷e̷v̷i̷l̷D̷o̷c̷A̷Z̷
- Start date
Links?
Or are you referring to the statement in the article I posted:
"Potential alternative markets include India, Latin America and Southeast Asia but discussions have barely begun, industry sources said. Air India is seen among potential bidders on behalf of low-cost unit Air India Express."
None have been purchased, they said they want them. And even if sold, somebody has to eat the costs of re-configuring (even as far as engines).
Air India wants to acquire Boeing 737 MAXs bound for China
Air India is reportedly interested in acquiring more Boeing 737 MAXs originally ordered by Chinese airlines.www.aerotime.aero
too bad i don't trust bondi to do shit, but we can hope.
they are in negotiations. Things have moved fast since your original post on this in the other thread. India and Malaysia. India has done this before.
You sure your dislike for Trump isn’t excluding you from seeing the ENTIRE picture? If they can get the planes now they have obviously done the ROI on changes to the planes vs delayed receipt of them in the future. Boeing and these companies will work together to make it happen and both sides will be OK.
There are other areas to be genuinely concerned about but this isn’t one of them.
Last edited:
Trump Considering Auto Tariff Exemptions, White House Confirms
The White House has confirmed that tariff exemptions for automakers are being considered, amid concerns over their economic impact.
www.theepochtimes.com
Trump signs executive order requiring universities to disclose large foreign donations or risk federal funding
Harvard University received $151 million in foreign funds since January 2020, including from the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Bangladesh.
thepostmillennial.com
BREAKING: Attorney Ty Clevenger Exposes FBI's Role in Hiding Seth Rich Records and Perpetuating the Russia Hoax — Sends Scathing Letter to Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and Trump Officials | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
Attorney Ty Clevenger's recent correspondence with key officials reveals alarming allegations about the FBI's concealment of critical Seth Rich records, raising urgent questions about transparency and accountability in government.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
if trump wasn't elected, there would be countless more of these criminals here, and nobody trying to catch them.
revolver.news
FBI bombshell: Venezuelan officials are using gangbangers as ‘soldiers’ inside US... - Revolver News
This is a national security nightmare—and it all happened on Biden’s watch.
revolver.news
To be fair ,Trumps maximum pressure sanctions on Venezuela , fake Huan Guaido president that never won an election , outright theft of Venezuelan rafineries in US. That broke economy that was barely afloat ,was the catalyist that kicked off mass migration from Venezuela including all these gangbangers.if trump wasn't elected, there would be countless more of these criminals here, and nobody trying to catch them.
FBI bombshell: Venezuelan officials are using gangbangers as ‘soldiers’ inside US... - Revolver News
This is a national security nightmare—and it all happened on Biden’s watch.
Similary on Iran Trump now basicaly wants a deal much like the one he blew up in his first term when Natanyahu fucked him over , lots of incoherent policies , beaking down shit then using duct tape fixes
On tariffs it looks like he will fold before they really hit hard on US economy
Last edited:
Why on earth would Trump abide by what a district court judge says? They have absolutely no authority over the executive branch and the President. I would continue on and ignore them completely.
Exactly what laws? Judges don't make laws.
No they determine if laws are being broken. In this case, the constitution is being violated. So, Trump does not obey laws? Unless I missed the coronation, he was elected president, not ordained King. Congress and the states have the power to regulate elections. Not the president.
Judges and even juries are not infallible, this is why appeals exist.
Some judges act corruptly and some juries are compromised.
Exactly how is the constitution being violated.
The rest of the hyperbole in your post doesn't matter. Just get down to the facts.
I'm not saying you're entirely wrong. I just want to know if you can articulate it without me handing you the answer.
They are humans, but the two have different tasks.
As are politicians.
The elections clause specifies that Congress, and the states individually and locally, have the authority to regulate elections.
Nothing I said was wrong.
Really. Don't bother.Perhaps we should have congress appoint federal judges. Anything wrong with that?
Very good.
Still wrapped in a bunch of tangential emo butthurt bullshit but you finally got there.
The original question was, effectually, "why would Trump abide by a judges decision?" and you responded with some lame kindergarten level, booger throwing, passive aggressive bullshit without even attempting to answer the question.
I'm not at all saying you shouldn't throw boogers. Just saying make an effort to articulate some facts when you have them and maybe people wouldn't think you're a waste of skin. Booger coated facts are just as nutritious as sugar coated facts.
Seems like you're not really here to share knowledge or elevate the conversation.
Last edited:
Sorry, I assume some level of knowledge of our political system, and should not have to explain every question. Obviously you do not read any posts but mine to come to the conclusions you have. Not even your own.
The question was:
"Why on earth would Trump abide by what a district court judge says? "
It seemed to not question this instance only, but in general. Which begs the question:
"So Trump does not need to obey any laws?"
See how that works? But thanks for making a lame attempt at speaking for others. I guess.
And not even answering the question. Actually, either one.
Last edited:
JUST IN: President Trump Pardons Nevada Judge Michele Fiore 24 Hours After The Gateway Pundit Report | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor
President Trump's recent pardon of Nevada Judge Michele Fiore, just hours after a critical report, highlights the ongoing tensions within the justice system. Fiore's powerful statement on resilience and faith adds depth to this unfolding story.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
In general it does not exist. Most people aren't even aware of the constitution or bill of rights beyond "we the peepuh", "I can say what I want", "muh guns" and "you can't make me".
Knowledge of the powers and limitations of the three branches? Watch some videos, there is a huge portion of the population that doesn't even understand there are three branches and think the are House, Senate and POTUS or States, Congress and POTUS are the branches.
Most fanatical "liberals" I meet believe the FED should have all the power to force the states to all be the same and POTUS should have the power to make treaties all by hisself ... but only when a liberal is in power. Most fanatical "conservatives" I meet believe the FED should have very little power because they seem to think all the states are the same already and the POTUS should have the power to do everything they *think* Trump is doing now ... but only when a "conservative" is in power.
No, a working knowledge of the political system is not pervasive in our society or even on gun forums.
Excuses, excuses, excuses.
The context was most definitely "this instance" so choosing not address "this instance" in the answer is just lazy pigheadedness.
You could have provided some details about exactly which parts of Trump's EO the judge had an issue with and which parts she decided to let stand. But, no.
You didn't even attempt to provide any kind of any part of an answer at all. You just deflected. Selfish. Weak. Pathetic.
See how that works? But thanks for making a lame attempt at speaking for others. I guess.
And not even answering the question. Actually, either one.
I wasn't speaking for anyone else. I was addressing you directly about your "answer". The original question about Trump dodging judges decisions was directed at you. I wouldn't presume to answer that on your behalf and deny you the privilege of demonstrating your superior mental prowess.
Do you mean your question about anything wrong with congress appointing judges? I took it as more deflection but if you really don't know and need me to answer it for you that's another clause in the constitution.
Other than the question you did not ask about Trump dodging judges decisions and the one about congress appointing judges you only recently asked a question about the functionality of your conversational tactics with regard to whether or not they work. They don't.
Was there another question?
ETA: I spotted another one about Trump obeying laws. Apologies for missing it, I assumed it was more deflection but in case it's actual ignorance I'll give it a go.
Obviously not all the laws, I mean, who does.
And, in general, without disobedience laws don't get tested.
Parks, Mandela, Gandhi, Susan B Anthony, any number of revolutionists ... all chose not to follow laws and influenced change toward what we have today and generally consider "better" than before.
Do you honestly not understand how this works? That laws and even the constitution must be tested from time to time to facilitate change. Or is it just more deflection?
BTW, I heard the SAVE Act has passed the House which supposedly will require proof of citizenship to vote and maybe some other stuff.
Last edited:
I give most people the benefit of me not knowing what they know and give them the opportunity to explain their statements.
On this forum, it might be a silly and unnecessary principle. Perhaps I should just sit back and enjoy the Cro-Magnon log-beating. You'll have to excuse me if I don't dance.
McCabe memos show how disgraced FBI leader kept Trump-Russia collusion hoax alive in 2017
Newly-declassified Crossfire Hurricane records reveal the key role that Andrew McCabe played in perpetuating the Russiagate hoax. There are still people who believe it.
justthenews.com
Similar threads
