Thanks. Is it removable? I’m thinking EH-1 and getting a rod to the bore w/o pulling the stock. I’ll check them out, maybe it could be applied with Dual Lock.
Here's one on my EH1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks. Is it removable? I’m thinking EH-1 and getting a rod to the bore w/o pulling the stock. I’ll check them out, maybe it could be applied with Dual Lock.
I prefer to call it a murseI always keep my purse in the truck when hunting.. don't like it attached to my stock.
I've had the SKMR and SKMR3, I'm using the
I have the k318, s and b us 3-20, and the tt315m.What do you want to know? The TT is going to be tops in overall IQ, but the Kahles is no slouch. Kahles K318i is my favorite ultra short right now, I've had both Schmidt's Ultra Shorts and my favorite of the two was the 5-20, the K318i was better optically than my US 3-20 at the top end. TT focuses to 50y while Kahles goes to 25y, Kahles has top parallax and better illumination and a better reticle (until TT comes out with the Gen 3XR in the 315M). The TT is lighter but the Kahles is shorter. Kahles has 30 mil of elevation while TT has 12 mil after you zero, it is a double turn 6 mil turret. TT has wider FOV but stops at 15x while Kahles has less FOV but not bad and goes to 18x.
While I like all of them, I prefer the glass on the tt and s and b over the kahles. To me, there also is a fairly significant difference in field of view over the kahles. What the tt provides in such a light package is without peer.
SKMR3 with the K318i. I like both, it is a tiny dot that sometimes gets lost though so the illumination helps there. My favorite tree reticle is the MR4 from Minox, I prefer the dots vs the solid lines in the tree section, but I can use both effectively.
While I like all of them, I prefer the glass on the tt and s and b over the kahles. To me, there also is a fairly significant difference in field of view over the kahles. What the tt provides in such a light package is without peer.
I'm not sure. I guess it's possible. Do note that I looked through all of them sequentially at the same target on multiple occasions. Could be just how my eyes perceives them. Honestly, they are all fantastic, and the differences are small.You make me want to try another S&B Ultra Short 3-20, the one I had was not as good as my Kahles K318i, I might have had a US that struggled a bit or a stellar copy of the K318i I don't know. True the FOV of the Schmidt is better but the resolution of the Kahles was enough to make the difference in its favor, that along with the much shorter body and reticle. Looks like the MSR2 reticles might be coming soon, maybe...
Re: Hendoldt
...and reticle selection.
The Henny is one of the low light kings in this category, probably the closest competitor to the TT 315M but I am not thrilled with the reticles they offer; however, that is me and others may find them to their liking. Schmidt also now makes a FFP 4-16x56 Ultra Bright, but no idea how it compares to the Henny.You can choose an h59 or a .2 mil hash reticle. I know everyone has their favorite designer reticles nowadays but those pretty much cover the bases for visible and usable at 4x while still functional and precise at 16x. A lot better than a g2xr which is pretty darn thin...
The Henny is one of the low light kings in this category, probably the closest competitor to the TT 315M but I am not thrilled with the reticles they offer; however, that is me and others may find them to their liking. Schmidt also now makes a FFP 4-16x56 Ultra Bright, but no idea how it compares to the Henny.
The MSR. Grin.Gen2xr or gen2 mil dot
or
H59 or the excellent .2 mil hash hensoldt reticle. Or an older 4-16 with the awesome nh-1.
everyone likes their own reticles but there's a clear winner to me here ?
The Henny is one of the low light kings in this category, probably the closest competitor to the TT 315M but I am not thrilled with the reticles they offer; however, that is me and others may find them to their liking. Schmidt also now makes a FFP 4-16x56 Ultra Bright, but no idea how it compares to the Henny.
Dang if that's not a nice looking mount and I like the two bolt design, was about to call you about pricing but then saw that they have no canted mount optionsA Kahles K318i 3.5-18x50 mounted in a Scalarworks 34mm LEAP/SCOPE mount
![]()
If Hensoldt were to make a 4-20x56, well now we're talking, but it would probably weigh a bit more than 30oz and cost quite a bit more than the current 4-16, but I've always had my eye on the 4-16x56 due to its lower weight and 56mm objective. That being said, I have done numerous low light tests with alpha glass at 50mm and 56mm and find it very hard to discern the difference - I think most alpha glass today is so good that the advantages the 56mm objectives used to have are not as apparent as they once were, yes, the physical difference and ensuing exit pupil cannot be overlooked, but neither can our eyes ability to adjust through the scotopic transition. Keep in mind this is for alpha quality glass which is, in large part, many of the scopes mentioned in this thread (I think anytime a thread is posted asking for alternatives to Tangent Theta you are mostly looking at alpha quality glass, or tier one or whatever you want to call the scopes that generally run above $3k).+1 and I happen to have a like new one for sale for a steal compared to buying new...
Dang if that's not a nice looking mount and I like the two bolt design, was about to call you about pricing but then saw that they have no canted mount optionsAlways frustrates me when companies only seem to focus on BDC scopes and offer some great looking mounts but with no canted options really limit themselves towards the long range crowd.
Maybe you can influence him to consider a 20 MOA versionPhil at Scalarworks makes awesome products, but it's a very small shop so he doesn't make a ton of new products very often.
Maybe you can influence him to consider a 20 MOA versionLet him know there is definitely a market for it...
Not much market for those, only ZCO, a Hensoldt and a couple Zeiss', but a 20 MOA mount would be much more marketableI wanted 36mm mounts, maybe in 2020![]()
Not much market for those, only ZCO, a Hensoldt and a couple Zeiss', but a 20 MOA mount would be much more marketable![]()
But very few with QD and a nice hinged design. We digress from the thread topic, sorry about that everyone.Oh I agree, but there are tons of great mounts out there![]()
How does the 3-12 hensoldt stack up against the TT 315m in terms of low light performance? Have you seen any quality changes through the several ownership changes?
I "hunt" in the southeast, and it gets awful dark under the pines way before legal shooting time is up. The razor 2 has always handled it very well, but the thing is an absolute brick.