Ok,
This is why tuners “have a bad name”
Every time there is a question there are confusing answers
One guy says they make groups smaller
One guy says they are for positive compensation
Positive compensation is mainly vertical and groups are “round”
One guy says it’s just another way to tune, meaning all “tuning is equal”
Both bring up data which is 8-15 years old, while valid there are hundreds of not thousands of data points available
Neither will help in listing the winners and their gear of the top shooters in each division, so a consensus could be had
And from that consensus comms will be started looking for their opinion aboot tuners and effects.
Neither said let’s go get instruments and really vet this stuff out
No one “pro tuner” has created a universal tuning process, as all tuners are just weight.
No one “pro tuner” has shown a formula for choosing tuner weight.
Additionally all “pro tuner” consistently state that tuners function by engineering/physics.
If that is true, a linear process of how to tune and what weight tuner should be readily available, as it’s just math.
Is it not plainly obvious why tuner discussions turn to a disaster /pissing match
I should clear up this possible misunderstanding, camel speaks of specific weight to tune for positive compensation to widen the window , I am speaking about universal tuners which are not weighted specifically to that rifle combo .
If your not using a tuner your groups can be made smaller by using one.
I don't sell or market anything.
I also don't post groups shot at 10 yards