Vortex Razor HD Gen III 6-36x56

I won a USPSA state championship with a Kimber - that doesn't mean it's the best tool for the job, nor that better tools have come out since then.

I won the American Handgun World Shootoff with a Glock in unclassified division, then later in B stock with a STI 40, but I also could have won it with a Kimber. Because you can't miss fast enough to win. Which brings it back to "practicality".

A .2 mil reticle is a .2 mil reticle and the .05 mil reticle thickness can help you make the holds out better when down on mid magnification - as I found out.

Disagreement is fine and people use what they prefer.
I've actually helped design reticles presently in use in currently available rifle scopes, one of which is also a favorite .2 mil. I've also won matches with it.

But the H reticles do work and work well for holdovers/offs. I'm proof of it.
 
Your sarcasm proves jack-shit. 1 vs. 100,000 other non-Horus reticle scopes being used in those comps worldwide.

However, amidst all your pointless drivel and egomania, you did make my point for me in your last sentence… If you know what you’re doing, you can win with just about anything…Ask Carlos Hathcock, or Chuck Mawhinny.

You still don’t need the H59. But for some folks, it’s just like Imaginationland, where “If you believe it to be real, then It’s real…” Whatever subconscious reinforcement you need that helps you win, helps you win.

Imagineland, that's like you ever winning anything except scope deutsche of SH.
 
Reticle is nothing but a ruler. That's it. Stop over complicating things. Unless you are under fire or shooting a match where speed is of essence, dial.

The VAST majority of people would be better off with a simple reticle like the JTAC or PR3 to make spotting trace and your shot easier and make it easier to focus on the aiming point.
 
I just dial the solution. However, I do like how Strelok Pro will true the reticle and give you a target to look at. AB Quantum can show you a reticle but I am not seeing what does for a person. As was well said, you don't really need a reticle vision to just shoot. If elevation is 2 MOA, then dial or hold 2 MOA, for example.

Edited to add, I do like clear reticles and have used them to range a target in thick woods. The laser reflects off a leave at 30 yards. But I know the average width of a tree in AO and do the math.
 
Yup. I joined quite a while ago. Then life got in the way and I didn't sboot for almost 8 years. I took a long range precision shooting class this summer and got back into. Started reading this forum again A lot has changed, I'm glad y'all know everything.
Yep, 10 years ago, a reticle tree meant something entirely different. 4 mils in 2014 is actually 5.2 mils now. Inflation and what not.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: carbonbased
Yup. I joined quite a while ago. Then life got in the way and I didn't sboot for almost 8 years. I took a long range precision shooting class this summer and got back into. Started reading this forum again A lot has changed, I'm glad y'all know everything.
I wouldn't worry about it. Not that you are. deathbeforedishwater is like that with everyone. It's hard to remember a post where he was being civil and downright insulting. That's just his way. I get a giggle out of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbk5
After a bit of reading and learning, I'm leaning hard toward a purchase of one of these G3s. Happy to see the bugs are worked out.

One final question; I see some folks mention returning their G3s for the "elevation turret lock delete". I think I'd like to do this also. Is this requst the same as a warranty claim, or does it involve a service charge?

Thanks in advance
 
I’d recommend you get it and try it first. A lot of people did it as some of the earlier ones would drop easily but that doesn’t happen now so it’s not a bad option to have. You can always do it later.
 
Fella didn’t ask you guys if he needed it…

It’s a warranty service so far as I know. I’ve not heard anyone say they paid for it.

No he didn’t but sometimes people think they need something and don’t realize they don’t. There has been changes since these came out and people were using spacers and having the locking mechanism disabled. Just don’t want him doing something he thinks he needs and then finding out he didn’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mattv931
After a bit of reading and learning, I'm leaning hard toward a purchase of one of these G3s. Happy to see the bugs are worked out.

One final question; I see some folks mention returning their G3s for the "elevation turret lock delete". I think I'd like to do this also. Is this requst the same as a warranty claim, or does it involve a service charge?

Thanks in advance

Vortex does the turret mod no charge. Definitely try yours first though, I have heard they are a lot better now. I really like the scope and I think you will be happy if you decide to get one.
 
How is everyone liking the EBR - 7D reticle thus far?

This question from someone who’s used the MSR reticle almost exclusively for more than a decade.

Been out for a few years and most like it. I really like it personally. Great for holds. The tree isn’t overly heavy so coming from a standard reticle shouldn’t be that hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edsel
As far as a tree reticle it's pretty nice not over crowded but I would love if vortex would put a reticle similar to the zco MPCT1x


That would be kind of a back pedal. Used those standard reticle for years but after going to the trees about 12 years ago and their hold versatility I’d never go back to a standard style reticle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edsel and Schw15
That would be kind of a back pedal. Used those standard reticle for years but after going to the trees about 12 years ago and their hold versatility I’d never go back to a standard style reticle.
For my elr stuff I'm starting to like less and less with my reticles and honestly I never use the tree for anything dial elevation and hold wind or dial wind for certain matches
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edsel
For my elr stuff I'm starting to like less and less with my reticles and honestly I never use the tree for anything dial elevation and hold wind or dial wind for certain matches

Yeah I can see that and for that you could just ignore the tree altogether and use the main reticle like a standard style. Dial it up and use the horizontal for wind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edsel
Been out for a few years and most like it. I really like it personally. Great for holds. The tree isn’t overly heavy so coming from a standard reticle shouldn’t be that hard.

As far as a tree reticle it's pretty nice not over crowded but I would love if vortex would put a reticle similar to the zco MPCT1x

For my elr stuff I'm starting to like less and less with my reticles and honestly I never use the tree for anything dial elevation and hold wind or dial wind for certain matches



It’s going to be an iffy departure from the stadia and rulers for me.

Gotten so used to this routine…
 
  • Like
Reactions: plong


It’s going to be an iffy departure from the stadia and rulers for me.

Gotten so used to this routine…


Why? No one is shooting man sized UKD targets out there so that little speed range brackets aren’t super useful and the 7D has .1 mil bracket area to mil targets if you wanted.

IMG_0136.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tx_Aggie and Edsel
Why? No one is shooting man sized UKD targets out there so that little speed range brackets aren’t super useful and the 7D has .1 mil bracket area to mil targets if you wanted.

We used those cardboard torso and quarter sized steel torso targets at unknown distances.

You can even alter the ratios relative to known range landmarks to do some really quick mental math.

The stadia are quite convenient to use.

No one little dot two little dots three little dots four little dots five little dots oh no that was really four little dots so that’s um two hundred uh no three hundred thirty five meters where’s my calculator routine to dither over.

All I’m saying is that it’s going to be a different “manual of arms” and “overall experience” for me.

These trees would appear to suit gamers more, for quick follow - up holds.

My Razors in black should be inbound soon.
 
Last edited:
I believe they will sell well and that this is obviously aimed at the ATACR 7-35 market. Since Vortex's street pricing is typically about 30% off MSRP, the Razor will be about $800 less expensive than the ATACR. Additionally, many shooters may find it more difficult to defend the higher cost of rival scopes thanks to Vortex's Mil/LEO discount. Kahles peaks at 25x, while S&B, ZCO, and TT surpass $4K. I acknowledge that there is a market group that is accustomed to and content with spending more than $4K on optics, and they are probably not going to be persuaded by this offer.

A reliable reticle is EBR-7. The Vortex EBR (on Razors since Gen 1) was followed by the NightForce MIL-XT and Kahles SKMR3 reticles, and I have to assume that the Razors' competitive pressure played a role in that. Although they are within 6 ounces of the ATACR, I really wish Vortex had managed to keep the weight under 40 ounces. This will probably be well-liked by PRS.

Because Vortex is exerting pressure on the market, I believe that this release benefits everyone, even if you choose to remain with the competitor. I wonder if their AMG is also moving in this direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tx_Aggie
I believe they will sell well and that this is obviously aimed at the ATACR 7-35 market. Since Vortex's street pricing is typically about 30% off MSRP, the Razor will be about $800 less expensive than the ATACR. Additionally, many shooters may find it more difficult to defend the higher cost of rival scopes thanks to Vortex's Mil/LEO discount. Kahles peaks at 25x, while S&B, ZCO, and TT surpass $4K. I acknowledge that there is a market group that is accustomed to and content with spending more than $4K on optics, and they are probably not going to be persuaded by this offer.

A reliable reticle is EBR-7. The Vortex EBR (on Razors since Gen 1) was followed by the NightForce MIL-XT and Kahles SKMR3 reticles, and I have to assume that the Razors' competitive pressure played a role in that. Although they are within 6 ounces of the ATACR, I really wish Vortex had managed to keep the weight under 40 ounces. This will probably be well-liked by PRS.

Because Vortex is exerting pressure on the market, I believe that this release benefits everyone, even if you choose to remain with the competitor. I wonder if their AMG is also moving in this direction.
You are aware NF has a mil/leo discount as well that's between 25-40% of real MSRP...not crazy inflated bullshit numbers like vortex.
 
Trees are for military applications. Most high level shooters have migrated back to a simple cross hair with .2 hashes. Gas guns or other games guys may still like them but for bolt guns, I think the non tree reticles are only getting more popular. It makes seeing small , hidden, greyed out targets easier and spotting your shot easier IMO. Plus why spend 4-6k for the best glass on the earth only to overlay a bunch of shit you will never use on it.
 
You are aware NF has a mil/leo discount as well that's between 25-40% of real MSRP...not crazy inflated bullshit numbers like vortex.

^ Yep.

This is why my last scope was a 7-35 ATACR and not another G3 Razor. I actually got the NF for a couple hundred less than I can get the Vortex now.
 
I hope Vortex designs a more DNT/MIL-XT (0.2 MIL) style reticle for the Razor G4… That continuously fatter coniferous tree reticle is kind of played-out, and blocks a lot of background view. Plus, if my intended target requires more than a couple MILs of windage, I’m dialing it.