Rifle Scopes Warne RAMP Vs Burris PEPR Mount Pics: more coming

BobD

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
May 5, 2012
498
1
42
Picked this up recently, figured I would share it with those who are interested in a mount of this type.

Very nicely machined and fit is very nice, especially considering its price point. Competition at this quality is noticeably more expensive. It appears to be an excellent value-

ad1dee0f9833605fde35bcf91e9cb32f.jpg


8fba5fb389f43e9a31d02c361e0a01ee.jpg


8b2c0e1ad4cf1ce42745a7f453191ed0.jpg


f1ea74369c91e21daaee5977de78fa1e.jpg


* just a minute, having a problem with the attached pics. Should be up shortly
 
Re: Warne RAMP Mount: A Quick Look

dad73246c4d187c5a59d6512d027dab6.jpg


The finish looks as if it was integral to a slick AR upper
2d52659d34c5e6d88d475f8b79e5382b.jpg


No marks, very clean surface
86e1af35c22cb063e818a8d70b21a836.jpg


2662587cd49e47148da95e3b9ccea0f8.jpg


Deep threads. 45 offsets are both detachable. Rear base is permanent.
72c8e5d9b1b5b672a0bf9363df6a86bc.jpg


2337d8779cdc33a486b32767eaaac107.jpg


No... It does not leave marks
Look forward to see how it holds up, which I've heard is very well
* you cannot run buis with this mount*

Hope this helps someone if they've been looking
 
Re: Warne RAMP Mount: A Quick Look

I've been looking, I have a $100 Warne gift certificate I picked up off a prize table. I've been hoping they would come out with a QD version, but your observation that BUIS wouldn't fit may explain why they haven't- although I can fix that easily enough with a band saw.

I may just opt for a set of rings instead. Sucks, I need AR mounts.


Thanks for the review.
 
Re: Warne RAMP Mount: A Quick Look

It is a bit odd... With the length of the back rail I would have like to have seen an additional cross bolt or increased surface area where the clamp could extend. I'm not sure if the back area helps reinforce any additional distribution of the weight bearing on the front end in its current configuration. It is a little disappointing that there is no option to remove it. I was aware of this when I bought it and decided I would give it a try anyway.

I believe Warne does sell matching 45 degree offset front mounts to configure irons "Dueck" style. Might be a bit a bit obstructed if using larger turrets (unless mounting on the left). Also, base is rated for 65 in lbs so I'm expecting a good hold and return to zero.

Warne rings look great as well, especially their tactical line. My initial plan was to buy a cantilever riser and to use a lower set of their rings instead for easier transition between rifles. In the end, after some thought and discussion I decided that I wanted to stay more in control torquing myself (opposed to qd) and to use as few pieces put together as possible (more one piece, less touching and moving things around).

I'd like to see how the rings turn out for you if you get them,
Good luck either way-
 
Re: Warne RAMP Mount: A Quick Look

Some additional information:

-Available in 1" and 30mm

-Colors: Black, Dark Earth, Red, Blue, "Zombie" Green

-1 Piece CNC machined aluminum

-Rings are reinforced with steel sleeves for torx screws

-Base clamping system is steel including the 1/2"hex nuts (65 in lbs)

-1 3/4" Forward offset

-A645~45 is front offset mount that matches RAMP mount (Warne model)

* I will edit this into the above post when I get the chance*
 
Re: Warne RAMP Mount Pics: A Quick Look

This is an excerpt from an email I got from Warne yesterday:

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> I don’t believe we have plans for anything like that with qd levers.  The problem is that all of those AR style mounts use mil-spec lugs, and if we use levers, they will no longer be mil-spec.  If you really want to be able to switch optics, I would just recommend some of our QD aluminum ultra high flat top AR rings.  That way you could have a true quick detach system. The downside is that you would not get the extra eye relief that the Ramp style mounts give.  </div></div>

Not sure what I'll use this certificate for at this point, I need the extra eye relief. It's funny that Warne, who is known for their QD rings, isn't offering a QD mount. Even the Burris PEPR mount is QD now. I know everyone doesn't need QD, but it's a common requirement for this type of mount and is Warnes forte. I may just pick up some standard rings, I'll always need them someday.
 
Re: Warne RAMP Mount Pics: A Quick Look

That was one of my plans as well, the money i saved this time skipping bought me a new torque wrench so i'm not too bitter.You could always try using a scout rail (I was looking at G&G, they have 2 types, 1 where you can still use buis) and grab a nice set of their tactical rings.

I agree it's strange they haven't offered QD (or at the least consideried developing them) seeing that they wil go to "zombie green" to please some customers. I know there's no intent but maybe someday they will develop one.



Tenaja: the mount is level, there is no incline. I don't believe they offer any of the RAMP mounts with an incline
 
Re: Warne RAMP Mount Pics: A Quick Look

Burris' QD PEPR Mount

Comes with smooth rings as well as the pic tops...
I will post a shot next to Warne's RAMP mount shortly with some additional comments

c685ece4c88756988db0e4146cd6d87b.jpg

Mount provides 2" forward off rail
0a86de205ed8e36078e14df7c14ec60b.jpg

6 hole ring caps similar to their XTR rings
Screw threads are more shallow than I anticipated
4253d7fba86cd837dc9dd80bd13b9784.jpg

The fit does not appear to be as nice as Warne's
8ea14e07977b7cc461f2604ed0353c2c.jpg

I have yet to form an opinion on the return capabilities of the QD levers. They are smooth but not as robust as their competition. At just over $80 I wasn't expecting them to be.
7cd97f365d1356f15d8702f5f652305a.jpg


Overall, it appears decently made for a budget mount. My initial impressions are that is not in the same league as the Warne. I'm curious to see how it holds up-

I will post a side by side later and clean this thread up a bit. Sorry for it being scattered.