If one of these come on the market, you will see Buffalo Winter and I in a cage match over who gets it first...
Sirhr
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If one of these come on the market, you will see Buffalo Winter and I in a cage match over who gets it first...
Anyone? I really have no idea.So what happens in these two mistakes? And what do the cases look like? Just curious.
Already been done... It's called the .30-06......
There was a a company that made semi auto .338 LMs. Be if their offerings was a .338 LM shortened and modified to shoot a 900ish grain .510 bullet subsonic. Can’t remember the name of the company but that would be an interesting platform.In bolt guns some guys chopped cases and made a 50WSM and shot BMG bullets. That would be awesome in an AR10 but I can't find a lot of info on it.
There was a a company that made semi auto .338 LMs. Be if their offerings was a .338 LM shortened and modified to shoot a 900ish grain .510 bullet subsonic. Can’t remember the name of the company but that would be an interesting platform.
Huh…?The large AR Market is cool.
I'd like to see a slightly elongated AR10 Lower.
Put in .998 b.c. .338-.375 WSMs in there.
Slightly wider AR10 mags. 20rounds.
Options to put in Raufoss Bullets.
2 km transonic 8-9lb AR10s would be great.
Huh…?
How?
Have you done it?You have a physically longer AR10 Lower.
Upsized 20 Round mags to take .338-.375 WSM's or a Slightly thinner (1mm) 65,000 psi
Casing. Something in between .308 and .300 WSM casing. Not much out there like that.
Load in super high b.c. .338's-.375's. that weigh like 160-250 grains. (Aluminum filled lathed copper). Blackwater makes these in Italy.
Load them long OAL.
Carbon fiber Bull Barrel. 12.5-16".
Go for high velocities. 3200-3400 fps.
Should work.
My 45 Raptor has a 24” barrel, rifle gas
Have you done it?
Please do the math for me on this. Remember the magazine overall length is 2.85 inches at max. (depending on the manufacturer) And we’re going to shoot 2 km out of this?
Where does this AR10 lower and upper combination come from?
Your specs so far are:No.
The SR25 magazine would have to be lengthened. Same with the AR10 magwell.
Don't have to get to 2kms. But you can lay hate down and suppression at 2kms easy on FA or SA. Could go transonic at 2000-3000 yards depending on specs.
AR10 lower could come out of any shop.
Uppers need not much change.
Steel or CF Bull barrels chambered in .33-37 WSM or the like.
Simple. Barely an inconvenience. Just design a new upper, and bolt carrier group, and lower, and magazine.Your specs so far are:
338wsm to 375 wsm
Standard AR10 upper/lower
12.5”-16” barrel
160-250 grain bullets
3200-3400 fps (out of a 12.5” to 16” barrel?)
Transonic to 2000-3000 yards
What are the load specs for this round?
Powder type/ weight…COAL….?
How are we doing this now?
Thanks
Simple. Barely an inconvenience. Just design a new upper, and bolt carrier group, and lower, and magazine.
So it’s a single shot upper?Open up the bolt face on an SR25 0.5mm since she's overbuilt to accommodate a casing that is 1mm wider then .308 and 1mm slimmer then a WSM.
I don't know jack shit about powder. Jack....shit.
Upper can be an elongated SR25 with .338 WSM
4 inch COAL.
That’s gonna be a fun one…Open up the bolt face on an SR25 0.5mm since she's overbuilt to accommodate a casing that is 1mm wider then .308 and 1mm slimmer then a WSM.
I don't know jack shit about powder. Jack....shit.
Able to learn.
Upper can be an elongated SR25 with .338 WSM
4 inch COAL.
So 140-160 grain .338 Flat Line 256gr profile @ .862 b.c. with a below max charge of XYZ @ 3100 FPS @ 16 inch barrel.
65,000 psi max.
Am I on Crack or what? Is this even "possible".
So it’s a single shot upper?
Do we have to remove the charging handle and BCG to load it?
What’s the reamer free bore spec?
View attachment 8106148
308 P-mag next to a mocked up 338 WSM case, with a Lehigh 338 257 grain … 3.63” COAL, that’s with the bullet barely sitting in the mouth of the case
Next is a piece of WSM brass backed up to 375 WSM, with a .375 353 Lehigh barely sitting in the case mouth 3.94" COAL
On the right is a 300 RUM with a 215 in it.
I’m pretty sure a 4.0” COAL is not going to work in a AR10
highbclowgr…
OK I’ve got to ask. …
Since your abbreviated forum name is …high ballistic coefficient low grain…are you selling these bullets?
and who makes a 130 grain bullet with the same ballistic coefficient, and bullet profile, as a 250 grain berger 338?
You’ve been on this forum for less than one week, and you’ve mentioned this type of bullet, in nearly every post and thread that you have been in.
Come on man...I am phishing for information based on these designs.
WW2 and beyond, (Ludwig Vorgrimler) thought
7.92x40 was a great idea. High B.C. and low grain bullets. The Americans obviously trumped this idea in favor of 7.62x51.
If you apply this concept to modern loadings, you get really great ballistics, albeit at the slight sacrifice of sectional density.
You get insane drop charts and velocities that make 6.5 Creedmore look obsolete by comparison.
Badland Precision is into this concept.
Blackwater was into this concept with high psi casings. Hard to find specs with them.
Not many bullet manufacturers out there doing this. I have been scouring the internet and there is very little to go off of.
Again. Not a radical idea, but the results can be amazing. In theory.
Please post some video for posterity when you show us how to push super high bc 338 bullets to 3400 fps from an AR10 platform. Pressures would be way above 65000 psi. That or all of us retards are doing it wrong running long action magnum boltface rifles trying to push our 300 gr bullets to 2850 fps.You have a physically longer AR10 Lower.
Upsized 20 Round mags to take .338-.375 WSM's or a Slightly thinner (1mm) 65,000 psi
Casing. Something in between .308 and .300 WSM casing. Not much out there like that.
Load in super high b.c. .338's-.375's. that weigh like 160-250 grains. (Aluminum filled lathed copper). Blackwater makes these in Italy.
Load them long OAL.
Carbon fiber Bull Barrel. 12.5-16".
Go for high velocities. 3200-3400 fps.
Should work.
Come on man...
You're phishing for info...?
No, you're posting worthless, and borderline dangerous info in this thread.
Badlands is doing something that is feasible with their bullets...The same as Lehigh and Cutting Edge
you're posting that a .338 130 grain bullet can have same BC and bullet profile as a .338 250 Berger? What's the SD of this bullet?
An ant's fart would blow that bullet a "mile" off target at 2000 yards
One thing i have to say...it's been seriously entertaining reading your posts.
Let's get this thread back on track...please
Here's a couple of questions for you...Okay I'm not looking for a fight I'm looking for practical advice.
Let's take a .308 inch .399 b.c. 147 gr FMJ @ 2750 fps.
Let's take a .338 inch .682 b.c. 130 gr ATIP @ 3100 fps. Badlands could EASILY develop this bullet.
My idea is 3100 FPS. That's not really dangerous for a .338 RCM is it? 60,000-62,000 psi is normal for .338 RCM.
Surely it has less wind drift at 200, 600, 1200, and 2000 meters then the 147gr M80 ball?
Is this really....dangerous? Seems smart to me.
Less time to target. Less lead time on movers. Lower weight then 147gr Creedmore.
Better on a drop chart.
Far greater terminal affect.
Here's a couple of questions for you...
Are you a fairly young engineer of some sort?...
Or are you a member of the Gravy SEALs, Meal Team Six?
OK… I’ll play along…
Here’s where you are going wrong
The typical AR10 mag has a max COAL of ~ 2.8”
That greatly limits the High BC bullets you want to use in the 338 RCM or 338 WSM
The seating depth of these long high BC bullets, seats the bullets WAY too deep into the case.
Which in turn eats up, or decreases the amount of powder, that you can fit into the case…
So then in turn the less powder the slower the velocity.
The “light” (130 grain) version of the 338 250 Berger you want to produce, will not fit into a 338 RCM/WSM case, while fitting into a AR10/LR308 magazine…
The bearing surface of the longer 250 Berger has to get pushed so far into the case to fit the mag…that the bearing surface no longer even touches the case neck…
The 250 Berger literally falls into the case, when you try to seat it to 2.8” (uh…I’ve tried it)
I’m giving you an A+ for curiousity…(seriously)
But you need to break out the micrometer, and have a little more knowledge of mag length limits, powders and reloading before you venture out into the AR10 world on SH…
That’s easy. Slap a .375 Cheytac bolt action upper on an AR10 lower.
i have a MC-52 in bound... hopefully this weekIf one of these come on the market, you will see Buffalo Winter and I in a cage match over who gets it first...
Sirhr
I am a hobbyist Open Source Intelligence Technician and I develop weapons programs for myself to use in video games to beat others with.
I have had the opportunity to absolutely destroy Police and Military in 3 gun matches back when I was fast and light and they were fat and old.
But now I just game.
1 moa (at 1500 if I remember) was the criteria for the sniper rifle trials back in 2009.Gotcha. I figured that it would not be accurate at 2000-3000 yards.
However; the "concept" is essentially a machine gun round or assualt rifle round. Not a precision rifle round.
If you could get 1 moa or under with 1200m. Great.
1 moa (at 1500 if I remember) was the criteria for the sniper rifle trials back in 2009.
And that was only the vert as they knew wind is skill not just mechanical accuracy.
Thinking that spec in a semi of sorts…good luck
Gotcha. I figured that it would not be accurate at 2000-3000 yards.
However; the "concept" is essentially a machine gun round or assualt rifle round. Not a precision rifle round.
If you could get 1 moa or under with 1200m. Great.
AR 10 platform is NOT suited to an actual machine gun or even light machine gun work.
Trying to make a machine gun into a precision designated marksman rifle role is going to give you something that is substandard at both the machine gun role and the designated marksman role.
In addition to belt fed machine guns in the standard .223, .308, .50 BMG, there were also systems trialed in .338 / .300 NM
For a semi-auto designated marksman rifle to hit out to 1200 yards, an AR-10 in a 6.5CM or similar will do the job without being crazy.
But for any longer stuff or dedicated target stuff, it makes way more sense to have someone with a proper bolt action rifle shooting something bigger than can fit in an AR10 and where the rifle is more likely to be more accurate than a semi-platform can easily achieve at distance / energy.
Military use is usually a team not some crazy lone operator, team members have things needed to cover the likely different variables in the operation.
For an "assault rifle" you need light, compact, effective fire and effective control at closer ranges.
.308 was considered too much weight / recoil for that role, and everybody is trying to find a sweet spot in between .223 and .308 as the new Goldilocks assault rifle.
What you see a lot of in the "cool" things is folks trying different crazy new ideas on how to make an AR-15 or AR-10 platform have a lot more close range knock down or punch through power. None of those are built for extended ranges.
Yes. Well the Dutch SF use HBAR F/A 5.56mm ARs. Works okay. Original AR10 was a select Fire infantry weapon. Not a DMR.
Could you do a F/A Bull Barrel AR10? Probably.
At the end of the day, a 175GMM SR25 is great for 0-600m rapid engagement.
Is it perfect for guys sprinting across alley ways @ 500m? No. 2500-2600 FPS is slow.
That's where MG's come in.
Would a 3200 FPS SR25 be useful? Yes and no.
Need more? Grab .338 Lapua 300gr SMK.
Need more? Grab a 750gr AMAX .50.
Many Billions of combinations for the AR family.
Trying to be respectful here and still address your comments. It appears that you are reading ballistic charts and reloading data but aren't grasping the inherent weakness of the AR10 design for what you are trying to brainstorm. What you can do with a full auto AR15 means nothing when discussing trying to make a full auto AR10. Certainly you could make it run full auto with the correct knowledge and parts but the platform was never DESIGNED for that use, whereas the M16 design was full auto from the start. What military uses ANY form of an AR10 with full auto capabilities? None that I'm aware of - and I'm not an expert so there could be something out there... But the newest greatest NGSW from SIG isn't based on an AR design and the of M60 wasn't either.Yes. Well the Dutch SF use HBAR F/A 5.56mm ARs. Works okay. Original AR10 was a select Fire infantry weapon. Not a DMR.
Could you do a F/A Bull Barrel AR10? Probably.
At the end of the day, a 175GMM SR25 is great for 0-600m rapid engagement.
Is it perfect for guys sprinting across alley ways @ 500m? No. 2500-2600 FPS is slow.
That's where MG's come in.
Would a 3200 FPS SR25 be useful? Yes and no.
Need more? Grab .338 Lapua 300gr SMK.
Need more? Grab a 750gr AMAX .50.
Many Billions of combinations for the AR family.
The main purpose of a Machine gun is to deliver a high volume of projectiles to the aimed area in a short time frame.
Generally heavier, generally belt fed, generally have things like quick change barrels and bipods, usually fired resting on some surface.
Yes many / most "assault rifles" are select fire, you want them to be because if you suddenly find yourself needing to spray as much lead in front of you as possible to save your life, you want that option, in bursts it also increases your hit potential over a single round.
Have you ever fired a standard weight rifle in Full Auto before? The have you ever tried the same thing with a .308 standard rifle like an M14 or HK G3?
Most of the rest of your comments seem to say you your entire frame of reference is video games.
Get out of the house and go do some shooting of the stuff you are specifically thinking about.
You'll probably find real life is completely different than your video games.
Trying to be respectful here and still address your comments. It appears that you are reading ballistic charts and reloading data but aren't grasping the inherent weakness of the AR10 design for what you are trying to brainstorm. What you can do with a full auto AR15 means nothing when discussing trying to make a full auto AR10. Certainly you could make it run full auto with the correct knowledge and parts but the platform was never DESIGNED for that use, whereas the M16 design was full auto from the start. What military uses ANY form of an AR10 with full auto capabilities? None that I'm aware of - and I'm not an expert so there could be something out there... But the newest greatest NGSW from SIG isn't based on an AR design and the of M60 wasn't either.
With the current plethora of AR capable cartridges if it were possible it would have been done by now. I recommend you do some research on the AR10 design and current cartridges/wildcats that exist and this will give you some insight into real world capabilities.
338LM, yes its great but you're not gonna cram any performance into an AR10 package and they do make an upper that goes onto standard AR15 lowers for 50 cal but now your full semi automatic bolt action.
ETA: For what its worth this is cutting edge 375 stuff they are trying to slam into 338 LM rifles.
that should work for you . also easy to spot misses
Incorrect answer my friend.
.375 Bishop necked down & trimmed down and take the shoulders down 1 cm and put in a 130gr ATIP 300 grain Accubond .338 profile. (.720 b.c)
Velocity will be insane. PSI will be low.
Use XS X10 Drum mags for capacity and go full trans @ 2000-3000yards in an 18 inch barrel.
I finally figured it out. After all these days.
[SHOT 2022] New .375 Bishop Short Magnum Cartridge
Bishop Ammunition & Firearms has unveiled another big-bore cartridge created by necking down the .475 BSM. Meet the .375 Bishop Short Magnum.www.thefirearmblog.com
You’re kind of all over the place here…Lots of military and conflicts have seen the Original AR10.
Canadian Airborne used to convert their FALs
to full auto. Brits switched out L1A1 for Argentine Full Auto models in Falklands.
If you are large and in charge you can handle one properly. Especially now with 6.5 Creedmore SR25s.
Better to have select fire then not.
The Ruag Swiss A.P. load in .375 Swiss is awesome. You can take out APC drivers with it and destroy Level 4 vests out past 400m.
Great round. Not as heavy as. 50.