Rifle Scopes Why is everyone bailing on Vortex scopes?

Kawi

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Nov 11, 2018
263
55
Lakeville MN.
It seems like a lot of people are parting with their vortex scopes lately, a lot of brand new ones for several hundreds of dollars under retail. Why the fire sale? I'm still waiting for my new one to be shipped.
 
Its the time of year! With all new gadgets coming out people are prepping their orders. I would also wager that there is quite a few more Razors in peoples hands compared to some of the competitors.
Still an unbelievable value, I've had 2 4.5-27s, I was on elf the lucky ones who got a brand new one for around 1900. My ford one was on elf the first to hit the streets and paid the full retail.
Still an unbelievable value, fear not
 
I think it's mainly that the ERB-7C & HOURS reticles were announced and the MSRP dropped $600... so a few hundo street price.

People are selling the "old" one and hoping to pick up a "new" one. I like the ERB-7B in the AMG a lot and there are a few minor changes that make the -7C worth while.

I saw some amazing deals lately and would not hesitate to go get one.
 
Vortex, along with "all" the rest are "imported" (a few U.S. made optics left). Asia is the sole supplier of glass, namely China; even for the Germans. All pay for the name but all the components are basically the same. The coatings on the glass are what any pay for as this is where the costs lie. Vortex is overpriced , not offering anything any other name brand has already implemented. Leupold was not born yesterday.


Vortex AMG's glass is US made I believe. Vortex like em or hate em they have driven change in the industry.
 
I ran a vortex razor for a bit. Good glass for the money, like others have said there are a ton out there. So obviously more on the used market.

I’d disagree about them being overpriced. Have you seen the msrp’s on kahles and NF? That’s a lot of loot. I love my ATACR, but I have an older NXS that I may swap out for an AMG or razor
 
They're all the same, "only the 'coatings' on the glass differentiate the clarity. This is a continual game with all the manufacturers. The alleged new type of coatings are ancient history. The cost factor is what hinders the majority of scope makers to provide 'run of the mill glass' which is still excellent. This is nothing new. I'm unaware of the AMG and not really versed with the Vortex line and really could care less. If people actually believe all the hype, I truly feel sorry for them. The price of 6061 is the same for everyone, the price for glass is the same for everyone, the internal components are the same for everyone: "Except the coatings on the glass".
Curious what you think is the best scope for the money
 
There are a lot of reason out there to like Vortex... VIP Warranty, Value, Innovation & Listening to shooters.

I have both a Bushy Elite XRS and Vortex Razor... the razor is better in every way to me: Better reticle, Better Zero Stop, Better clicks, Better Glass, Better Eyebox, and Better Warranty. I know bushy changed their policy lately to try to keep up with vortex.

The XRS had very bad CA which made milling white targets on dark background very difficult. It got dark at the top end and the eye box was very unforgiving, there was no illuminations or warranty on mine. The turrets were way tall and marks didn't line up.

About the only thing I like was the colour but the weird brown has grown on me over the years.
 
Not going to pretend to know the costs of raw components in building quality scopes, but mechanics/design matter in regards to repeatability. as well as tolerances. Let’s not pretend that there aren’t companies that have issues in these areas. It’s not as simple as the costs of raw materials.

Vortex stands behind their products, design, and mechanics with one of the better warranties out there, especially warranties on scopes that are in a 2nd or 3rd owners hands.
 
They're all the same, "only the 'coatings' on the glass differentiate the clarity. This is a continual game with all the manufacturers. The alleged new type of coatings are ancient history. The cost factor is what hinders the majority of scope makers to provide 'run of the mill glass' which is still excellent. This is nothing new. I'm unaware of the AMG and not really versed with the Vortex line and really could care less. If people actually believe all the hype, I truly feel sorry for them. The price of 6061 is the same for everyone, the price for glass is the same for everyone, the internal components are the same for everyone: "Except the coatings on the glass".

Wait, what?!? You think the cost of raw metal is what determines scope pricing? And that the only difference in glass is the coating?

I saw a thread on here about stupidest things you’ve been told.

You my friend... are a contender ?

If what you said is true, go ahead and build me one of those fancy Leupolds you are bragging about. Should cost you around $50 for the materials, lol
 
I'm happy with (and keeping) my Vortex Viper HST.

Perhaps the reason you see a lot of them on the secondary market is the same reason you see a lot of Glocks on the secondary market. There are simply a lot of them out there. But, it's not because Glocks aren't good or popular. :)
 
I love Vortex and have bought a lot of their stuff. That said my new Athlon is better and cheaper for what I do...To get the reticle I want and magnification I want out of Vortex I gotta spend $1400. I get 80% of that for $400 or $1000 less than a similar Vortex scope.

It's not easy sorting thru all the options. I love Vortex but there are some viable options at less money.

VooDoo
 
Wait, what?!? You think the cost of raw metal is what determines scope pricing? And that the only difference in glass is the coating?

I saw a thread on here about stupidest things you’ve been told.

You my friend... are a contender ?

If what you said is true, go ahead and build me one of those fancy Leupolds you are bragging about. Should cost you around $50 for the materials, lol

I think he needs a Quigley Ford up as to his Leopold collection.

You are right on the rest of it. Pretty much everything he said about scopes in this thread is simply false.

Ilya
 
All glass comes from China huh.....

1A4E9083-4C18-450E-B240-DAD324CC1308.gif
 
They're all the same, "only the 'coatings' on the glass differentiate the clarity. This is a continual game with all the manufacturers. The alleged new type of coatings are ancient history. The cost factor is what hinders the majority of scope makers to provide 'run of the mill glass' which is still excellent. This is nothing new. I'm unaware of the AMG and not really versed with the Vortex line and really could care less. If people actually believe all the hype, I truly feel sorry for them. The price of 6061 is the same for everyone, the price for glass is the same for everyone, the internal components are the same for everyone: "Except the coatings on the glass".

This seems like it may be a case of "you don't know what you don't know."
 
Wait, wait, wait... the guy who shows up talking about how Vortex is overpriced is touting *Leupold* as his go-to? Aaaaaaahhhhhahahahahahahahaha

If all you want is a 3-9 with a simple duplex reticle, then sure... Leupold has some decent options. However, if you're wanting first focal plane, a Christmas tree reticle of some sort, illumination, tactical-style controls, and, I dunno, actual mechanically accurate tracking, Leupold is one of the most overpriced manufacturers in the market. They've been living off of their reputation for YEARS. As I understand it, they've finally woken up a bit and are going to start offering some competitive product for this segment of the market, but they've got a LOT of catching up to do... which is damned sad, considering that it didn't have to be this way.
 
Synoptic 12

New Hide Member
Joined Yesterday at 4:16 PM



- Trolling with total absolutes within your first day: Check
- Bible verse in sig: Check
- Making totally retarded statements: Check
- Types in bold lettering: Check

lol there's no way you're 'new'; just trying to figure out if you're going to give me a 'hint' or not

I pretty much came here to say this. :LOL:

Welcome, Synoptic 12! The flame that burns twice as bright burns half as long, so... make it count! :ROFLMAO:
 
I'll match anyone with my Leupold or Elite at 700 to 800 meters, even if they have March optics.

700-800 meters? Really? That is so yesterday... have you been under a rock for the last five years?

The bolt crowd are all dead and the remainder have delusions of grandeur.

I love delusions. That’s what life is really all about anyway, right?

Synoptic 12

New Hide Member
Joined Yesterday at 4:16 PM



- Trolling with total absolutes within your first day: Check
- Bible verse in sig: Check
- Making totally retarded statements: Check
- Types in bold lettering: Check

lol there's no way you're 'new'; just trying to figure out if you're going to give me a 'hint' or not
Larry? Is that you? It’s been a while. As always, you make me laugh.
 
They're all the same, "only the 'coatings' on the glass differentiate the clarity. This is a continual game with all the manufacturers. The alleged new type of coatings are ancient history. The cost factor is what hinders the majority of scope makers to provide 'run of the mill glass' which is still excellent. This is nothing new. I'm unaware of the AMG and not really versed with the Vortex line and really could care less. If people actually believe all the hype, I truly feel sorry for them. The price of 6061 is the same for everyone, the price for glass is the same for everyone, the internal components are the same for everyone: "Except the coatings on the glass".

Why should we believe a single word you have said?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1J04
I'm a new guy here also, just trying to learn a whole bunch as quickly as possible. Just starting out, pulled up this thread to see how big of a mistake I made just buying a Vortex PST Gen 2 3-15x44 FFP to put on my 6.5.

Haven't had a chance to compare it to any other scopes as of yet, but so far so good. It is better than my Gen 1 FFP Vortex scopes so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LakuNoc
I'm a new guy here also, just trying to learn a whole bunch as quickly as possible. Just starting out, pulled up this thread to see how big of a mistake I made just buying a Vortex PST Gen 2 3-15x44 FFP to put on my 6.5.

Haven't had a chance to compare it to any other scopes as of yet, but so far so good. It is better than my Gen 1 FFP Vortex scopes so far.

You bought a great scope, dude. Rock it.