Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestSo, that gives you in the neighborhood of 4 moa (approximately at 100) in the sight itself bc those old clicks arent perfect. So.......
With a tall target.... shoot the gun. As sighted in now. But, count the moa down to the stop and see how many minutes you are playing with and need on the mount height, to get your desired setting on the sight for the stop.
Run the sight to the bottom and shoot it on the tall target and see what u playin with on the needed moa.
You may end up with the lowest mount and the lowest lyman front to get as close as you can.
My 56 had this same issue. Still not where I can do pics.
Best to you brother.
It's okay...he was behind the lines
|
|
Very gently shorten the screws, do not buy cheap ass screws. Take off a half thread n try it... repeat.
Chuck screw head in drill. Turn screw on sandpaper until u got the length you need....
It's old school and how we used to do it...
I'd like to see that Model 70!Didn't get around to playing with the base screws.....too busy messing with my new to me 1967 Coleman lantern, buying that shit on EBay kicks ass.
Did make it by the Honey Hole today.....kept away from the rack of Model 70s so I wouldn't be tempted to buy that 1941 .300 Win Mag Standard......friggen beautiful rifle....told its about 20 SN away from a legit USMC gun.
I did get this though....
View attachment 7575203
View attachment 7575205
View attachment 7575207
Smells like decades ago. $10 not bad inflation wise.
I'd like to see that Model 70!
DW
Just as well, if he wanted a 300 win mag. If the 1941 model 70 barrel is factory and marked 300 Magnum it is chambered in 300 H&H not 300 win mag. 300 win mag was not introduced until 1963.
Good to know. I had wondered about that. My bad.
The Honey Hole had a Pre 64 standard stock but I think he was asking stupid money for it....plus $500 if I recall.
Ill try and get by to check it out and see if he has a "best price".
I have one built by TBA that I just got my 15x Varmint Unertl mounted on. Thinking I might go with a lower power
I have a two stocks in the shop from the original 373 USMC rifles. One is a marksman stock that has already sold and is going into a sniper build we are working on now. The other is a Low comb sporter stock with heavy original patina. A rack number is stenciled on the butt, some various stamps randomly scattered on the exterior of the stock, and the serial number stamped in the barrel channel. This latter stock also has a very large toe crack which has been repaired in our shop. It is by far the cooler of the two stocks, but may be too rough for most to be interested. Photos of both are below, with a couple additional photos of the sporter stock. At the bottom is a WWII era photo showing both styles of rifles being used side by side in training.@pre64win
I'm hunting a prewar stock to clone Phil's clone.
I have a two stocks in the shop from the original 373 USMC rifles. One is a marksman stock that has already sold and is going into a sniper build we are working on now. The other is a Low comb sporter stock with heavy original patina. A rack number is stenciled on the butt, some various stamps randomly scattered on the exterior of the stock, and the serial number stamped in the barrel channel. This latter stock also has a very large toe crack which has been repaired in our shop. It is by far the cooler of the two stocks, but may be too rough for most to be interested. Photos of both are below, with a couple additional photos of the sporter stock. At the bottom is a WWII era photo showing both styles of rifles being used side by side in training.
If you were not thinking of going with something this authentic, we have plenty of other options for you. Just let me know the details (pre-war tang & low comb, or something different?)
View attachment 7575580
View attachment 7575583
View attachment 7575584
View attachment 7575585
Thanks Phil!Slight correction.....that last photo is the Vietnam USMC sniper school....
I have a two stocks in the shop from the original 373 USMC rifles. One is a marksman stock that has already sold and is going into a sniper build we are working on now. The other is a Low comb sporter stock with heavy original patina. A rack number is stenciled on the butt, some various stamps randomly scattered on the exterior of the stock, and the serial number stamped in the barrel channel. This latter stock also has a very large toe crack which has been repaired in our shop. It is by far the cooler of the two stocks, but may be too rough for most to be interested. Photos of both are below, with a couple additional photos of the sporter stock. At the bottom is a WWII era photo showing both styles of rifles being used side by side in training.
If you were not thinking of going with something this authentic, we have plenty of other options for you. Just let me know the details (pre-war tang & low comb, or something different?)
View attachment 7575580
View attachment 7575583
View attachment 7575584
View attachment 7575585
If the sporter stock has enough meat to open the barrel channel to a Win target taper or a 6 Douglas, I would be more than ok with it.
It's going to be a user rifle. The prewar action I'm going to use will be getting barrel #5 in its lifetime for this iteration (its it's currently a 6mm Rem in an oil finish marksman stock). I like the narrow stock sniper version better for what I'm doing with them these days. Phil's rifle signature/silhouette just called and said, do this.... bc somewhere in my checkered past I used one like that... nostalgia bites again.
I looked last night at a McMillan GP in marble walnut, and almost ordered it.
I might be better speaking with u on phone.
My Sporter accepted the Douglas I used which is a bit beefier than Win Target......there is some variance in Win stocks though.
My barrel is a Douglas #7....
View attachment 7575877
It looks good, Phil. Pretty clean. Not sure if the Lyman was lower than the Winchester, but I sort of agree that the Winchester has a better more utility look to it. Good luck finding inserts for it, however. I assume that is why you went with the Lyman? Anyhow, let us know what that did for the aperture arm on your receiver sight. Close to getting it back where it belongs?I think it's as low as can be.
I had to hone the bottom of the site to fit.
It looks good, Phil. Pretty clean. Not sure if the Lyman was lower than the Winchester, but I sort of agree that the Winchester has a better more utility look to it. Good luck finding inserts for it, however. I assume that is why you went with the Lyman? Anyhow, let us know what that did for the aperture arm on your receiver sight. Close to getting it back where it belongs?
The 1942 rifles had a dovetail and needed a dovetail type block. The Van Orden rifles had D&T holes for a screwed-on front block.let me ask this, and this is not to stir the pot any, but just for my information.
Did the actual USMC Sniper m70s like Hathcock used have a front sight mounting block or dovetailed to drift in a sight after the Douglas barrels were installed? Did they come like that from Van Orden?
Van Orden rifles used factory target barrels. There were no cataloged target rifles made between 1951 and 1954, so a VO made in this period could conceivably have a barrel with a dovetail. Those made from 1955 onward are all made with D&T holes and no dovetail.I have a Van Orden with original Winchester barrel and dovetailed front sight block....
It’s 1955, but I wouldn’t dispute the originality of a dovetail even this late. Winchester was notoriously scattered in their cutoff points when they transitioned changes into production. The bottom of the barrel will be dated for the barrel date of manufacture. It’s conceivable Winchester sent some “clean-up” barrel inventory to Evaluators. Target rifles in the non-cataloged years of 1952-1954 have barrels both ways. I have VO SN 335339 (also 1955), a “US PROPERTY” gun, and it has a 55 dated barrel with D&T holes, which is what we’d expect to see.Mine is serial 338300, which I believe dates to 1953?
This is on my bucket list of rifles... after I recoup from my Tacops, I’ll be searching for a donor rifleI went with the Winchester Target profile barrel and dovetailed front sight block on my USMC clone... my next rifle will be the heavy Douglas barrel like @pmclaine has.
View attachment 7579257
This is on my bucket list of rifles... after I recoup from my Tacops, I’ll be searching for a donor rifle
I'm seriously tempted by this rifle...
I'm seriously tempted by this rifle...
DW