Would you get into 6.5 Grendel in 2024?

I’ve been shooting a 12.5” Grendel for 6 years now as a lightweight hunting rifle. I wanted to see what an 18” would do so I threw this one together with some parts I had laying around.

Everything Geissele minus JP barrel and bolt. Shot with factory Barnes 110. Group is rounds 11-15 through the gun. The OCL infinity with vented cap is great on this rifle, quiet and kept the gun clean.

View attachment 8657591View attachment 8657592View attachment 8657593
Can you clarify the ammo? Barnes doesn't list 110 6.5G factory ammo.
 
I got into 6.5 Grendel with a CZ 527 bolt-action rifle for deer hunting. No regrets. Whether it is better or the more recently introduced 6 ARC, I couldn't say, but the 527 was never chambered in 6. Either would work in an AR-15, but they both perform much better with a longer barrel than most people prefer on an AR.

AR's also bring a lot of other potential criteria into the mix. Heavier projectiles are going to have a better terminal effect, but if the bulk and weight of a full loadout is a factor, then the trajectory of the bullets is going to arc more because larger cases to hold the powder for higher velocities would reduce magazine capacity and therefore increase magazine count and overall weight. If you're hunting and you only need about five cartridges, it doesn't matter.

300 BLK is the worst of both worlds. It's too small and light for subsonic, being beat even by 45 ACP. It's too heavy and with insufficient powder capacity for supersonic. Grendel is certainly a better choice for supersonic. For subsonic, we need some more innovation. 300 BLK works well because it uses the 5.56x45 case, magazines, etc., but like I wrote, it's too small and light to slow it down. The 45 is better, but it may lack the pressure to operate a gas action. Pistol cartridge carbines typically use blowback actions that don't just blow, they suck. Suppressed AR's need a large caliber cartridge that generates a lot of gas pressure. I don't like how the straightwall options headspace off the case mouth, so maybe 458 socom or 9x39.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bakwa and pangris
I regret to say I concur the 300 BLK only beats the Grendel in reliability.

Under 100 yards, the 300 BLK is o-tay but if I could go back in time and talk to myself, I'd say DON'T DO IT unless you're doing apartment building style CQB.
 
SwissP Defense and GIGN Present 6.5 Grendel for Beretta NARP

swissp-defence-and-gign-present-the-6-5-grendel-for-beretta-narp.jpg


The French Special Forces unit GIGN and Swiss ammunition manufacturer SwissP Defence have signed an agreement to jointly develop new 6.5 Grendel cartridges. The rounds are intended to meet GIGN’s operational needs and will be offered in three variants: FMJ, Styx Action, and Target. As you may notice, the Beretta NARP is shown above, chambered in 6.5 Grendel.

The rounds have the following characteristics: FMJ - for reliable training and operations. Styx Action - with controlled deformation for tactical applications. Target - for maximum accuracy at long ranges.
 
Yeah, even in 2025….


IMG_6846.jpeg
IMG_6845.jpeg

First groups from a new 18” Grendel build.
Seekins upper, lower, hg
Proof 18” Stainless 6.5 Grendel barrel
Toolcraft DLC bcg
Colt lpk
Standard carbine RE w/H buffer
Magpul STR with Subrevtech bag rider
Flat Larue MBT trigger
NX8 4-32 Mil-XT in a cheap Warne X-Skel mount
Surefire 3 Prong FH
Castle nut is staked at 12 o’clock.

Groups were shot at 100 yards across the bedcover of my truck on a Harris with a rear squeeze bag. Forgot my chrono. Hornady Black 123ELD’s and 100ELD-VT ammo used.
The 2 groups on top of one another were shot suppressed. The 100gr ammo short stroked without the suppressor but locked back on empty suppressed. 123’s ran like a champ with and without the can.

I got sloppy and shanked shot 3 in the top left pic but oh well, I counted it in the group.
Lone shot in center pic was the first fired after a quick bore sight.