Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
anything over 30-32mm tube is a no-go. ACOG doesn't work well.So what is wrong with just using the Burris mount. Doesn't it align and work fine with traditional 1-6 lpvos, which I thought was the preferred magnificent range anyways? Is it solely the larger 56mm optics that's the issue?
I'm still waiting to see a version for sale, that has a bubble-level mounted on the side of the slide.
You really need to get behind the 5-42 Gen 2 with my reticle in it!! The 4.5-28 does have a tighter eyebox but the new 5-42x is a fantastic optic some should be coming to the wild here shortly. As for parallax I basically don’t touch it all day during a match. The glass in the 5-42 Gen 2 is also really really damn good. We’ve compared it side by side with the theta and zcos and many guys have said the march is actually better glass. I’ve had actual users of zcos and Thetas come look and actually go that’s actually better than my scope is.That guy's a major fucking tool, I'd take anything he says or "Tests" with a huge grain of salt.
He claims to be an expert but I'd bet my bottom dollar he'd get his ass kicked in a PRS match by any random selection of dudes on this forum!
I bought a 4.5-28 when they first came out and I've put it through the ringer over the past 4 years.
It tracks true, verified to 1940 yards on my 300NMI, holds zero, and has really solid glass. Optically I'd put it between my 7-35 ATACR and ZCO 527, with a massive win in FOV.
The only disadvantage it has as a competition optic is the eye box isn't very forgiving, same with the parallax.
Not terrible, but definitely not as good as the 7-35 ATACR.
Words...mean things. Keeping it real, Brother!Sorry, but if the option of making the beast with two backs with a hot ATF Chick is not part of the deal.... then it's not a honeypot.
It's a sting.
Just want to make sure you know that a honey trap involves the possibility banging hot sketchy chicks with major career aspirations and no morals.
Sirhr
PS. You don't want to know what a mudpot is... But Barney Frank would be able to explain.
Hey, if you can't make it in professional sports you might as will be a professional killer. At least you be good at sumpin yo.
Login to view embedded media
Um, you'll have to educate me on this one. I was an early adopter of the LR, and I used it until the Garmin came out, at which time I became an early adopter of it and never have used the LR since. But I never found the ability of the LR to add to add to a previously closed session? To my knowledge, you can't do that.The Labradar was a clunky system that was finicky and difficult to use that allowed itself to become outdated but even it had the option to pull up an old string and add to it.
If you're still curious as to why it would be useful it would make it much simpler to keep track of your shots. If you're switching rifles/ammo types ten times at the range you would have twenty strings to combine. If they were similar speeds you would have to keep paper notes to remember which strings were for which rifle/ammo. Having String 1: Rifle 1, String 2: Rifle 2 would be much easier in my opinion (and a lot of other people's opinions too it seems.)
And like you I also submitted feedback on their website. I didn't even get a response.