What I was really hoping for was a directing comment on resolution of the LHT vs the T6Xi, your individual reviews. You list the LHT at 18x having 38-44 lp/mm while the Stiener is 33-34 lp/mm and the S&B at 34-35 lp/mm. I have a hard time believing that the LHT is out doing the S&B so Im wondering whats actually going on there, be it different test days, eyes feeling different, or a different test method?
On newer reviews I have a disclaimer to not compare resolution tests from different days, absolutely a different day and different time of day can have an effect on the number of lines I can see, I have seen variation of up to 10lpi with the same scope at same distance just on different days. I never had the LHT 4.5-22 side by side with the US 3-20 so difficult to say what they would do.
It might be a mute point as the more I have looked the more I suspect the LHT is not for me between FOV, Turrets, ilm controls. Of course, if it will help me spot 5.56 impacts at 800, cut through glare, let me see low contrast targets at long range, then I might get over all that.
Sounds like you've made a good decision based on your needs, the LHT was designed to be light - first and foremost, but it also means it has some compromises, some are willing to accept those compromises to get the weight reduction while others are not, there is no right or wrong answer here.
Might be an overstatement, Im sure Id have no issues with TT turrets, but generally speaking, due to where my rifle rides, locking is pretty important to me. Though it hasnt caused me to write off the 4-20 ATACR yet.
ATACR turrets in general are really nice. But is the 20x worth it over the locking turret of the 4-16?
Reticle/Cost on both the 5-20 and 3-20 is what ruled it out, I doubt Id like the GR2ID and compared to the March and ATACR glass is close but both are cheaper/lighter/equally ergonomic.
Schmidt's are at stupid prices right now, history has proved they do this for a while and then bring prices back down (I assume once their sales falloff considerably), there is too much competition and good optics to choose from to pay the current Schmidt USA pricing.
I think I was focusing on the 8x and 10x erector Marchs and Ive put the march back on the list
The 8x March like the 3-24x52 is an excellent 3-18 scope and a really good 3-20 scope, above 20x and that image starts to really struggle. The 10x March like the 1.5-15x42 is outstanding to 10x, very good to 12x and pretty good to 15x when it comes to IQ, but you get the lighter weight and the extreme mag range along with an excellent DFP reticle, the scope is not for everyone but I think it is one of the best MPVO designs we have right now, especially if you want/need a little greater range than say a 2-10 for example...
I actually called CS before I posted this base off another on of your posts, they told me just go through NF, mil discount is lower then retail cost.
Really, I guess NF has hunkered down on dealers giving good deals
Your the best man, you ask the right question and make the right observations forcing a guy to think. It is certainly time for an upgrade. I was shooting this weekend and my first shot was a foot over the target, I had zeroed the PST turrets but they had spun nearly a full revolution riding around in the truck over the week. Then at 400 yards at a 5"x7" white and gray target at a high angle in a shadow in the snow and sagebrush, with sun hitting my lens in a bad way... it was all I could do to find it and Im the one who put it there. No issue hitting hit once found but my gosh that was a perfect storm where Im sure better glass wouldve made all the difference.
This is definitely where better glass is going to help.
After reading your high mag alpha glass review today Im half tempted to buy a G3 Razor for my PRS gun and put my 5-25 PMII on my gas gun. Of course now I have a 3LB optic stack once I add a mount and T2... which again is so close to the stiener it turns me off to that deal too.
But is the ATACR worth 700-1k more to save 5oz?
I assume that was rhetorical, as only you can really answer that question.
Is the March 1.5-15 dfp shuriken worth another 1k to save another 5 oz and deal with the poor eye box and less then alpha glass for 3k? I dont think so. Then is the 4.5-28 worth close to double the cost over the ATACR at the same weight? Probs not for me as I dont need the upper mag range and 16x on an ATACR would be good enough.
Again, only you can answer this, but it is hard to answer without seeing them side by side. Hopefully my review of the March with the ATACR 4-16 helps. For me personally, the benefits of the March mag range and reticle outweighed the better optical performance of the ATACR. I am doing an "Update" review on the March 1.5-15 soon and doing a comparison with the RG3 1-10 to give people another metric to look at...