Hey, vaccinated

Bender

Alphabeti Notice: This is a satire account
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Feb 12, 2014
    13,332
    47,900
    Cheyenne WY.
    8BB387CB-FE47-432E-8D05-BA503A6D7EF7.jpeg
     
    .05% effective , and masks are even less effective at stopping the spread yea .

    The claim: "N95 masks block few, if any" COVID-19 particles due to their size​

    As many states and communities ease restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the debate over mask usage has intensified.

    Businesses, churches and governments have implemented all manner of policies — some requiring masks, some leaving it up to each person, some even banning masks. And that has spurred many armchair epidemiologists to weigh in, including a Facebook page with nearly 1 million followers.

    A June 4 post from Why don’t you try this? went a step beyond the homemade mask debate to claim that even the N95 masks used by health care workers are pointless in the face of COVID-19.

    “COVID 19 virus particle size is 125 nanometers (0.125 microns); the range is 0.06 microns to .14 microns,” the post said. “The N95 mask filters down to 0.3 microns. So, N95 masks block few, if any, virions (virus particles).”

    In other words, the post asserts the virus is smaller than the filter on the N95 mask, so the N95 mask doesn’t work. and that was only one medical review there are 100 more online another of them gave specific numbers to how poorly the normal persons mask (non medicaln-95) did and it's even worse. but if you feel better wearing one and it makes you feel safe then do so by all means . so the .05% might be a stretch but so is masks save lives from infections .
     
    Last edited:
    Is this just your general trolling or did I miss something in the news about the vax and the HIV?
    I got bored. And I remember the sanctimonious vax tards and how they threatened my job, my family, my life all because of their clot-shot gods that sold them all for a bag of silver. I will never forget how they treated others.
     
    I got bored. And I remember the sanctimonious vax tards and how they threatened my job, my family, my life all because of their clot-shot gods that sold them all for a bag of silver. I will never forget how they treated others.
    There's a shit ton of places I will NEVER go again, and an even bigger group of people and things I'll NEVER forgive for what they did with their horseshit vax / experiment mandates. Even the places who removed the requirements can go fuck off. They never should've had them in the first place.
     
    I got bored. And I remember the sanctimonious vax tards and how they threatened my job, my family, my life all because of their clot-shot gods that sold them all for a bag of silver. I will never forget how they treated others.
    Vaxholes, we call them vaxholes. Troll on you plausibly heterosexual robot. 😍
     
    You really are a dumb fucking liar .
    Hey, I thought you was all against trolling since you made a big public display of reporting me? A moron and hypocrite, what a surprise. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

    He is incorrect since the efficacy is 0%, considering they said it would stop you from catching and spreading, Then it turned out people who took the clot shot are actually contagious for longer. Then they said it was never meant to stop you from catching and spreading. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

    I was going to post an article where they explained that 66% efficacy didn't mean 34 out of 100 people would not get the virus, it meant you had 66% less chance of catching it. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: IT easy to fool morons.

    How many years behind are you?
     
    Last edited:
    Hey, I thought you was all against trolling since you made a big public display of reporting me? A moron and hypocrite, what a surprise. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

    He is incorrect since the efficacy is 0%, considering they said it would stop you from catching and spreading, Then it turned out people who took the clot shot are actually contagious for longer. Then they said it was never meant to stop you from catching and spreading. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

    I was going to post an article where they explained that 66% efficacy didn't mean 34 out of 100 people would not get the virus, it meant you had 66% less chance of catching it. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: IT easy to fool morons.

    How many years behind are you?

    Haney likes to "spread" and "catch"
     
    Hey, I thought you was all against trolling since you made a big public display of reporting me? A moron and hypocrite, what a surprise. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

    He is incorrect since the efficacy is 0%, considering they said it would stop you from catching and spreading, Then it turned out people who took the clot shot are actually contagious for longer. Then they said it was never meant to stop you from catching and spreading. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

    I was going to post an article where they explained that 66% efficacy didn't mean 34 out of 100 people would not get the virus, it meant you had 66% less chance of catching it. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: IT easy to fool morons.

    How many years behind are you?
    They literally changed the definition of the word vaccine because of this.
     
    .05% effective , and masks are even less effective at stopping the spread yea .

    The claim: "N95 masks block few, if any" COVID-19 particles due to their size​

    As many states and communities ease restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the debate over mask usage has intensified.

    Businesses, churches and governments have implemented all manner of policies — some requiring masks, some leaving it up to each person, some even banning masks. And that has spurred many armchair epidemiologists to weigh in, including a Facebook page with nearly 1 million followers.

    A June 4 post from Why don’t you try this? went a step beyond the homemade mask debate to claim that even the N95 masks used by health care workers are pointless in the face of COVID-19.

    “COVID 19 virus particle size is 125 nanometers (0.125 microns); the range is 0.06 microns to .14 microns,” the post said. “The N95 mask filters down to 0.3 microns. So, N95 masks block few, if any, virions (virus particles).”

    In other words, the post asserts the virus is smaller than the filter on the N95 mask, so the N95 mask doesn’t work. and that was only one medical review there are 100 more online another of them gave specific numbers to how poorly the normal persons mask (non medicaln-95) did and it's even worse. but if you feel better wearing one and it makes you feel safe then do so by all means . so the .05% might be a stretch but so is masks save lives from infections .
    Haha...
    I wore a mask yesterday (hey, I have to use them somehow) to spread a bunch of insect poison around the house perimeter. Every once in a while I'd get a whiff of something. All the while saying to myself...these masks (not an N95 btw) MAY filter out big sneezes but ain't filtering out even this insect stuff as good as I'd wished, let alone a VIRUS that is itself probably close to 1 million times smaller. I never bought into the mask - as soon as we knew it was a virus that was less than 0.3 microns anybody thinking it'd prevent illness was turning a blind eye on MATH and PHYSICS.
     
    I remember one time when I was in the 3-5 year old range. I was not supposed to get my shorts wet, so I put another pair of shorts on, on top of them before getting in the water to keep them dry. On that day I surpassed the intellect of the general mask wearing public.

    We literally learned in history class in school, masking during the 1920 flu pandemic did not work because the virus was too small. The analogy used was mosquitos through a chain link fence.
     
    Last edited:
    Haha...
    I wore a mask yesterday (hey, I have to use them somehow) to spread a bunch of insect poison around the house perimeter. Every once in a while I'd get a whiff of something. All the while saying to myself...these masks (not an N95 btw) MAY filter out big sneezes but ain't filtering out even this insect stuff as good as I'd wished, let alone a VIRUS that is itself probably close to 1 million times smaller. I never bought into the mask - as soon as we knew it was a virus that was less than 0.3 microns anybody thinking it'd prevent illness was turning a blind eye on MATH and PHYSICS.
    Probably about twenty percent of the population around here are wearing masks and the vast majority of them have them hanging on their chin. :rolleyes:
     
    I recall listening to Doctors Peter McCullough, Pierre Korey, Ryan Cole all interviewed by Steve Deace in the summer of 2020 discussing the first strain of this virus SARS COVID-1 from 2002-2003.

    First, they all stated that there was NEVER a vaccine successfully developed for SARS COVID-1 after years of drug companies conducting multiple trials.

    "There Was No Vaccine For Sars Or Mers. Will There Be One For The New Coronavirus?" - Josephine Ma and Simone McCarthy​

    • South China Morning Post
    • New York, NY

    • (February 22, 2020)
    “Seventeen years after the severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) outbreak and seven years since the first Middle East respiratory syndrome (Mers) case, there is still no coronavirus vaccine despite dozens of attempts to develop them. “Everybody is hoping that this can still be controlled, but the realistic chance that it can be controlled is low. So then what is going to happen is that this is going to spread worldwide,” said Florian Krammer, PhD, professor of microbiology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

    — Florian Krammer, PhD, Professor, Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai”

    The drug companies finally gave up on developing this vaccine due to:

    ”Conclusions
    These SARS-CoV vaccines all induced antibody and protection against infection with SARS-CoV. However, challenge of mice given any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.”

    So one concern of producing a viable SARS COVOD-1 vaccine was “Th2-type immunopathology” better known as Cytokine storm. The MRNA SARS COVID-2 vaccine has been blamed for contributing to “Th2-type immunopathology” so similar problems with this new vaccine wreaking havic on the bodies immune system.


    Second, SARS COVID-1 just burned itself out in late 2003 and was gone without drastic measures here in the US such as masks, lockdowns, and unproven vaccines administered to the general population.

    Once all these doctors explained the history of the SARS COVID-1 and the MIC (Medical Industrial Complex) was never able to come up with a viable vaccine after years of research but now Pfizer/Bio-Ntech has created a SARS COVID-2 vaccine in less than a year with no long term safety/efficacy trials plus given full legal/financial immunity from .gov for vaccine injuries/death?

    No way I’m taking this poison it’s unproven.
     
    Last edited:
    Haha...
    I wore a mask yesterday (hey, I have to use them somehow) to spread a bunch of insect poison around the house perimeter. Every once in a while I'd get a whiff of something. All the while saying to myself...these masks (not an N95 btw) MAY filter out big sneezes but ain't filtering out even this insect stuff as good as I'd wished, let alone a VIRUS that is itself probably close to 1 million times smaller. I never bought into the mask - as soon as we knew it was a virus that was less than 0.3 microns anybody thinking it'd prevent illness was turning a blind eye on MATH and PHYSICS.
    A n95 will not filter out those chemicals either. Large droplets sure, but you will absolutely smell it.


    I learned about masks when I wore a mold mask that was 10 micron, sprayed zinzer binz in a house where it had a fire. I could smell it, all too well, minutes later I spun around and passed out. This was not your typical face mask, it was a 300 dollar replaceable filter and I had no facial hair. Nothing we were told to do regarding face masks was accurate or helped anything other than weak minded people feel better about going into public.
     
    A n95 will not filter out those chemicals either. Large droplets sure, but you will absolutely smell it.


    I learned about masks when I wore a mold mask that was 10 micron, sprayed zinzer binz in a house where it had a fire. I could smell it, all too well, minutes later I spun around and passed out. This was not your typical face mask, it was a 300 dollar replaceable filter and I had no facial hair. Nothing we were told to do regarding face masks was accurate or helped anything other than weak minded people feel better about going into public.
    The quickest way to fix all of this is to tell the pro-mask folks that the masks will filter out carbon monoxide because CO is bigger than O.
     
    Last edited:
    A n95 will not filter out those chemicals either. Large droplets sure, but you will absolutely smell it.


    I learned about masks when I wore a mold mask that was 10 micron, sprayed zinzer binz in a house where it had a fire. I could smell it, all too well, minutes later I spun around and passed out. This was not your typical face mask, it was a 300 dollar replaceable filter and I had no facial hair. Nothing we were told to do regarding face masks was accurate or helped anything other than weak minded people feel better about going into public.
    These were actually amdro crystals. Mainly I was trying to filter out the bottom of the barrel powder. It MAY have done that, MAY.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Jgunner