300 yard consistency

I understand that CCI is considered shit around these parts. I have no dog in the fight regarding ammo as I haven't tried every type listed in this thread. Match grade LR ammo has been tough to purchase reliably since I got into this game. Im sure a lot of you guys buy rounds by the case however, Im not the type to sit on a case of ammo that doesnt shoot well with any firearm. I would love to test SLR but struggle to find it in stock. Eley is the only one that I havent tried on your list and plan to make a purchse tonight.

There has to be some middle ground where you dont need sit by a computer waiting for stock to be replenished. Maybe sending the rifle off for lot testting would be better use of money so I can buy 5k rounds of whatever shoots the best but I think the distances of those factory test are limited to 100yds.

I have seen evidence of faster twist rates and longer barrel lenghts normilizing midtire ammo, allowing the user to shoot sub 2MOA reliably out to 300yds in ideal conditions. My rifle has yet to do this with the ammo I have tested and Im not sure it ever will regardless of the ammo selection. I am learning in this proccess and I feel it neccessary to question if 20" barrel lenthg at 1:16tw is optimal as I see multiple front of pack shooters running a different setup.

I know top rimfire smiths are cranking out some quality gear these days but I want to know the WHY they choose X vs Y. This can be taken further with reamer selection but thats a whole different can of worms.

I appreciate everyones feedback and will try each logical suggestion. I have some homework and testing to do. I have already used ammo seek as well as shooting bot to source some Eley. Will update with results when ammo comes in.

~Jay
The experience of myself and more than a handful of high volume long range Rimfire shooters is that aside from bench rest with wind flags, ammo cost is directly related to consistency. (BR shooters using tuners do some great shooting). You get what you pay for ammo wise. Center-X is hard to find because people are cheap, but dream of some incredible performance at a bargain price. The other untruth that is prevalent online is a small sample size being equated to an incredibly accurate lot (usually inexpensive) of ammo. At 200+, the groups need to be minimum 20 shots, after the bore is fouled. You will see very few of the big online talkers posting their 1 MOA 22LR groups at 200+. Even some familiar names here talk a lot of smack but don’t post targets with more than 5 shot groups out there.
 
Just shoot inside of 200yards.

Unless you need to shoot further for specific competition, why pull your hair out?

If you can't get a consistent supply of ammo your rifle likes you are going to be forever ammo lot testing.

Try the best ammo your can find:
Lapua LR, Eley Tenex, RWS R50, etc
Shoot the entire box at 300yards over the chrony on a no wind day, what ever shoots best considering that the best possible accuracy.

You could rebarrel the rifle, add a tuner, etc, or decide it's not worth the effort/cost.
 
Just picked up 200 of each - Eley Match, Tenex, and ELR from Battlehawk. Never bought from them before. @Inline6 your last post is the information that I have been waiting to see.

I hate the black magic part of all this. My brain wont let me accept it. I have a hard stop $$$$ on testing with this barrel before I try my hand at spinning up something or have this thing Lot tested. You all have been extremely helpful. Ill post data as soon as possible.
Welcome to precision Rimfire, we offer matching tee shirts and straight jackets.
 
Just shoot inside of 200yards.

Unless you need to shoot further for specific competition, why pull your hair out?

If you can't get a consistent supply of ammo your rifle likes you are going to be forever ammo lot testing.

Try the best ammo your can find:
Lapua LR, Eley Tenex, RWS R50, etc
Shoot the entire box at 300yards over the chrony on a no wind day, what ever shoots best considering that the best possible accuracy.

You could rebarrel the rifle, add a tuner, etc, or decide it's not worth the effort/cost.
We do these things not because they are easy, but because they are hard.
 
Had to sight in a new scope today. Still waiting on new ammo to arrive. Ran 100rds of CX. used 10rds to sight in and 10 used for tall target testing.

Best 10 shot grouping @ 100yds = .85" vertical, .30" wind
Best 20 shot grouping @ 100yds = .94" vertical, .74" wind

I did observe a cold bore shift at the 50yd which made me second guess my windage zero.

The shot groups seem to tighten up as the bore gets warmer.... I will try to source a thermal cam to record this next trip.

79 shots recorded with the XERO (1 got ejected due to cold range) the results for CX are as follows:

Min 1077.3 FPS
AVG 1091.9 FPS
Max 1110.3 FPS
ES 33.0 FPS
SD 6.2 FPS

Im curious how barrel temp impact MV and would it be worth it to set up a DAQ and thermo couple the exterior of the barrel at (X) interval.

Want to lower that ES for sure. I have not recored such a long string before. at most 30rds but typically 10 - 20.

More to come when the new ammo arrives.
 
Had to sight in a new scope today. Still waiting on new ammo to arrive. Ran 100rds of CX. used 10rds to sight in and 10 used for tall target testing.

Best 10 shot grouping @ 100yds = .85" vertical, .30" wind
Best 20 shot grouping @ 100yds = .94" vertical, .74" wind

I did observe a cold bore shift at the 50yd which made me second guess my windage zero.

The shot groups seem to tighten up as the bore gets warmer.... I will try to source a thermal cam to record this next trip.

79 shots recorded with the XERO (1 got ejected due to cold range) the results for CX are as follows:

Min 1077.3 FPS
AVG 1091.9 FPS
Max 1110.3 FPS
ES 33.0 FPS
SD 6.2 FPS

Im curious how barrel temp impact MV and would it be worth it to set up a DAQ and thermo couple the exterior of the barrel at (X) interval.

Want to lower that ES for sure. I have not recored such a long string before. at most 30rds but typically 10 - 20.

More to come when the new ammo arrives.
33fps is about as good as you are going to get.

Over 10-20 shots you can get better but over 50+ an ES of 30-40fps isn't bad at all.
 
Yes sir, you are right on.

OP:
CCI is shit ammo in this conversation. Shoot a 20-30 shot group of Eley Match or Tenex, after seasoning the bore with at least 10 shots first.
Lots of posters are trying to be diplomatic here. Get off your damn wallet. XAct, Midas+, Tenex, Eley Match before you waste any more time messing around. I sound mean, but I’m trying to help you understand the realities of Rimfire at 200+.
Had the opportunity to shoot half a box of Lapua long range today... ABSOLUTE HAMMER!!!!!!!
200yds 10 round group was sub MOA did not keep the target but the grouping was under 2".
300yds things kinda opend up and I was slightly over 5".
Pretty damn surprised! At the time I built this rifle long range and super long range Lapua ammo was not a thing. Midas and XACT did not shoot as well as CX did. Stopped shooting for a little over 4 years ago.

Waiting on the Eley to come in but I have regained some confidence in this barrel.
 
SK long range match was shot but I stopped after 10 rounds. Had a 40fps ES in that string. My buddy had roughly the same ES out of his CZ457 but he was crushing the 200yd mark with it. He pushed out to 300 and was able to print with it on an 18x24” target.
 
SK long range match was shot but I stopped after 10 rounds. Had a 40fps ES in that string. My buddy had roughly the same ES out of his CZ457 but he was crushing the 200yd mark with it. He pushed out to 300 and was able to print with it on an 18x24” target.
It’s good stuff, as far as I’ve seen. 30-40 ES is about par in rimfire.

1745165756827.png
 
Had to sight in a new scope today. Still waiting on new ammo to arrive. Ran 100rds of CX. used 10rds to sight in and 10 used for tall target testing.

Best 10 shot grouping @ 100yds = .85" vertical, .30" wind
Best 20 shot grouping @ 100yds = .94" vertical, .74" wind

I did observe a cold bore shift at the 50yd which made me second guess my windage zero.

The shot groups seem to tighten up as the bore gets warmer.... I will try to source a thermal cam to record this next trip.

79 shots recorded with the XERO (1 got ejected due to cold range) the results for CX are as follows:

Min 1077.3 FPS
AVG 1091.9 FPS
Max 1110.3 FPS
ES 33.0 FPS
SD 6.2 FPS

Im curious how barrel temp impact MV and would it be worth it to set up a DAQ and thermo couple the exterior of the barrel at (X) interval.

Want to lower that ES for sure. I have not recored such a long string before. at most 30rds but typically 10 - 20.

More to come when the new ammo arrives.
A .94" and .85" at 100yds is not bad. For myself I like 5 shot groups. You can get them fired before the conditions change. Don't worry about the ES and SD, You can't do anything about it That is the Beast for a rimfire. Find the ammo that shoots best in your gun. You will have vertical in the group at longer ranges. I tuner will take the vertical out of the groups. If your barrel is threaded get a EC V2 tuner, if not threaded get something like a Harrell bolt on.
 
A .94" and .85" at 100yds is not bad. For myself I like 5 shot groups. You can get them fired before the conditions change. Don't worry about the ES and SD, You can't do anything about it That is the Beast for a rimfire. Find the ammo that shoots best in your gun. You will have vertical in the group at longer ranges. I tuner will take the vertical out of the groups. If your barrel is threaded get a EC V2 tuner, if not threaded get something like a Harrell bolt on.
Agreed, don’t worry about the velocity! For the most part I track velocity only to track group size. Been shooting Rimfire for over 45 years and never had a way to check SD/ES so I just trusted the box for velocity, but I would track average group size and link to brand/velocity.
 
A .94" and .85" at 100yds is not bad. For myself I like 5 shot groups. You can get them fired before the conditions change. Don't worry about the ES and SD, You can't do anything about it That is the Beast for a rimfire. Find the ammo that shoots best in your gun. You will have vertical in the group at longer ranges. I tuner will take the vertical out of the groups. If your barrel is threaded get a EC V2 tuner, if not threaded get something like a Harrell bolt on.
You like tooooners because you use 5 shot groups…… 😂😂😂😂
 
A .94" and .85" at 100yds is not bad. For myself I like 5 shot groups. You can get them fired before the conditions change. Don't worry about the ES and SD, You can't do anything about it That is the Beast for a rimfire. Find the ammo that shoots best in your gun. You will have vertical in the group at longer ranges. I tuner will take the vertical out of the groups. If your barrel is threaded get a EC V2 tuner, if not threaded get something like a Harrell bolt on.
ES is directly related to group size though. Inside of 150yards you can get away with a lot but at 300yards a high ES is going to give poor performance, the whole point of this this thread.

5 shot groups at 100yards are great if you want to cherry pick groups.

Notice how he said best groups were .94" and .85" that means the actual accuracy worse than that.

Again if the OP wants to shoot consistently at 300yards, cheery picking groups and ignoring ES isn't going to help.
 
I like tuner because they work. I shoot long range steel. I don't waste my time or ammo shooting 5, 10, 20, or what ever the group count is today. I only shoot groups when tuning. I set up 12" plates for sighters and shoot 4", 3 ", 2" and 1" at 200yds. I shoot Long Gong at 300yds 8", 6" and 4". I also shoot clays at 200yds and 300yds, I hit the clays then shoot the pieces. The OP has not said what type of shooting he does. If the end game is steel, then shoot steel.
The ES of your ammo is what it is. You can't change it. You have to shoot and know what is going to do down range. ES is not going the be your problem, The wing is going the be your problem. The OP said he shot SK Long Range, but stopped after 10 rounds due to ES of 40, but did not shoot it down range. I know ES will give you the vertical spread. I have taken 4" vertical spread at 200 yds down to 1" with a tuner. I done it many, many times.
I know a lot of guys don't like tuners, and troll them ever chance they get. but you can shoot with a tuner or shoot against them in a match.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: oldrifleman
I understand but there is literally no way to prove they work to anyone else. I have struggled with them off and on for years. Back a few, Anschutz USA was clearing out some 54-18 actions do the Custom shop started creating 54-18 benchrest repeaters (yeah an oxymoron). I have their #1 rifle and I told Steve B that I didn’t need one. I was seeing some vertical so I bought a Harrels and put it on. Cleaned it up. Some ammo was more affected and as I buy cases, I live with the results. The thing is you can’t prove that you either didn’t lie about the good or that you didn’t fudge the bad. It is something a person has to be interested in and try’s for themselves.
 
Tuner is cheap enough to give it a whirl. Worst case Im out a couple hundo, best case I can stop chasing and burning ammo. I was on track to turn my own barrel with a 14 to 14.5 gain twist chambered with a 52D reamer. Lapua LR gave me confidence that this 20" ace barrel can print at distance so a new barrel has been put on hold until I can validate that there is an ammo type that works well consistenly. I could have turned my own tuner but I have no refrence for guidance.
I have the targets that I have tested with CX ranging from 50yds to 300yds. If I can clean up the verticle at 300yds without ruining closer accruacy, I would call it an improvment. I still have the same lot of CX ammo and will rerun a series of test back to back with and without the tuner and report back.

Still waiting on my Eley to come in for testing as well.

Anyone have a resasonble (not 1000 round single target) test they would like to see preformed? I have 50, 100, 207, and 307 yard distances I can shoot at.

-Jay
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldrifleman
Tuner is cheap enough to give it a whirl. Worst case Im out a couple hundo, best case I can stop chasing and burning ammo. I was on track to turn my own barrel with a 14 to 14.5 gain twist chambered with a 52D reamer. Lapua LR gave me confidence that this 20" ace barrel can print at distance so a new barrel has been put on hold until I can validate that there is an ammo type that works well consistenly. I could have turned my own tuner but I have no refrence for guidance.
I have the targets that I have tested with CX ranging from 50yds to 300yds. If I can clean up the verticle at 300yds without ruining closer accruacy, I would call it an improvment. I still have the same lot of CX ammo and will rerun a series of test back to back with and without the tuner and report back.

Still waiting on my Eley to come in for testing as well.

Anyone have a resasonble (not 1000 round single target) test they would like to see preformed? I have 50, 100, 207, and 307 yard distances I can shoot at.

-Jay
I did a large test awhile back. Shot 6 five shot groups at each setting. Did a total of 2 revs plus no tuner. Used an app to find the X,Y of each shot and input them in excel for a 30rd agg group. Each setting/group was also randomly fired. Calculated the mean radius for each setting. Also ran a P test against each setting. Even picked the “best” and “worst” setting and reshot the test on different day. Concluded they don’t work….. this was on a DI vudoo with a MW barrel using center X. I followed Reloading all day’s protocol, which if I remember right is similar to what applied ballistics did.
 
I did a large test awhile back. Shot 6 five shot groups at each setting. Did a total of 2 revs plus no tuner. Used an app to find the X,Y of each shot and input them in excel for a 30rd agg group. Each setting/group was also randomly fired. Calculated the mean radius for each setting. Also ran a P test against each setting. Even picked the “best” and “worst” setting and reshot the test on different day. Concluded they don’t work….. this was on a DI vudoo with a MW barrel using center X. I followed Reloading all day’s protocol, which if I remember right is similar to what applied ballistics did.
What is your barrel OD?
 
What is your barrel OD?
MTU profile. 24”. I did a similar test a long time ago with a kukri profile vudoo and concluded the same thing. But it was only 15 rd groups so I wanted to try again. And that test I didn’t remove the tuner completely. I think adding a weight may or may not do something. I think twisting a tuner doesn’t do crap….
 
Not realistic to think you can consistently hold sub moa at 300yds with a 22lr...just too many variables come into play. I strive for gun/ammo combo that can hold that at 200, beyond that it is what it is on any given day.
This X 1000

There’s a reason there aren’t national BR comps at 300.

22rf is “a shoe box” at 300 if you shoot enough no matter what you spend.
 
Not trying to be Sub MOA but would like to be consistently better than 2.
Not happening lol

Youll get a good brick with some very good boxes but 6” at 300 even with out environmentals is not happening for a “entire summer”.

Some of the crazy BR guys in England only buy ammo from a certain employee and certain equipment that employee uses.

If they can’t shoot well enough at 300 to make it a real sanctioned competition it’s just not happening.
 
I understand but there is literally no way to prove they work to anyone else. I have struggled with them off and on for years. Back a few, Anschutz USA was clearing out some 54-18 actions do the Custom shop started creating 54-18 benchrest repeaters (yeah an oxymoron). I have their #1 rifle and I told Steve B that I didn’t need one. I was seeing some vertical so I bought a Harrels and put it on. Cleaned it up. Some ammo was more affected and as I buy cases, I live with the results. The thing is you can’t prove that you either didn’t lie about the good or that you didn’t fudge the bad. It is something a person has to be interested in and try’s for themselves.
I think most people would agree there is discussion and testing to be done around tuners for reducing group size.
The issue all comes with the ignoring of ES, as ultimately this is what determines your accuracy at distance.

Almost every groups you will see is wider than it is tall (if no wind present), meaning the ES is what is dictating the ultimate accuracy.
My limited testing mimics Jajas extensive 50 @ 200 testing, which basically shows group size is ES at distance, when pluging the minimum and maximum numbers into Strelok you'll get a difference in drop that more or less equals what you see on target.
I appreciate you can't change your ES, but that's the point.

If you can't get a stable supply of ammo that has a low ES, shooting at 200yards + is just a recipes for frustration.
If your groups at 300yards are 8" tall due to ammo ES, then trying to do long gong on targets that are 6" or 4" means you are just gambling that most of the shots will be on target.
If you are trying to shoot targets that are smaller than what your rifle and ammo is actually capable of, then expect it to be frustrating once you start getting competitive (or overly competitive).

It's the difference between the NF ELR challenge and a 1000yard 22lr trick shot.
NF ELR is within a distance people can be expected to make consistent hit's if the shooter gets the fundamentals and environmentals right.
Where as a 1000 yard trick shoot is always going to be a case of just shooting until you get lucky, or you shoot at a big enough target that it doesn't represent any real form of accuracy.

Some people may enjoy the "trick shot" style and that is fine, by sounds like the OP was finding it frustrating, hence my comment to limit shooting to 200yards. I know I started getting frustrate in shooting matches starting out with CCI Standard, as the long distance targets became a luck thing rather than skill, and you just had to shoot until you got a hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChrisFetter
I did a large test awhile back. Shot 6 five shot groups at each setting. Did a total of 2 revs plus no tuner. Used an app to find the X,Y of each shot and input them in excel for a 30rd agg group. Each setting/group was also randomly fired. Calculated the mean radius for each setting. Also ran a P test against each setting. Even picked the “best” and “worst” setting and reshot the test on different day. Concluded they don’t work….. this was on a DI vudoo with a MW barrel using center X. I followed Reloading all day’s protocol, which if I remember right is similar to what applied ballistics did.
You did not say how far you were shoot, and the size of your groups. And how you concluded they don't work. By only going 2 revs, you left out a lot area for tuning. You did not go far enough. A Harrell tuner has 500 settings 25/ rev, total of 20 revs. A EC V2 tuner has 200 setting 50/rev. total of 4 revs. The Harrells are made to start all the way into the shooter and go out. I have seen the best tune all the way out to 500. The EC V2 starts flush with muzzle and go into the shooter. I have found the best tunes 3 to 4 revs. in 2 guns. My Tikka T1x is 10 off full into the shooter almost 4 revs in.

I start tuning a 50yds with 3 shot groups ( any more is a waste of ammo for now ) With the EC V2 tuner a turn 5 marks and repeat all the way in ( with Harrell I go one full rev ( 25 clicks ) You will see the group open and close, you are looking for the best vertical. you may see many in a row that are good. Then you can go back to the best of the best and shoot as many rounds as you like. I shoot long range, I take the best of the best to 200yds ( you need a good wind day ). This is where you can take a 4" vertical and fine tune 1 to 2 marks at a time each way for 10 marks and get a 1" group. You can call BS, but I have done it many times. That is the only test I can tell you. You can fine tune and take a group with vertical a turn it onto a round group.
 
Last edited: