That’s a great group. Probably quarter-inch or less if you measure center to center.I'm using the same Berger 230s with a 26" 1:8. 2970ft/s with 84.9gr of Retumbo, Lapua brass, and a Fed 215M. Started seeing pressure signs above 86.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s a great group. Probably quarter-inch or less if you measure center to center.I'm using the same Berger 230s with a 26" 1:8. 2970ft/s with 84.9gr of Retumbo, Lapua brass, and a Fed 215M. Started seeing pressure signs above 86.
Lots of people run 245 Bergers with 85gr of N570. I'd back it off and start at about 80So if Berger data is off, where is a good starting place for VV N570 and N560 and 215 bergers? What about 245 bergers?
Why are you only running enough powder for a 300PRC?Good catch. Thanks. 8 twist. Was a busy day.
Well, the ES and SD are hard to argue with, but I have the same rifle/barrel (but with an Ultra 338 Gen 1 on the end). I haven't shot the 245s yet, but the factory Berger 230 load was right at 3000fps to begin with. Later lots have been around 2940 avg. All to say, 2760 seems awful slow, but I haven't hand loaded for it yet. My loads in the 27" AXSR 300PRC are 78.1gr Retumbo running 2895 with a 230 Berger, and the 338NM (same case as the 300NM) with 88.1gr Retumbo running a 300gr Berger at 2742. Accuracy is similar to yours with all of the above. Also, it is true that Retumbo gives better velocities with the heavier bullets than H1000, so there's that too. And, you are doing better on MV than their data for the 245 shows, even at that load. I will be developing a 245 Berger/Retumbo load for the 300NM soon, but based on how it shot the factory loaded 230s near 3000, I'm hoping for something around 2900 for the 245s.The load was chosen based on performance and pressure. I started testing a grain below RCBS suggested max and went up looking for pressure warning signs. Box 1 was 73 up to 82 in .5 increments and found several loads worth exploring further. Many loads had great numbers but bad groups. For box 2 I took the last results and made the increments .25 which shrunk choices to only a couple. Box 3 was the final test so I needed a larger sample size of 25 each. 150 total rounds.
All great decisions, and with that ES and SD you are way ahead of the game vs a higher MV at their expense. I was just surprised you got into pressure at that MV. I may be seeing the same thing when I get there shortly. I was just extrapolating from what I got out of the 230s.I agree it sounds slow and a different powder would be better. I used what I had and got a deal on the 245s. I tend to err on the side of brass life as our hobby is increasingly expensive. My tests found slightly heavier bolt lift around 77 and that’s my sign to chill out.
Yeah, but my 338 Norma will run a 300gr nearly that fast (2740-2750) as he's getting from a 245 (2760) using the same basic case and barrel length/manufacturer. Factory Berger 230s in the 300 Norma were pushing 3000 pre-Covid. I wasn't suggesting he should be anywhere near 3000, but maybe near 2900 seems possible. 2760 just seems awfully low for going up a mere 15gr in bullet wt. BUT, as I said, he's got outstanding accuracy and ES/SD, so it's a great load and I agree with his decision to run it. I think, and he seems to agree, it's probably the H1000 being a little fast to get the MV up for the heavier bullet. I'm going to be trying Retumbo on the 245 very soon, although N570 seems to give optimum performance - I'm just a little shy of the reports of decreased barrel life and heavy fouling associated with it. It's already a pretty short barrel life to begin with.To be fair he’s shooting 245’s. Most people north of 3k are shooting 215’s or 230’s.
I'm also using the M-die for the 300PRC and have been lobbying them to go ahead and come out with the 300NM for over a year. Did you get some info from them suggesting they were going to come out with it soon? Early 2025 is almost here!Looking forward to Area 419 producing .300NM insert sleeve for their "M" series die, hopefully early 2025. We already have the "M" die for my wife's .300 PRC, and the precision and ease with which desired shoulder set back can be acheived, coupled with true full-length resizing and neck mandrel, justifies the up-front investment . No clickers, no bolt lift resistance.
Why do you like RL50?So Im pretty sure Ive finalized my loads for the 300 NM with 250 A-Tips and Reloder 50. However, the group size is only .77 MOA which I felt rushed and was fighting mirage from my can. Maybe I can tighten it up without adjusting the seating depth, but in comparison, the Berger 230 factory ammo was 0.8x MOA and was 2886 fps, SD 20.2 and ES 85 (25 rounds), and was still able to produce a 1.23 MOA 5-round group at 1730 yards, which those 5 rounds had an ES of 18.
AXSR 27" factory barrel (1:8) with TBAC 338 Ultra SR
Lapua 300NM brass
CCI 250 OEM primers (only primers I could find in the last year)
250 A-Tip BTO: 2.845" (0.02" off lands, and 0.102" off mag COAL)
91.0 gr RL50
2895 fps
SD: 3.52
ES: 8
(only 5 rounds fired of Magnetospeed)
But, you can’t get it anymore, can you?That being said, I have not compared it to N570. Chances are, its a more suitable powder, but I think RL50 is a viable option.
Blue Collar Reloading, Powder Valley, and Natchezss all have it in stock right now.But, you can’t get it anymore, can you?
Ok. My understanding is that all the Alliant (including RL) powders are no longer being produced for the civilian market, and that once it’s gone, it’s gone.Blue Collar Reloading, Powder Valley, and Natchezss all have it in stock right now.
Well apparently Ive been living with my head in the sand. That sucks.Ok. My understanding is that all the Alliant (including RL) powders are no longer being produced for the civilian market, and that once it’s gone, it’s gone.
What do you think about either powder with 245/250s with a 30" barrel?RL33 and RL50 are both kind of on the slow side for the cartridge in general, but doable for shooting 250s - you're just going to be leaving a little performance on the table (and maybe some unburnt powder).
Yes, it does. Even though I don't use them, we need all the players at the table because it helps all of us. It was posted here, and a bunch of other forums all over the net.Well apparently Ive been living with my head in the sand. That sucks.
RL and H50 both are very consistent as far as speeds with 245s but suck balls in the speed department. A good thing I guess would be that you can never be overpressure with those powders in this case lolDoable, but not ideal or optimized for the cartridge.
I find RL33 a bit slower than N570, and better suited for .338LM or Improved (it was my go to with 300s for the latter). RL50 is even slower so it doesn’t really make sense to me in a .300NM, but that’s just a hunch. I think RL50 is more popular with 37xc and 375CT, but I don’t shoot either of those these days so not direct experience.
.300NM is a lot like a .300WM shooting heavies or a .338LM shooting 250s, so lots of powers in that range from H1000 & Retumbo, RL25 | 26 | 33, and N170 | N565 | N568 | N570. And then weirdly I have one barrel I shoot 178s with N165.
I shoot a 300 norma improved but thinking about adding a straight 300 norma barrel so I don't have to improve for everything. What are you guys seeing performance wise n568 and n565 245 berger in the straight? What freebore you guys running for the 245?
Freebore is whatever AI uses PLUS whatever n570 has burned away.Freebore is whatever AI has in their barrels
If you already have improved dies, brass why get a straight?I shoot a 300 norma improved but thinking about adding a straight 300 norma barrel so I don't have to improve for everything. What are you guys seeing performance wise n568 and n565 245 berger in the straight? What freebore you guys running for the 245?
Use N570 data and you’ll be on the safe side of things. N570 will produce a bit more velocity, but N568 max charges are a little larger(like 1%).I am new to the 300NM, have a bunch of Berger 220 LRHTs, N568, Retumbo, and H1000. Any advise on which powder to try first? Also, I'm having trouble finding data for N568 if anyone can point me in the right direction. Thanks!
It takes me 10 seconds to rebarrel, and exactly two days to get a new barrel from the point I decide I want to do it to it being at my house.Because usually it's just 50 fps or so compared to RETUMBO? I HATE getting rifles rebarreled, the wait time, the remeasurement and repeat load development and sighting in and break in and all that is a pain in the ass, and N570 is the ONE powder that guarantees you're going to be doing that more often. Unless you just shoot 50 rounds a year.