Federal does it again šŸ˜…

I havenā€™t seen any data on a 20ā€ bbl 28 Nosler and what it can do. I suspect it will lose a lot of velocity, so not the same thing.

As for totalitarian communist states I donā€™t hunt there so for me it doesnā€™t matter. I live in SD, and only intend to hunt here, WY, MO, NE, and MN. Legal in all those spots so happy meal for me.
I compared several reloading manuals and some articles referencing various barrel length 28 Nosler rifles that the authors tested. Itā€™s uncanny how similar the results of a generic 20ā€ 28 Nosler are to the advertised 7 BC performance.
 
Can you link those articles?

Nosler factory rifles come with 24ā€ bblā€™s and I assume the velocity data for their ammo is with a 24ā€ test bbl. They show a 175 Accubond at 3125 fps at the muzzle, which I believe with a 24ā€-26ā€ bbl, I suspect the slow burning powder needs at least that length to push that velocity with a lower pressure than 7BC. You may be right that at 20ā€ 28 Nosler will only give up 125-175fps vs a 24ā€, I think it might be more than that with factory ammo but I could be wrong.
 
Can you link those articles?

Nosler factory rifles come with 24ā€ bblā€™s and I assume the velocity data for their ammo is with a 24ā€ test bbl. They show a 175 Accubond at 3125 fps at the muzzle, which I believe with a 24ā€-26ā€ bbl, I suspect the slow burning powder needs at least that length to push that velocity with a lower pressure than 7BC. You may be right that at 20ā€ 28 Nosler will only give up 125-175fps vs a 24ā€, I think it might be more than that with factory ammo but I could be wrong.
I just googled it. A 26ā€ 175 gr 28 Nos runs about 3150 or do at the šŸ” c the reloading table. Looks like around 25fps drop/inch shorter when comparing 24ā€ to 26ā€. Means about 3K at 20ā€ w/175gr. If the 7BC actually is as fast as they say, about the same result. Now consider the howler monkey shrieks about muzzle blast, noise, recoil, and short barrel life from a 20ā€ 28 Nosler, and ask yourself how the same bullet at the same velocity will be any different from the 7BC? Hell, if the 7BC is actually faster, all those complaints will be even worse.
 
Donā€™t care about barrel life.

Iā€™d buy a few boxes of factory ammo to test, figure out what it likes and buy about 300 rounds of that. For hunting it would last me 20 years.

Whether 7BC or 28 Nosler I wouldnā€™t shoot either in any volume, and wouldnā€™t bother reloading for either of them. I have more and more limited free time between work and family obligations. Plus if I charge myself labor at my rate of pay as a RR engineer I canā€™t really ā€œaffordā€ to take a trip off to reload, and when I do have free time these days frankly I just donā€™t want to make it a priority if I can buy decent factory ammo and go shoot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 260284
I am definitely in the minority here. I will be watching this development closely. I bought a 7 PRC last year specifically for a muley hunt and was crazy impressed with it's performance. I took a large buck at 654 yards and it never moved a step. The only thing I didn't like about my setup was 22" of barrel as I prefer much shorter. I run my 6.5 CMs in 16.5".

7mm Backcountry in 16.5" of barrel is faster than my 22" 7 PRC with the same grain weight (175's). Admittedly, I was also very interested in the .277 Fury, which never really panned out. The problem with the Fury is you could not run it in standard actions. Peak Alloy seems to solve that issue.

I don't plan on going out west again until 26' so I've got some time to watch this play out. But I will stick my neck out and say this: Most seem to think this thing is DOA. I believe it is a changing of the guard. Maybe this particular Peak Alloy cartridge won't make it, but this technology overall is something that I think is going to push this industry in a new direction. Who doesn't want increased speeds in shorter barrels? This is honestly the type of ammo development I have been waiting for.
 
I am definitely in the minority here. I will be watching this development closely. I bought a 7 PRC last year specifically for a muley hunt and was crazy impressed with it's performance. I took a large buck at 654 yards and it never moved a step. The only thing I didn't like about my setup was 22" of barrel as I prefer much shorter. I run my 6.5 CMs in 16.5".

7mm Backcountry in 16.5" of barrel is faster than my 22" 7 PRC with the same grain weight (175's). Admittedly, I was also very interested in the .277 Fury, which never really panned out. The problem with the Fury is you could not run it in standard actions. Peak Alloy seems to solve that issue.

I don't plan on going out west again until 26' so I've got some time to watch this play out. But I will stick my neck out and say this: Most seem to think this thing is DOA. I believe it is a changing of the guard. Maybe this particular Peak Alloy cartridge won't make it, but this technology overall is something that I think is going to push this industry in a new direction. Who doesn't want increased speeds in shorter barrels? This is honestly the type of ammo development I have been waiting for.
Donā€™t get rid of your 7PRC just yet

 
I think 7 BC is going to fill a specific niche. People who want 7 PRC 24" barrel speed out of a 20 inch barrel and shorter action. Possibly a lighter rifle.
I am happy with my 7 PRC and would not need a 7 BC. Just as those people who have a 7 RM need not get a 7 PRC unless you are just wanting the heavy for caliber bullets for some reason. Again, a number of elk have been taken with 7 RM.

Will 7 BC suffer the fate of the 6.8 Western? Who knows?
 
I think 7 BC is going to fill a specific niche. People who want 7 PRC 24" barrel speed out of a 20 inch barrel and shorter action. Possibly a lighter rifle.
I am happy with my 7 PRC and would not need a 7 BC. Just as those people who have a 7 RM need not get a 7 PRC unless you are just wanting the heavy for caliber bullets for some reason. Again, a number of elk have been taken with 7 RM.

Will 7 BC suffer the fate of the 6.8 Western? Who knows?
6.8 Western suffers simply because most LR guys don't trust Winchester for precision ammo and the support for firearms out of the gate was low.
There is already more manufacturers with 7BC guns than there are with 6.8W.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronws
6.8 Western suffers simply because most LR guys don't trust Winchester for precision ammo and the support for firearms out of the gate was low.
There is already more manufacturers with 7BC guns than there are with 6.8W.
I have seen on guns dot com the 6.8 W is available from Winchester, Browning, and Christensen Arms. And that is it. So, essentially, you can buy factory but, for whatever reason, there was not a lot of interest in it. And I think you are right. Some of that is lack of confidence in Winchester ammo.

As opposed to new cartridges from Hornady and Federal, which are generally good performers. Even if the 7 PRC is slower than anticipated, it is still performing will with BC that it has.

I am far from an expert, just my observations as a fly on the wall.
 
Donā€™t get rid of your 7PRC just yet


That's was awful. Those guys simply regurgitating what you can read on the internet. And then half of their complaints about the cartridge are not even true. This 7 BC thing may turn out to be a bust, in which I'll keeping running PRC, but there is a lot of unwarranted bias out there.
 
That's was awful. Those guys simply regurgitating what you can read on the internet. And then half of their complaints about the cartridge are not even true. This 7 BC thing may turn out to be a bust, in which I'll keeping running PRC, but there is a lot of unwarranted bias out there.

I mean those guys are big into the .223 for moose camp so itā€™s not surprising.
 
Again, I am not an expert.

I know some of the people getting lower speeds on 7 PRC are shooting out of 20 inch barrels when the round was originally conceived for a 24 inch barrel.

And Federal was gaining in the market because their 7 PRC was closer to the 3000 fps. I think they should have stuck with that. 7 BC may not do enough for everyone.

Like the guys in the video are saying, it might appeal to a few hunters who do not reload. But the accuracy is the problem. Not just that, time of flight.

That's why, even if I substitute 2850 for MV for 7 PRC, it still works for me because the accuracy is good and I am not going to shoot an elk or any game animal at 1000 yards. In fact, probably not going past 400 yards. And where I usually hunt, you are lucky to see 50 yards through the trees.

Edited to erase the evidence of my mistake.
 
Last edited:
Again, I am not an expert.

I know some of the people getting lower speeds on 7 PRC are shooting out of 20 inch barrels when the round was originally conceived for a 24 inch barrel.

And Federal was gaining in the market because their 7 PRC was closer to the 3000 fps. I think they should have stuck with that. 7 BC may not do enough for everyone.

Like the guys in the video are saying, it might appeal to a few hunters who do not reload. But the accuracy is the problem. Not just that, time of flight.

At 1000 yards, flight time is over 1.8 seconds and an animal can move just enough to be missed or wounded. Even everyone's favorite, Jim at Backfire, wounded an animal at a significantly shorter distance because the animal moved just as the trigger broke. He looked for a while and then found it again by accident while driving around the property to exit. He then had a better angle and shot well the second time and harvested the animal.

In addition, according to the shooter's calculator, using grain weight of 170 grains and MV of 3000 and G7 BC of .325, it is subsonic past 850 yards.

State of Commierado states that you should hit elk with at least 1500 ft-lbs and the 7 BC drops below that around 350 yards.

Or even using 1800 fps as a minimum impact velocity, that is only good to 450 yards.

And the rifles so far, especially in maybe a Savage, are just not grouping tight enough to shoot that far. Don't get me wrong, I realize that a 1 to 1.5 MOA rifle is okay within a short distance but that is still a problem. Because while the gun, itself, can be 1.5 MOA, the shooter can bring more error.

I am sure that I am wrong but it seems to me that the only bragging point so far is getting 3000 out of a short action by using an unapproved steel case to hold higher pressure, possibly at the cost of precision.

That's why, even if I substitute 2850 for MV for 7 PRC, it still works for me because the accuracy is good and I am not going to shoot an elk or any game animal at 1000 yards. In fact, probably not going past 400 yards. And where I usually hunt, you are lucky to see 50 yards through the trees.
Um I think you have your calculator set to G1, Iā€™m coming up with 900 yards for 1800 fps, 1500 yards for transonic and a 1.37 TOF to 1000 yards with the .347 G7 of the 175gr ELD-X at 2860 fps.
 
I was using the 7 BC specs that I pulled off the interwebs for 170 gr 7 BC.

I know for my 7 PRC spec, G7 is .347
What I meant is when you put it in your calculator you forgot to switch it to G7 as the only way I get your numbers with a subsonic at 850 is with a G1 of .325.

IMG_7700.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronws
What I meant is when you put it in your calculator you forgot to switch it to G7 as the only way I get your numbers with a subsonic at 850 is with a G1 of .325.

View attachment 8622856

What I meant is when you put it in your calculator you forgot to switch it to G7 as the only way I get your numbers with a subsonic at 850 is with a G1 of .325.

View attachment 8622856
You are right, I did goof up putting .329 in the G1 when I meant to select G7. It really was a clerical error on my part. I was doing a couple of other things at the same time.

I still think a lot of guys could probably stick 7 RM and be just fine.

@gopherslayer Sorry I woke the dog up.

Edited to add: somehow, this did not post yesterday when I wrote it.

This is just not my week.
 
@Ronws that didnā€™t wake her up. Sheā€™s always on alert even when sleeping (sleeps with her eyes open sometimes) and feeds off of her surroundings. When I hear a car door out front and say WTF she tears off to the door growling and bristled up like sheā€™s going to rip someone apart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ronws