Hawkhills on pretty much everything anymore. Great quality and short lead times. I run 219 bore on all 22 cal, 237 bore on all 6mms.@406shootist
What brand barrel?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hawkhills on pretty much everything anymore. Great quality and short lead times. I run 219 bore on all 22 cal, 237 bore on all 6mms.@406shootist
What brand barrel?
That’s really discouraging news. The question is will you do it again or go back the 6GT?Barrel life update:
Started shedding jackets with 1250 rounds on it 2 weeks ago. Confirmed with both 90SMK and Berger 85.5 LRHT. She gone.
Bore scope showed significant carbon retention around the shoulder/neck junction and into the leade.
Ran some Iosso patches through it and it unsurprisingly revealed some of the worst carnage I’ve ever seen. There were essentially no lands left in the throat, jagged edges where the lands remained in tact, and had significant fire cracking present 6-8” beyond the chamber. When I say it was torched it was TORCHED.
Interestingly enough, it shot well right up to that point. But once it started going, it fell off a cliff.
Notes of interest:
- Brux 28” - 1:6.5 twist - .218 bore diameter
- steady diet of 3120-3150fps over the life of the barrel
- adjusted the load after cleaning to see if slower speeds would keep the jackets together with no such luck
I would say a variety of factors contributed to this barrel being pretty short-lived. Between the speeds/firing intervals, twist rate, bore size, etc. I’m somewhat surprised it lasted as long as it did. That said, I have no idea how guys are getting 2k plus out of these things shooting anywhere near normal speeds. I just don’t see it.
Haven’t decided if I’m going to replace it and keep going or sell off the components and go a different direction. I would change a number of factors if I were to do it over again.
Thank you for posting this. I can’t imagine the SMK bearing surface would cause significantly Higher psi. It’s odd my brass has all cratered primers at 34/35gr h4350 or Whatever im using. Stupid AI.It's a burn rate and pressure curve issue, not just fill. Fill is more of a guideline; you don't want to use a powder that leaves the case too empty as it might have inconsistent ignition, nor do you want a powder that's so compressed it results in inconsistent seating depths, and crunching the crap out of the powder with a heavily compressed load can break it down into smaller pieces which will alter the surface area of the kernels and can change the burn rate characteristics which can result in weird pressure spikes or increased SD/ES.
For instance, from the tables above 38.16gr of 4955 is 102% fill, yields 59.4ksi pressure and 3072 fps, and it isn't fully burned by the time the bullet leaves the barrel. Even if you altered the density of 4955 to make it more dense per grain (so you could physically pack more in the case) but maintained the same burn characteristics and overall energy content per grain of powder you still couldn't safely put more in the case to reach a higher velocity because it would be at max pressure; the burn characteristics of 4955 just aren't ideal for that case and bullet combo, it hits max pressure before achieving your targeted velocity.
On the other hand, if you use RL16 and adjust the charge to the same 59.4ksi target pressure it takes 35.76gr of RL16 which is 95.8% fill but QL comes back with 3158fps.
4955 is slower than RL16 based on Hodgdon's burn rate chart (RL16 is #129, while 4955 is #145.) Based on the QL data the 4955 burn characteristics aren't ideal for the 22GT even with 90s, so even with a near max pressure load of 4955 the estimated velocity is slower than the more ideal powders at the same or even lower pressures.
Oddly enough, at the same target pressure of 59.4ksi QL estimates the fastest powder for 90s in the 22GT would be RL26; using 41.6gr which is a 101% fill it's estimating 3250fps at the same 59.4ksi pressure as 4955 and RL16 above. What's kind of odd is RL26 is even slower on the burn rate chart than 4955 (RL26 is #157) but obviously the burn and pressure characteristics are different as the estimated velocity with RL26 is much higher. RL26 really seems to be the speed king in many loads that use heavy for caliber bullets, provided there's enough case capacity for it.
QL allows you to quickly "test" a bunch of powders in your case/bullet combo by specifying a target pressure and max fill percentage and it returns results sorted in order of velocity. I usually like to have it run that powder database test around 52.5ksi and 105% max fill. I haven't messed with Gordon's reloading tool but I'm guessing it would have a similar feature.
As mentioned earlier I don't have the dimensions for the 88 ELDM, but here's what QL shows for a 90 VLD @ 2.6" with H4350 in a 26" barrel which should be close...
View attachment 8114632
Thank you for posting this. I can’t imagine the SMK bearing surface would cause significantly Higher psi. It’s odd my brass has all cratered primers at 34/35gr h4350 or Whatever im using. Stupid AI.
Still cant figure out my pressure issue. I think a carbon ring is forming. 34g H4350 behind 88 eldm. running right at 2950 in my 24" barrel. I hit about 50-60 rounds and start getting significant pressure. Anyone else running into this after so few rounds? Thanks.
I have limited experience with StaBall, but I think all the Alliant powders I've used 15.5, 16, 19 and 23 are just as dirty if not dirtier than Staball. I have learned that you do not go extended intervals of cleaning with them or you will be sorry.The 6.5 Staball is the dirtiest powder I've tried.
@S3th , still running H4350 and 85.5s?
What load and speed are you at now?
I just shot my first few yesterday so I could get a feel for it and see what speeds I’m getting. I am at 35 grains of 4955 and 88s. Only 20 rounds so far and it’s about 2865 fps. I want to save my other powders until the barrel gets 150 rounds on it or so. Then I’ll likely use H4831SC.
The whole rifle is new so my opinion is not fully formed. I will say, coming from a 6.5CM going 2,745, I need more practice. Misses are harder to see and the bullet gets to the target noticeably faster. Overall, I am fan with no regrets. Ask me again after a few more matches and 500+ rounds. I'm sure the misses and time of flight will be less of an issue.How did you like it during the match? Are you running a brake, what kind and size?
BTW, I am runnin a 6.5mm PVA Jet4 Brake.
Easily moves steel. The match I shot yesterday had overgrown grass so everyone had issues seeing splash.Any issues seeing hits at distance? ROs have problems seeing impacts?
I'm not sure what your definition of really deep in the case is. But here's the math.
From the base of the 22GT to the neck shoulder juncture is 1.43". To the end of the chamber is 1.73". So the neck of the chamber is .3" long. The transition is usually about .015, and using a standard .120" GT freebore that gives you .435" to seat the bullet and jump it.
The bearing surface is .361 on the 85.5gr Hybrid. So if you were to perfectly line up the bearing surface boat tail juncture of the bullet to the neck shoulder juncture of the case (which still isn't perfectly accurate as the case juncture has a bit of radius) you would be jumping approximately .075". I say approximately because the ogive will actually contact the lands a little sooner than that.
But even with a .120" freebore, you can still jump .060" with nothing but the .166" boattail section of the bullet in the case. And if you have to go a little deeper that doesn't mean anything. I've shot that bullet and the 88gr ELDM in a .050" freebore 22BR and 22 Dasher. They were lasers. There are reasons to seat the bullet out in to the neck and get it out of the case, but every load doesnt have to be that way. Seating the bullet out is optional. Most often not even necessary.
I'm currently using the standard .120 freebore on my 6GT and running long ass 115gr DTACs. They are seated a little in to the case, but that doesn't hurt anything. This is last Wednesday getting ready for the PRS Pro Series Lead Farm Barrel Burner. This is 20 rounds at 1000 yards testing bullet BC. I got a .310 G7 BC and 5" of vertical dispersion.
When I sized down the GAP brass I got great e.s. and s.d. numbers, but couldn't get anything to group worth a dam. I too came to the conclusion that the necks had become too hard and that they should probably be annealed. Switching to Alpha brass solved my problems.For those using virgin GAP brass and 88 ELDMs. I sized down the neck and then ran a carbide turning mandrel though the neck. I'm getting marks/indentations on the bullets when I seat them with my Forster micrometer die. I'm wondering if the necks are too hard from the additional sizing procedures and causing the issue or if these bullets are really soft in the nose where the seater touches? The bullets don't seem to seat any harder than other bullets.View attachment 8154771
I will anneal once I get all my brass fired once. My numbers aren’t horrible, but groups are just okay. I honestly think that once I anneal the brass neck tension will be more consistent and groups will shrink.When I sized down the GAP brass I got great e.s. and s.d. numbers, but couldn't get anything to group worth a dam. I too came to the conclusion that the necks had become too hard and that they should probably be annealed. Switching to Alpha brass solved my problems.
Seat them 88s around 20 or 55 off. I've found the 88s, 109s, 140s all like these jumps. Velocity nodes for the 22gt with the 90s is 3000-3030 & 3090-3120. Stabal doesn't really stabilize until you get the pressure up.Started barrel break-in on Mon with 88 ELDM's seated 30 thou off, finding pressure limits with Staball6.5.
Started at 34gr and went up to 38gr in 1gr increments (5 @ each). Found a sticky bolt at 38 (didn't shoot all 5).
Cleaned after each batch of 5 and noticed the same as @021411 , it was dirty but cleaned easily.
None of the groups were under an inch (100yds) and I'd probably wager they all were over 1.5in. Didn't bother measuring since nothing was even promising.
Didn't bother chrono'ing since most people say not to worry about load development during barrel break-in. Does that sentiment extend to component elimination as well? Obviously I haven't tried different seating depths and I realize 1gr increments is a lot, but I'm tempted to scrap the 88 ELDM/Staball6.5 combo altogether.
I think I've seen too many of the alleged/amazing "First/Second/Third group from my new barrel!" pics that it was a bit disappointing.
"STFU and break in your barrel, it's too early to tell anything"? Or ditch the bullet/powder combo already?
Thanks guys
Bryan
My fire form/barrel break in loads. Virgin Alpha brass .222 mandrel, 37.5 gr 6.5 Staball, 88 eldm -.023 jump 2.546/1.980, old Wolf SR magnum primers. 3040 was speed with very few rounds on the 24" barrel. For the hell of it I shot a 20 round group of these at 100 early march at around 40 degrees. It was hang firing, but still put all 20 into just over an inch.Started barrel break-in on Mon with 88 ELDM's seated 30 thou off, finding pressure limits with Staball6.5.
Started at 34gr and went up to 38gr in 1gr increments (5 @ each). Found a sticky bolt at 38 (didn't shoot all 5).
Cleaned after each batch of 5 and noticed the same as @021411 , it was dirty but cleaned easily.
None of the groups were under an inch (100yds) and I'd probably wager they all were over 1.5in. Didn't bother measuring since nothing was even promising.
Didn't bother chrono'ing since most people say not to worry about load development during barrel break-in. Does that sentiment extend to component elimination as well? Obviously I haven't tried different seating depths and I realize 1gr increments is a lot, but I'm tempted to scrap the 88 ELDM/Staball6.5 combo altogether.
I think I've seen too many of the alleged/amazing "First/Second/Third group from my new barrel!" pics that it was a bit disappointing.
"STFU and break in your barrel, it's too early to tell anything"? Or ditch the bullet/powder combo already?
Thanks guys
Bryan
That's fast for a 22"! I may need to experiment with slower powders. My 36.0gr H4350 load at 3120 from a 26" barrel shows psi at times.With lower 37gn charge weights I would get occasional hang fires. Once I upped the charge the hang fires went away.
I hit the range this morning to confirm my findings from the previous session. My barrel likes 38gn of StaBALL 6.5 and the 90 SMK. I loaded some with a 10 thou jump and they were shooting really nice. The MV averaged 3103 with SD of 9. ES was 24.
I have a 1/7 22” Preferred Barrel Blanks barrel chambered by Fisher T&C with an Omega 30.
Now that barrel should be sped up & I have 200 cases I'm going to see how it does with RL 15.5 & a few different primers.
@browning442 is running 15.5 with great success in his 22" barrel, fast with 85.5 Bergers.Only testing will tell, but I think it’s going to be too fast of powder. Have you ran it through GRT or Quick Load?
I want to give it a try cause it out performed expectations in my 6.5 Creedmoore with 130's.Only testing will tell, but I think it’s going to be too fast of powder. Have you ran it through GRT or Quick Load?
That’s GRT’s estimate. I built the case and those 2 bullets in the model. Won’t know for sure till I shoot it and true the powder model.Since you are running lighter bullets that should help. Are these estimated or actual values from GRT?
Do you have the short 120fb or longer 170fb reamer?Well what do you know. 90 SMK at 1.979” CBTO which is a 20 thou jump for me fits in the MDT Dasher/BR mag. The tip of the bullet is about 2 cunt hairs or so away from the binder plate. Going to give it a whirl and see how they work out tonight. With that said I have absolutely zero issues with the MDT Poly Metal mags. They work 100%.View attachment 8173210
0.169Do you have the short 120fb or longer 170fb reamer?
For those using virgin GAP brass and 88 ELDMs. I sized down the neck and then ran a carbide turning mandrel though the neck. I'm getting marks/indentations on the bullets when I seat them with my Forster micrometer die. I'm wondering if the necks are too hard from the additional sizing procedures and causing the issue or if these bullets are really soft in the nose where the seater touches? The bullets don't seem to seat any harder than other bullets.View attachment 8154771