Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest Subscribe...but I do have the feeling that the PRC on average will be a little more lenient ES/SD-wise with load development. JMO, YMMV, etc. Overall, a good, modern magnum...
1:10 will work for most everything that's out there currently. 1:9 or 1:8 could handle something longer/heavier if it ever showed up, and stuff like the Warner flatlines. The tighter twists might also slightly improve BC on the heavies, 225-240gr stuff. As long as you keep the bullets heavier than ~150gr I don't think you'd ever need to worry about spinning them apart in .30 cal.
I went with 1:9.
As I see it , the main issue with the acceptance of the 300 PRC will be based Hornady's reputation for producing inconsistent high quality brass.
IMO - They should come out with a line of match grade brass and then have several third party tests done to confirm their brass measures up to or exceeds Lapua, RWS, Ruag, ADG, Peterson, Norma etc.... This would go a long way for the long term success of any new cartridge they design including the the 300 & 6.5 PRC
The type of people that get involved in ELR and stay with it for the long term are willing to spend the extra money to for high quality brass. They all hand load and develop pet loads for their comp rifle. Everything you buy in this sport is on the expensive side anyway and good brass is no different.
The 300 prc has a lot of well thought out positive attributes but why build a dream house on a shitty foundation? C'mon Hornady give us some decent brass!
I wonder how hard it would be on their end to keep pumping out the current quality of brass, but offer a "match" quality brass for hand loaders and all their factory match ammo.
...Of course handloaders want better brass because we have been spoiled by 10-20 firings on Lapua brass. Look at it this way though, if the PRC is a commercial success ADG or someone else will make better brass and we'll have cheap accurate factory ammo from Hornady and more rifles in 300 PRC..
Historically Lapua has been pretty fast to adopt/make brass for new cartridges, Lapua now makes Creedmoor brass alongside their own pet 6.5 and from what I have heard make 300NM brass (haven’t seen it myself because I don’t have a Norma ?). The ELR crowd is used to spending more money for better quality and Lapua knows it, if the PRC does half as well as it should I would be surprised if we didn’t see Lapooey brass in a few years. @steve123 wildcatted this round a long time ago and I recall him having quite a few firings on his 375R brass.
Historically Lapua has been pretty fast to adopt/make brass for new cartridges, Lapua now makes Creedmoor brass alongside their own pet 6.5 and from what I have heard make 300NM brass (haven’t seen it myself because I don’t have a Norma ?). The ELR crowd is used to spending more money for better quality and Lapua knows it, if the PRC does half as well as it should I would be surprised if we didn’t see Lapooey brass in a few years. @steve123 wildcatted this round a long time ago and I recall him having quite a few firings on his 375R brass.
Just read that proof research has some 300 prc stuff in the works. I'm not sure if this will include any prefits or just complete rifles. I hope this cartridge catches fire and succeeds.
I'm looking to run a 28 in 8.5 twist for the 230gr Berger hybrid.
There's a reason SOCOM went with 215's vs. the 230's. YMMV
What's the reason?
Velocity: Its that middle ground give up a little windage for a little less drop and it gets you just a little further. All about finding the sweetspot.
Just read that proof research has some 300 prc stuff in the works. I'm not sure if this will include any prefits or just complete rifles. I hope this cartridge catches fire and succeeds.
What's the reason?
I heard the same thing from a guy that was involved in the DoD selecting the 300NM.The 215's were more accurate.
I can confirm Remington offering this.https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2...ustom-700s-chambered-in-hornadys-new-300-prc/
The 300 PRC seems to be taking off fast.
Im sticking w the 300 NM! The other option is have the mag well opened up to a CIP cut. This should keep our smiths busy if the 300 PRC takes off.Hornady just confirmed the coal at 3.685" for their factory 225 eld load. So long range shooters who have actions that won't accept cip mags are limited to handloading. So much for just swapping out your 300 Win mag barrels.
Im sticking w the 300 NM! The other option is have the mag well opened up to a CIP cut. This should keep our smiths busy if the 300 PRC takes off.
I have a Remington 700 donor action but I added up the cost of having it trued and pinning a scope base and it wasn’t very much less than a Defiance action and no amount of gunsmithing in the world will make a 700 as rigid as an action with an integral rail and lug. I was already looking in this direction because my instructor in a recent class had a Surgeon XL with .532 and .585 bolts and 300 WinMag, 300 Norma and 338 Lapua barrels with wrench flats machined behind the muzzle threads.No big deal, just more down time and cost because the action will need to be re-coated.
I think you may be right about the 300 Norma. I guess I have to find an action now.
Hornady just confirmed the coal at 3.685" for their factory 225 eld load. So long range shooters who have actions that won't accept cip mags are limited to handloading. So much for just swapping out your 300 Win mag barrels.
Additionally since the .300 Win Mag and most other .30 cal magnums are hampered by the SAAMI design it prevents all but a handful of small ammo companies, such as ABM, from loading them to their full long range potential.
Do you know what the 212 eldx coal is? Can't find much info right now. Im only .04 off from running the current mags I have now with those 225s.
Having @DAVETOOLEY rebarrel a Cadex 300 win mag for me with a 26in proof, and now I'm thinking I could go with the 300 prc. I could swap in a Cadex magazine sleeve for 49 bucks and be able to use accurate 3.775 or 3.85 mags. Other then the brass issue seems like it might be a good time give it a go, assuming a 26" 10 twist is good enough.
Ammo is available at Midway.. https://www.midwayusa.com/product/6...unition-300-prc-225-grain-eld-match-box-of-20
Bought 6 boxes of the 225s and 4 boxes of the 212's.
Does anyone have a rifle built in 300 PRC yet?
Thanks for the link, I think I got the last box of 225s they had and the 212s were already gone.
I left one box out of the cart. I would have snagged them all, but I felt bad and left one box up for someone else..
I also have a 9.5 on one rifle and a 9 on another. I don't see any reason to faster than a 9.Optimal barrel length and twist for shooting 225’s and 230’s????
I also have a 9.5 on one rifle and a 9 on another. I don't see any reason to faster than a 9.
26" min unless it's a conventional hunting rifle then make it as short as you want.