Re: 300gr VLD Hybrid@ 1700M
Which version QTU you are using? I think latest has it, will check.
Edit: oh you are using Lapua's free version. I got full.
About radar Cd vs G7, I have solved G7 "inaccuracy" by making several cartridge profiles in Android Shooter. I named profiles "250 Lockbase under 1200m" and so forth. I just pick one depending how far tgt is.
About 300gr and MV: (Lapua Mag)
2920fps can be done without excessive pressures with 28" barrel/ Vihtavuori N570.
N570 / 32" LW barrel / 10" twist 3100+ can be also be done but even Lapua brass tends to be trash after first bang. Also 300gr Scenar construction is in its absolute limit at that speed.
BTW about solids and ER shooting, good friend used to shoot 235gr GS customs MV around +3450fps (N570). They were damn accurace and flied flat, but accuracy went badly south somewhere around 1200meters. I guess due to dynamic stability issues. 10" twist.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cali_tz</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I agree Mouse that QTU should be more accurate. And like I said, I need to drill down on this more. So far, and this is very limited data set, for shooting out at 1600 yards, Shooter was very close with about 5 steps of G7 BCs. And Lapua QTU seemed like it was about 1MOA off from where Shooter predicted. But I am having a hard time getting all the atmospheric data sorted out, because unlike Shooter, QTU will not allow rifle zero conditions to be different than current shooting conditions. This really sucks, because it means you have to effectively zero the rifle again during each shooting session. So struggling to get apple to apple comparisons could cause QTU and Shooter not to agree.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mouse07410</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: cali_tz</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
On the Lapua QTU app, there is a complete (almost continuous) drag function covering below, above and transonic speeds, and it doesn't seem noticeably more accurate... Shooter and QTU seem to agree pretty closely. I need to spend more time sifting thru apple to apple comparisons to see. But presumably the Lapua QTU should provide best possible data for Lapua bullets, given they supply these radar measured drag curves.</div></div>
To me hearing that Lapua QTU isn't noticeably more accurate despite using direct drag data obtained from radar measurements is very shocking, to say the least. </div></div> </div></div>