Re: 338 Norma Magnum
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: David S.</div><div class="ubbcode-body">seems like I have not made myself clear enough. The cartrige pictured above is called the <span style="font-weight: bold">7,62 UKM</span>, it is a .30 cal. round based on a shortened .338 Lapua case, and, as far as I know, has <span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">nothing to to with the .338 Norma</span></span> apart from using the same shortend parent case.</div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Fredo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Am i missing something? 3.6 OAL for both doesn't match the photo posted. </div></div>
Seems like I underestimated the power of a picture and overestimated people's inclination to read the accompanying text. I think I should add a more obvious statement that the cartrige pictured is not the .338 Norma.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: David S.</div><div class="ubbcode-body">seems like I have not made myself clear enough. The cartrige pictured above is called the <span style="font-weight: bold">7,62 UKM</span>, it is a .30 cal. round based on a shortened .338 Lapua case, and, as far as I know, has <span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold">nothing to to with the .338 Norma</span></span> apart from using the same shortend parent case.</div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Fredo</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Am i missing something? 3.6 OAL for both doesn't match the photo posted. </div></div>
Seems like I underestimated the power of a picture and overestimated people's inclination to read the accompanying text. I think I should add a more obvious statement that the cartrige pictured is not the .338 Norma.