Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestEveryone else that touched the gun is either charged or accepted a plea agreement. That is just like a libtard; No accountability blame someone else. Here’s hoping that he chokes on his money and the movie flops. Anyone care to guess that he’s contributing to the prosecutor’s reelection campaign?
![]()
Alec Baldwin's criminal charges for fatal 'Rust' shooting to be dropped: lawyers
Criminal charges against Alec Baldwin for the shooting death of "Rust" cinematographer Halyna Hutchins will be dismissed, his lawyers told Fox News Digital.www.foxnews.com
Probably. It's now a battle of good vs. evil and that souless demon just scored a victory for evil, proving the Left is untouchable.This incident will actually make him more popular probably.
Simply more evidence that the justice system is fixed for those with means...Probably. It's now a battle of good vs. evil and that souless, demonic vermin just scored a victory for evil.
Simply more evidence that the justice system is fixed for those who support Commies...
Simply more evidence that the justice system is fixed for those with means...
Maybe the DA had a anonymous donor make a large contribution to her re election campaign?
All guns are unpredictable and dangerous. /sarcUnbelievable . A fucking single action no less
FIFY.
If Elon Musk or Tom Selleck shot someone, they would have been electrocuted before the gun stopped smoking.
Good!Here's the dink. Not a typo.
www.cnn.com › 2023/01/19 › usWhy Santa Fe district attorney decided to charge Alec Baldwin ...
Jan 20, 2023 · CNN — Actor Alec Baldwin will be charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter in the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the Western movie “Rust,” as will...
He paid off the husband by making him the executive producer on the movie plus a buttload of cash.He's lucky it was a lefty he killed they have no values and he probably paid the relatives off cheap. Hell they probably feel sorry for what poor alec had to go through.....
He's lucky it was a lefty he killed they have no values and he probably paid the relatives off cheap. Hell they probably feel sorry for what poor alec had to go through.....
Tell him they’re little boys that don’t mind being raped.How can I get Baldwin to hire my ex-wives to make a movie with him?
"I'm just the person that made some smartass threat toward the deceased, pointed the gun at her and shot her."“I feel that someone is responsible for what happened, and I can’t say who that is, but I know it’s not me,” Baldwin said
I truly hope you don't ever run across a real thug. The kind that will kill you given half a chance for your wallet.
He's not a fool and your hth skill ain't gonna be worth shit when you're bleeding on the ground.
meat curtains?
LoL
The defense lawyer will say that the gun is no longer the same gun Baldwin had in his hand, and cannot be tested by their expert witnesses because it was "broken."Here is some info,
“Special prosecutors dismissed an involuntary manslaughter charge against Baldwin in April, saying they were informed the gun might have been modified before the shooting and malfunctioned. They later pivoted and began weighing whether to refile a charge against Baldwin after receiving a new analysis of the gun.
The analysis from experts in ballistics and forensic testing relied on replacement parts to reassemble the gun fired by Baldwin, after parts of the pistol were broken during testing by the FBI. The report examined the gun and markings it left on a spent cartridge to conclude that the trigger had to have been pulled or depressed.
The analysis led by Lucien Haag of Forensic Science Services in Arizona stated that although Baldwin repeatedly denied pulling the trigger, "given the tests, findings and observations reported here, the trigger had to be pulled or depressed sufficiently to release the fully cocked or retracted hammer of the evidence revolver."
An earlier FBI report on the agency’s analysis of the gun found that, as is common with firearms of that design, it could go off without pulling the trigger if force was applied to an uncocked hammer, such as by dropping the weapon.
The only way the testers could get it to fire was by striking the gun with a mallet while the hammer was down and resting on the cartridge, or by pulling the trigger while it was fully cocked. The gun eventually broke during testing.”
So the fuck sticks at the FBI didn’t get the result they wanted so they beat on the gun until it broke and gave them the results they wanted which resulted in his initial dropped charges due to a faulty firearm.
ADA- “Mr FBI crime lab specialist, what was necessary to cause the firearm in question to fire without the trigger being pulled?”The defense lawyer will say that the gun is no longer the same gun Baldwin had in his hand, and cannot be tested by their expert witnesses because it was "broken."
ADA- “Mr FBI crime lab specialist, what was necessary to cause the firearm in question to fire without the trigger being pulled?”
FBI guy- “We beat on it with a hammer until it broke.”
ADA- “Is the defendant known to have been in possession of a hammer during the incident?”
FBI guy- “Not to my knowledge…”
"I'm just the person that made some smartass threat toward the deceased, pointed the gun at her and shot her."
They finished shooting the scene and were breaking for lunch or something and he made a comment in jest toward the victim to the effect of "I ought to shoot you" as he pointed the gun at her.Did he threaten her?
people may not like it but she brought live ammo on the setWell they just found the armorer guilty of involuntary manslaughter.
this doesn't mean dipshit is free and clearSomeone has to take the fall and it was never going to be the one who aimed a gun at someone and pulled the trigger.
That's how I see it. He may not face a criminal charge but, as a producer, he is responsible for what is happening in a supervisory role. And could face a rather expensive lawsuit.He can (and has) claim I'm just an actor what do I know I trusted the gun "was cold", but he is also the producer and as such he may be found liable.